On 04.03.14 08:58:58, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2014 17:56:38 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
The part undo damage I do not understand. From what I understand
dpkg compares the new config with the existing one. So to upgrade from
stable properly I would have to replace my new
On Monday 03 March 2014 17:56:38 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
The part undo damage I do not understand. From what I understand
dpkg compares the new config with the existing one. So to upgrade from
stable properly I would have to replace my new config with the
identical to the existing one,
On 2 March 2014 21:45, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl writes:
The previous maintainer of maradns modified conffiles in postinst
(dynamically checked for the maradns user id and filled
/etc/maradns/mararc with this info). This
On Monday 03 March 2014 08:59:01 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
It is upstream's choice. But I will include such a patch, it is quite
trivial. But this is not the case here.
The problem is that installing the package asks for users' decision
(keep config, replace with maintainer, etc).
Applying
On 3 March 2014 13:51, Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2014 08:59:01 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
It is upstream's choice. But I will include such a patch, it is quite
trivial. But this is not the case here.
The problem is that installing the package asks for users'
On Monday 03 March 2014 16:23:28 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
I agree this is a nice solution with a patch, I will integrate it for sure.
However what should be done in such situation with bug 740332 ?
Should I close it with the new release?
ok, I did not realize that the upgrade test is done
On 3 March 2014 16:41, Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2014 16:23:28 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
I agree this is a nice solution with a patch, I will integrate it for sure.
However what should be done in such situation with bug 740332 ?
Should I close it with the
hi,
I would like to request some advice on a case I need to resolve with
maradns package [1].
The previous maintainer of maradns modified conffiles in postinst
(dynamically checked for the maradns user id and filled
/etc/maradns/mararc with this info). This obviously rendered RC bug of
violation
Dariusz Dwornikowski dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl writes:
The previous maintainer of maradns modified conffiles in postinst
(dynamically checked for the maradns user id and filled
/etc/maradns/mararc with this info). This obviously rendered RC bug of
violation of policy 10.7.3 [2]. I
9 matches
Mail list logo
