== I'm not sure what my (tablet) mailer did with my initial posting, but
you might have got it garbled, hence I apologize and send it again. Eric
Hi,
I would tend to agree with what Paul wrote but IANAL and you should ask on
debian-legal for a more authoritative answer. A few more comments
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
I guess, it means that having the icons in a jar file isn't OK, having
them in the file system is OK
Jar files are .zip files. Does this mean that you can't have images in
the same tarball as a GPL'd program in a tarfile?
I
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 02:19:38PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Even considering code in the same jarfile as linked, I don't think
you can link an image to code in the same way.
I've seen it before. Takes an image and makes a C file, something like
char my_img={ 0x11, 0x22, ... etc}
Was evil,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:17:12PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 02:19:38PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Even considering code in the same jarfile as linked, I don't think
you can link an image to code in the same way.
I've seen it before. Takes an image and makes a C
Dear mentors,
(upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have new icons (application icon,
document icon), but the artist wants to keep all rights and only grant
the Freeplane project all rights of use.
-- Is that ok for Debian?
-- Is it even compatible with the GPL-2+ license of Freeplane?
Thanks and
Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net writes:
(upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have new icons (application icon,
document icon), but the artist wants to keep all rights and only grant
the Freeplane project all rights of use.
-- Is that ok for Debian?
No, it's not. See DFSG#1, #7, and possibly #8 too.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu wrote:
-- Is it even compatible with the GPL-2+ license of Freeplane?
It's early in the morning, but my gut feeling is that no, it would not
be compatible.
Why not? It's not uncommon for an upstream to give their code and
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
(upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have new icons (application icon,
document icon), but the artist wants to keep all rights and only grant
the Freeplane project all rights of use.
-- Is that ok for Debian?
Not for Debian main, no.
Hi,
I would tend to agree with what Paul wrote but IANAL and you should ask on
debian-legal for a more authoritative answer.
A few more comments below:
Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
(upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have
9 matches
Mail list logo
