.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
missing, however, is any
reference to debconf's config script. Isn't that called by dpkg, too?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
# dpkg --unpack a
# dpkg --purge a
can be done without b present. And you do not need any --force option.
Yes, I see.
We'll have to make an upload of texlive-2007.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV
Frank Küster fr...@debian.org wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.1.0
Severity: minor
The section titled
7.2 Binary Dependencies - Depends, Recommends, Suggests, Enhances, Pre-Depends
also deals with the new Breaks, therefore it should also be in the
title.
Well, of course
no packages.
Versions of packages debian-policy suggests:
ii doc-base 0.8.20 utilities to manage online documen
-- no debconf information
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
a dir list. Actually, this needs to be fixed by
rebuilding the packages against the proper tex-common version, but that
will happen anyway.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The developer's reference describes in
6.7.8 Best practices for orig.tar.gz files
how to document properly any changes that need to be done to the
orig.tar.gz, and recommends the name README.Debian-source
of the
developer's reference, whereas documenting the multiple binary package
thing in that file is probably new. If we give examples, we should
indeed use the most relevant ones.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
with the RC bug policy which
calls out all cron jobs and init scripts.
Yes, of course. Just because some helper script is a quick hack and
contains a
LOGDIR=/var/log/foo
statement in it doesn't mean that it *must* be put into /etc/...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
,
an additional attribute/field could be an implementation suggestion.
This could just point to dh_foo, or to a more complex setup, and give
someone who rarely touches a package in that topic area an easy means
to conform to policy.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
-- no debconf information
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
-- no debconf information
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
policy: (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
-- no debconf information
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
, but also
the release-policy (if not in meaning then at least in wording and
clearness), but we can't expect this to happen right now.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
.
/p
p
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
-- no debconf information
--
Frank Küster
Single
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 06:58:48PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Therefore, I suggest the following patch to the Debian policy:
--- debian-policy-3.7.2.2/policy.sgml.orig 2006-10-05 18:52:02.0
+0200
+++ debian-policy-3.7.2.2/policy.sgml
lost again somehow.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
look at some configuration file,
thus learn the structure of /srv that the local admin chose, and create
files there.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
at least one link
| remaining, without having their configuration overwritten.
`
I think this is a non-bug. It's rather a FAQ on the users' lists.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
and authoritative, is
correct.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 12:19, Frank Küster wrote:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sub-policy documents either can be part of this debian-policy
document or referenced to by this paragraph. They are maintained by their
authors
/doc/debian-policy/policy-process.*
respectively ?
I assume this is an oversight.
Maybe we should file a bug that these files be removed.
Frank Küster writes (Official policy process (was: Bug#375502: debian-policy
must clarify how sub-policies should be managed)):
Is this really true
consistent (and tested). At some point, they can apply to
become part of the policy, with all the side effects like must-clauses
being RC etc. But that's only the end, and the sub-policy document must
exist prior to this, at some other place.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26 June 2006 17:37, Frank Küster wrote:
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.1
Severity: wishlist
The current paragraphs of #1.4, #11.9, #11.9 show perl-policy as
a part debian-policy package
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster writes (Re: Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how
sub-policies should be managed):
For a document called Debian-Foo-Policy to be part of The Debian
Policy it must be included in 1.4. If it is not included there, it is
not mandatory
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster writes (Re: Bug#375502: debian-policy must clarify how
sub-policies should be managed):
I tend to disagree. A sub-policy should only be part of the
debian-policy package, and installed in /usr/share/doc/debian-policy, if
it is accepted
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
how the description of restart could be worded
better to make #224937 a violation of a must-clause? It's annoying when
maintainers insist on a clearly not-intended interpretation of policy.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
, xdrawchem
polyxmass, xdrawchem, gausssum, kalzium
Mathematics [was:Math]
Mathematics-related software.
gcalctool, snapea, xeukleides
xmaxima?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
will use
A in the future. It can safely be removed.
How can that work? If B Depends: A, but A Conflicts: B, won't they just
refuse to be upgraded? I think A needs to declare
Conflicts: B ( = $last_nontransitional_version ).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
maintainer to decide. I am not familiar with
any of those, so that was only a rough guess.
Yes, but it makes the list of packages suitable for Data analysis
smaller; I'm not sure we need it.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
to be similar.
Physics [5]
gdpc- visualiser of molecular dynamic simulations
And this is also very near - MD simulations are based on physics, but
are performed to answer chemical or, I guess more frequently,
macromolecular=biological questions.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank
with that.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
(i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
-- no debconf information
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
a cryptic NCBI and think WTF is that?.
Yes, well, they will. But I don't see any alternative. NCBI is the
name of the institution and the software collection. Nobody has
proposed an alternative, and I think that's because there isn't a good
one.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/
This.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
pgpMUxIiUpoxK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is common practice that /usr/share/doc/package/ is a symlink to
/usr/share/doc/other_package/ if package Depends: other_package.
Therefore I don't see why the copyright file couldn't be a symlink to
/usr/share
a symlink by a directory.
That's not a very strong argument IMO.
Anyway, I see that my idea isn't a good one, and I'll drop that
proposal.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
/usr/share/doc/package/ directory a
symlink.
Should I create a patch for the wording that allows symlinks to other
copyright files from the same source package?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
dpkg-shlibdeps. Since using dh_*
isn't mandatory at all, there's no need to mention it in the policy.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
, or
Web Feed distribution?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
... Being unfamiliar with
Newsfeed and podcast agregators, I also don't get the difference
between the and notification applets.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
-f doctor etc.
;-)
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
)
etc.pp.
:-), Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Linas Zvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Where would timetable managers (KOrganizer...), group task trackers,
etc. be sorted, both one-person-standalone, group-wise-networked, and
connect-me-to-my-palm, or allinone?
Office?
Fine.
I guess dictionaries, thesauri etc
sounds much
like mysql, M$Access and all that stuff I never use and know nothing
about, and I think we would serve our users to give the section a more
end user friendly name. What about data management?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Apps/Science into Apps/Science/{natural,social and
humanities}, we could also add Apps/Science/Tools for bibliography
things and such.
And, maybe related but not strictly connected to Science, how about
Software to visualize processes and structures, like mind mapping?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank
would suggest putting such software in Databases.
Yes, that's a good suggestion.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj) wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:44:28 +0200, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi, is there an established procedure on adding sub-policies (like
the existing menu or mime sub-policies)? Should they live in one of
the involved packages
request to change the Policy?
I am asking because we have drafted a Debian TeX Policy document¹ and
are thinking how to proceed.
Regards, Frank
¹if you've got a TeX-related package and are interested, have a look at
http://people.debian.org/~frank/Debian-TeX-Policy/
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie
X-Posting to -policy, because this might be a bug in Policy. I'm not
subscribed to -policy, please Cc me unless you keep -devel in.
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:32:19AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
what
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do others also think this is an error in policy? Nobody would object if
I raise severity of such a bug and address it in an NMU (which I'm going
to do for a different RC bug, anyway)?
I can answer the second question myself: According to
http
52 matches
Mail list logo
