Bug#890723: RFS: slick-greeter/1.1.4-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slick-greeter" * Package name: slick-greeter Version : 1.1.4-1 Upstream Author : Clement Lefebvre * URL :

Bug#890461: marked as done (RFS: igmpproxy/0.2.1-1)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:18:39 +0200 with message-id <20180217211839.GA14956@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#890461: RFS: igmpproxy/0.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #890461, regarding RFS: igmpproxy/0.2.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#890712: Subject: RFS: wxmaxima/18.02.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wxmaxima" * Package name: wxmaxima Version : 18.02.0-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License

Bug#890458: marked as done (RFS: udftools/2.0-2)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2018 22:57:32 +0200 with message-id <20180217205732.GA10530@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#890458: RFS: udftools/2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #890458, regarding RFS: udftools/2.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#890681: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexiv2" * Package name: gexiv2 Version : 0.10.8-1 Upstream Author : Jens Georg * URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/gexiv2 * License :

Bug#884816: Bug#890604: Can't reproduce vulnerability on latest packaged FA version

control: tags -1 +moreinfo +unreproducible Hi, As far a I know all the old vulnerabilities reported on debian bugtracker has been fixed in the package made available on mentors.debian.org page. Anyway, to be sure I have tried to reproduce this bug mentioned on new installation version to no

Bug#884816: RFS: frontaccounting/2.4.3-1 [ITA]

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo -unreproducible Could you please followup on the security issue in the actual bug report (#890604)? This is the RFS, and I doubt you meant to mark the sponsorship request as "unreproducible". :) That said, I'm just a messenger: I wanted to make sure you were aware of

Bug#890666: RFS: mmh/0.3-3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mmh" * Package name : mmh Version : 0.3-3 Upstream Author : markus schnalke * Url : http://marmaro.de/prog/mmh/ * Licenses :

Bug#884816: RFS: frontaccounting/2.4.3-1 [ITA]

control: tags -1 +moreinfo +unreproducible Hi, As far a I know all the old vulnerabilities reported on debian bugtracker has been fixed in the package made available on mentors.debian.org page. Anyway, to be sure I have tried to reproduce the bug mentioned on new installation version to no

Bug#890648: RFS: fcitx-imlist/0.5.1-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fcitx-imlist" Package name: fcitx-imlist Version : 0.5.1-2 Upstream Author : Kentaro Hayashi URL : https://github.com/kenhys/fcitx-imlist