On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 01:35:28PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 02:39:05AM -0700, Edwin Kwan wrote:
Hi Guido,
Your package tested out OK. I only have an Indy. So I only tried
tip22.
Thanks for testing! I've uploaded a new version to unstable.
I'm not
, objections, or suggestions to improve this proposal?
Thanks,
Excellent news.This will come very handy.Thanks.
+1
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mips-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
as low risk,
as it is not fixing anything else than the *arch*
dependent socket.h definitions.
please ack
It looks fine to me, fwiw. Unless you see an objection from another
SRM in the next day or so, I say upload.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Can someone running an r4k-ip22 Debian kernel check out #328079 and
see if it still exists? Specifically, I'd like to know if:
1) Still happens in the latest 2.4 in sarge
2) Still happens with the latest 2.6.18 in etch (or sid)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
-cobalt_2.4.27-10.sarge4.040815-2_mipsel.deb, I
do see this line in System.map:
801dd0ac T memchr
Note that the ABI has changed and the mips images don't encode an ABI
number. Have you rebooted since the upgrade?
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
5 matches
Mail list logo