Processed: Re: FTBFS: missing symbols on 32-bit architectures

Processing control commands: > tags -1 ftbfs patch Bug #1067562 [src:mpg123] FTBFS: missing symbols on 32-bit architectures Added tag(s) patch. -- 1067562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067562 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: retitle 1068293 to flowblade: 2.14 missing Depends on python3-libusb1

.14 fails to launch due to missing app.py'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1068293: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068293 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: severity of 1066599 is important

rom 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1066599: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066599 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1065859: marked as done (flowblade: Please drop dependencies on python3-distutils)

misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1065859: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: flowblade Version: 2.12.0.2-1 Severity: important Tags

Processed: tagging 1068224, tagging 1068222, found 1067391 in 1.2.2-2, tagging 1067391, tagging 1068216 ...

068194 1068202: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068202 1068216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068216 1068222: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068222 1068224: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068224 1068230: https://bugs.deb

Processed: Re: lmms: FTBFS on i386: dh_install: warning: Cannot find (any matches for) "usr/lib/*/lmms/libvestige.so" (tried in ., debian/tmp)

eport.cgi?bug=1068155 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1068180: marked as done (FTBFS: C++ versions less than C++14 are not supported.)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1068180: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068180 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: libgav1 Version: 0.18.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https

Bug#1067494: marked as done (obs-studio: FTBFS on time64_t archs)

. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: obs-studio Version: 30.0.2+dfsg-2.1 Severity: serious Hello, looks like

Processed: Bug#1067494 marked as pending in obs-studio

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1067494 [obs-studio] obs-studio: FTBFS on time64_t archs Added tag(s) pending. -- 1067494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1068114: marked as done (libfluidsynth-dev: package depends on libsystemd-dev)

mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1068114: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068114 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libfluidsynth-dev Version: 2.3.4-1

Processed: block 1036884 with 1067272 1067494 1067829 1067561

gi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036884 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1067883: marked as done (terminatorx: Depends on dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123)

misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067883 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: terminatorx Version: 4.2.0-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs

Bug#1062831: marked as done (guitarix: segfaults, when creating a preset bank)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1062831: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062831 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: guitarix Version: 0.44.1+dfsg1-3+b1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc

Processed: Bug#1067883 marked as pending in terminatorx

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1067883 [src:terminatorx] terminatorx: Depends on dead-upstream mpg321 instead of mpg123 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1067883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067883 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Processed: tagging 1067494

gi?bug=1067494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1056141: marked as done (nvenc encoder not available after installing libnvidia-encode1 and enabling ffnvcodec)

no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1056141: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056141 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066683: marked as done (vorbis-tools: FTBFS: codec_skeleton.c:119:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘utf8_decode’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066683: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066683 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066683 marked as pending in vorbis-tools

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066683 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: reassign 1067662 to a2jmidid, tagging 1067662 ..., reassign 1060734 to src:sail

ncies Marked as found in versions sail/0.9.0+repack-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1060734: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060734 1067662: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067662 Debian Bug Tracking Sy

Processed: let these show up on buildd.d.o overview page

debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067646 1067647: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067647 883308: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883308 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: tagging 1067618, tagging 1067624, tagging 1067596, tagging 1067623, tagging 1067609, tagging 1067547 ...

7618 1067623: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067623 1067624: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1067323: marked as done (liblc3: FTBFS: attdet_py.c:20:10: fatal error: numpy/ndarrayobject.h: No such file or directory)

a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067323: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067323 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: liblc3 Version: 1.0.4-2

Processed: Bug#1067323 marked as pending in liblc3

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1067323 [src:liblc3] liblc3: FTBFS: attdet_py.c:20:10: fatal error: numpy/ndarrayobject.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) pending. -- 1067323: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067323 Debian Bug Tracking System Cont

Bug#1059068: marked as done (apt: fails to resolve dependencies)

contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1059068: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059068 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: apt Version: 2.7.7 Severity: normal I'm currently upgrading a stable machine

Bug#1066644: marked as done (pd-hexloader: FTBFS: hexloader.c:608:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066644: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066644 Debian Bug

Bug#1065781: marked as done (libmpeg3: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: audio/synthesizers.c:36:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mpeg3audio_dct64’; did you mean ‘mpeg3audio_dopcm’? [-Werror=implicit-fu

: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1065781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065781 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1066233: marked as done (libmpeg3: FTBFS: audio/synthesizers.c:36:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mpeg3audio_dct64’; did you mean ‘mpeg3audio_dopcm’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declara

administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1065781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#1066566: marked as done (elektroid: FTBFS: editor.c:1166:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘g_unlink’; did you mean ‘unlink’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066566: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066566 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: unarchiving 1061899, severity of 1061899 is important, user release.debian....@packages.debian.org ...

tps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062865 1063105: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063105 1063140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063140 1063888: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063888 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: jackd2: patch to fix ftbfs on m68k; jack{1,2}: unneeded libffado-dev B-D on some arches

cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067447 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1065957: marked as done (sndobj: Please drop dependencies on python3-distutils)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1065957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: sndobj Version: 2.6.7+ds1-3 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs User

Processed: Bug#1065957 marked as pending in sndobj

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1065957 [src:sndobj] sndobj: Please drop dependencies on python3-distutils Added tag(s) pending. -- 1065957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1056989: marked as done (libaacs: build aacs_info)

...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1056989: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056989 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: libaacs Version: 0.11.1-2 Severity: wishlist Hey. Upstream contains the aacs_info program

Bug#1066577: marked as done (nanovg: FTBFS: ../src/nanovg_gl.h:341:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘glBlendFuncSeparate’; did you mean ‘glnvg__blendFuncSeparate’? [-Werror=implicit-functio

. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066577 Debian Bug

Bug#1066676: marked as done (pd-ext13: FTBFS: openpatch.c:61:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘glob_evalfile’; did you mean ‘binbuf_evalfile’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066676: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066676 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#1066607: marked as done (pd-pmpd: FTBFS: mass3D.c:465:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066607: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066607 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1060212: marked as done (pd-pmpd: Update to current version 0.12 and remove recommendation of package puredata-import)

a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1060212: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060212 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: pd-pmpd Version: 0.9-7

Bug#1066493: marked as done (pd-csound: FTBFS: csoundapi_tilde.c:774:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066493: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066493 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Bug#1066493 marked as pending in pd-csound

cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066493 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066192: marked as done (qm-dsp: FTBFS: hmm/hmm.c:703:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dgetrf_’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066192 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source

Bug#1066007: marked as done (qm-dsp: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: hmm/hmm.c:703:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dgetrf_’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066007: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066007 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin

Processed: Bug#1066192 marked as pending in qm-dsp

ian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066007 marked as pending in qm-dsp

bug=1066007 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066591: marked as done (pd-mrpeach: FTBFS: slipenc/slipenc.c:92:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066591: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066591 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Bug#1066591 marked as pending in pd-mrpeach

cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066591 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066642: marked as done (pd-pdogg: FTBFS: oggwrite~.c:156:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘herror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066642: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066642 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066568: marked as done (pd-iemlib: FTBFS: src/FIR~.c:120:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066568: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066568 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066615: marked as done (pd-markex: FTBFS: counter.c:83:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066615: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066615 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066590: marked as done (pd-creb: FTBFS: modules/statwav~.c:116:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066590: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066590 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1066588: marked as done (pd-nusmuk: FTBFS: pbank.c:159:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066588 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1066517: marked as done (pd-hcs: FTBFS: stat.c:123:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066517: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066517 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin

Processed: Bug#1066642 marked as pending in pd-pdogg

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066642 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066588 marked as pending in pd-nusmuk

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066588 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066615 marked as pending in pd-markex

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066615 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066568 marked as pending in pd-iemlib

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066568 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066590 marked as pending in pd-creb

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066590 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066517 marked as pending in pd-hcs

cgi?bug=1066517 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066530: marked as done (pd-tclpd: FTBFS: tcl_class.c:108:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066530: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066530 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066501: marked as done (pd-wiimote: FTBFS: wiimote.c:736:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066501: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066501 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066530 marked as pending in pd-tclpd

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066530 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066501 marked as pending in pd-wiimote

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066501 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066699: marked as done (pd-unauthorized: FTBFS: blinkenlights.c:770:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066699 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Bug#1066699 marked as pending in pd-unauthorized

tps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066699 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066650: marked as done (pd-fftease: FTBFS: fftease_utilities.c:56:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066650 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#1066665: marked as done (pd-ggee: FTBFS: control/unwonk.c:59:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 105: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=105 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066650 marked as pending in pd-fftease

org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066650 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066627: marked as done (pd-cxc: FTBFS: reson~.c:131:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066627: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066627 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066542: marked as done (pd-boids: FTBFS: boids2d.c:472:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066542: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066542 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066665 marked as pending in pd-ggee

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066665 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066627 marked as pending in pd-cxc

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066627 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1066542 marked as pending in pd-boids

bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066542 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#1051418: bad patch: debian/patches/0013-Fix-comparision-if-char-is-unsigned.patch

Processing control commands: > found -1 30.0.2+dfsg-2.1+b1 Bug #1051418 [obs-studio] obs-studio: clicking on an xcomposite window source makes obs segfault Marked as found in versions obs-studio/30.0.2+dfsg-2.1. -- 1051418: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051418 Debian

Bug#1066836: marked as done (libcamera: ftbfs with 64-bit time_t)

contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066836 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libcamera Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: ftbfs User

Processed: Bug#1066836 marked as pending in libcamera

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1066836 [libcamera] libcamera: ftbfs with 64-bit time_t Added tag(s) pending. -- 1066836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066836 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066599: marked as done (libquicktime: FTBFS: qtpng.c:74:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘memcpy’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1066599: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066599 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message

Processed: forcibly merging 1066233 1065781

g here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1065781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065781 1066233: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066233 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1020755 [src:rotter] rotter: reproducible-builds: Embedded build path in /usr/bin/rotter Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1020755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020755 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1039623 [src:shotcut] shotcut: reproducible-builds: build paths trigger differences, embedded date-based version Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1039623: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039623 Debian

Processed: Re: ffmpeg: reproducible builds: Embeds build path in binaries generated with cl2c

naries generated with cl2c Marked Bug as done -- 985187: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985187 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1061501: marked as done (libvorbis: Please disable test-coupling-segfault autopkgtest on armhf)

s mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1061501: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061501 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: libvorbis Version: 1.3.7-1 Se

Processed: Bug#1042996 marked as pending in kodi

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1042996 [kodi] kodi: Kodi autoinstalls 77 unremovable language addons Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1042996 to the same tags previously set -- 1042996: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042996 Debian Bug Track

Processed: closing 1065423

doing anything. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1065423: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065423 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: closing 1065423

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065423 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: severity of 1060467 is important, severity of 1060469 is important, severity of 1060471 is important ...

//bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060610 1060611: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060611 1060614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060614 1060621: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060621 1060623: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060623 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1065318: marked as done (mplayer: Package is not installable due to dependency on libsmbclient)

about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1065318: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065318 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package

Bug#1063107: marked as done (openvdb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063107: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063107 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: openvdb Version: 10.0.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid

Bug#1063139: marked as done (mjpegtools: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063139: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063139 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: mjpegtools Version: 1:2.1.0+debian-8 Severity: serious

Bug#1063127: marked as done (libdvdread: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063127: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063127 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: libdvdread Version: 6.1.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending

Bug#1063114: marked as done (flac: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063114: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063114 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: flac Version: 1.4.3+ds-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid trixie

Bug#1062718: marked as done (qm-dsp: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1062718: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062718 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: qm-dsp Version: 1.7.1-7 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid trixie

Bug#1063296: marked as done (pupnp: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063296: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063296 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: pupnp Version: 1:1.14.18-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid

Bug#1063286: marked as done (portsmf: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063286: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063286 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: portsmf Version: 0.1~svn20101010-6 Severity: serious Tags

Bug#1062935: marked as done (swami: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1062935: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062935 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: swami Version: 2.2.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid trixie

Bug#1062907: marked as done (sndobj: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1062907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062907 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: sndobj Version: 2.6.7+ds1-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid

Bug#1063103: marked as done (opensubdiv: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063103: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063103 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: opensubdiv Version: 3.5.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending

Bug#1063098: marked as done (openni: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063098: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063098 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: openni Version: 1.5.4.0+dfsg-7 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending

Bug#1064184: marked as done (lv2dynparam1: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1064184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: lv2dynparam1 Version: 2-7 Severity: important Tags: patch pending

Bug#1063311: marked as done (zita-alsa-pcmi: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063311 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: zita-alsa-pcmi Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: serious Tags

Bug#1062322: marked as done (lib2geom: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1062322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062322 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: lib2geom Version: 1.2.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending

Bug#1063241: marked as done (wxsvg: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition)

somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1063241: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063241 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: wxsvg Version: 2:1.5.24+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >