Re: Bug#995159: hfsprogs: Directory hardlink problems cannot be repaired.

Hi Adrian, Your answer is still faster than anything from Apple. Just note that your links go to an unofficial repo. The official repository is at . HFS does not look like one of the projects that care about pull requests:

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:50 PM Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Am 20.06.23 um 00:03 schrieb Jeffrey Walton: > > > > You can usually uncover them by building the package with CFLAGS=" ... > > -fsanitize=undefined ... " and CXXFLAGS=" ... -fsanitize=undefined ... > > ". The UBsan sanitizer operates on

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

Hi, Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard: The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success on architectures not tested by upstream. And have Format->Character in Impress crash with Bus error like on mipsel? That doesn't sound too good for basic quality. There

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

Hi, Am 20.06.23 um 00:03 schrieb Jeffrey Walton: You can usually uncover them by building the package with CFLAGS=" ... -fsanitize=undefined ... " and CXXFLAGS=" ... -fsanitize=undefined ... ". The UBsan sanitizer operates on real data. There are no false positives. I'd personally assume

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:29:34PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >... > Am 19.06.23 um 23:19 schrieb Adrian Bunk: >... > > For such a complex package I would expect 32bit breakage in every > > release if upstream no longer tests on 32bit. > Indeed, though at least for 32bit *build* issues they keep

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 5:30 PM Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 19.06.23 um 23:19 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >> ... > >> I won't be of much help here unfortunately, except > >> maybe testing patches, but then again there's

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >... > I won't be of much help here unfortunately, except > maybe testing patches, but then again there's porterboxes >... You are the only one who could realistically debug many of these. E.g. on armel it says: Fatal exception:

Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures

Hi, Am 19.06.23 um 23:19 schrieb Adrian Bunk: On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: ... I won't be of much help here unfortunately, except maybe testing patches, but then again there's porterboxes ... You are the only one who could realistically debug many of these.

Re: Radeon 9600 graphics on an eMac (powermac6,4)

Sorry, I have been meaning to reply about this. I don't believe it's possible to get radeon running without an edid bin (I couldn't get it working anyway, but the situation may have changed since then), and it does need to be loaded from initrd. But I haven't tried a 1152x864 bin file, I use the