Presence of airport extreme cart [was: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?]

2005-10-13 Thread Yannick Roehlly
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Besides, it's a good thing anyway as the sungem driver will deal with power management of the chip even when you are not using it, for example, for sleep mode. It's just a wrong way of thinking that you should remove drivers for HW you do not use in fact :) Hi,

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

2005-10-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: [root@ 19:04:02]# apt-get --simulate install gconf2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... 0% Building dependency tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

2005-10-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:13PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: Nope, they are available since a

Re: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?

2005-10-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:57:00AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:12 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: So anyone knows which app/config at boot time might be responsible for loading the sungem stuff? I already completely removed discover to fix this:

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

2005-10-13 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le jeudi 13 octobre 2005 à 13:14 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:13PM

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

2005-10-13 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Hi Michel Hi All On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: [ ... ] Again: Is it brain dead software or a feature? Or what did I miss? Try without --simulate, Sure. And risk that apt will

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

2005-10-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:28:00PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: Le jeudi 13 octobre 2005 à 13:14 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

2005-10-13 Thread Keywan Najafi Tonekaboni
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:09 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer: Try without --simulate, Sure. And risk that apt will remove essential packages? ... :) Apt being removing stuff is a well-known behavior currently in unstable Debian, so clearly, Michel, with all due respect: No

Re: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?

2005-10-13 Thread Dean Hamstead
airport isn't (yet) auto-detected by hotplug (soon). When that will happen, your airport driver will also be automagically loaded and there is no way to know which one will end up eth0 and which one will end up eth1. this is a good argument for bsd style network interfaces /dev/vr0 /dev/fxp0

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

2005-10-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 15:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: Again: Is it brain dead software or a feature? Or what did I miss? Try without --simulate,

Re: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?

2005-10-13 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 10/13/05, Dean Hamstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: airport isn't (yet) auto-detected by hotplug (soon). When that will happen, your airport driver will also be automagically loaded and there is no way to know which one will end up eth0 and which one will end up eth1. this is a good

Re: Airport Extreme works on linux!

2005-10-13 Thread Benjamin Racher
Looks like the folks over at http://linux-bcom4301.sourceforge.net/ are making some progress in this area as well. Check this out. http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

2005-10-13 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:15:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 15:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:04:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:13 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: Again: Is it brain dead software

Re: How to get rid of sungem at boot time?

2005-10-13 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Hi Ben Hi All First this: Removing sungem(_phy) at boot time helps getting airport up (more in the test report #1 at the end of this mail) And yes, I believe you, Ben, when you write it's no good to remove these drivers .. :) On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:57:00AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Re: Orinoco/hermes (original Airport) WPA support status

2005-10-13 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:05:23PM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 21:59 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:50:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:16:10PM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: On Wed, 05 Oct 2005

Re: apt (intentionally?) brain dead?

2005-10-13 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 18:24 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: So far I thought putting a finger to problems might help. Even if I do that without the soft words of a priest, and in spite of the technical mistakes I make. But I'm able to learn. Especially if even people like you don't see