Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Besides, it's a good thing
anyway as the sungem driver will deal with power management of the chip
even when you are not using it, for example, for sleep mode. It's just a
wrong way of thinking that you should remove drivers for HW you do not
use in fact :)
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
[root@ 19:04:02]# apt-get --simulate install gconf2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... 0%
Building dependency tree... Done
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:13PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
Nope, they are available since a
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:57:00AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:12 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
So anyone knows which app/config at boot time might be responsible for
loading the sungem stuff?
I already completely removed discover to fix this:
Le jeudi 13 octobre 2005 à 13:14 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:13PM
Hi Michel
Hi All
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
[ ... ]
Again: Is it brain dead software or a feature?
Or what did I miss?
Try without --simulate,
Sure. And risk that apt will
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:28:00PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Le jeudi 13 octobre 2005 à 13:14 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:09 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer:
Try without --simulate,
Sure. And risk that apt will remove essential packages? ... :) Apt
being removing stuff is a well-known behavior currently in unstable
Debian, so clearly, Michel, with all due respect: No
airport isn't (yet) auto-detected by hotplug (soon). When that will
happen, your airport driver will also be automagically loaded and there
is no way to know which one will end up eth0 and which one will end up
eth1.
this is a good argument for bsd style network interfaces
/dev/vr0 /dev/fxp0
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 15:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Again: Is it brain dead software or a feature?
Or what did I miss?
Try without --simulate,
On 10/13/05, Dean Hamstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
airport isn't (yet) auto-detected by hotplug (soon). When that will
happen, your airport driver will also be automagically loaded and there
is no way to know which one will end up eth0 and which one will end up
eth1.
this is a good
Looks like the folks over at http://linux-bcom4301.sourceforge.net/ are
making some progress in this area as well.
Check this out. http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:15:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 15:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Again: Is it brain dead software
Hi Ben
Hi All
First this: Removing sungem(_phy) at boot time helps getting airport
up (more in the test report #1 at the end of this mail) And yes, I
believe you, Ben, when you write it's no good to remove these drivers .. :)
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:57:00AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:05:23PM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 21:59 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:50:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:16:10PM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 18:24 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
So far I thought putting a finger to problems might help. Even if I do
that without the soft words of a priest, and in spite of the technical
mistakes I make. But I'm able to learn. Especially if even people like
you don't see
16 matches
Mail list logo