On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:18:35AM +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
Ok, if anybody is against I take this responsibility, I can do it, but
before, let me expose some thoughts doubts:
* I understand that GSoC projects are those that are technical and
non-GSoc projects are the
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
I shared Monica's confusion when first reading this thread, I find the
participation in the program was somehow rushed with zack's initial
email leaving some things unclear.
I should indeed apologize for rushing things a bit; that
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
(2) GSoC
admins are OK with asking mentors to direct the 500 USD per project to
the OPW earmark). Otherwise, I'll be happy to pre-approve covering up
what remains on general Debian funds.
The money is given to the mentoring
On 2013-04-02 04:41, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Google pays 5500 USD per project, where 5000 USD goes to the student
and 500
USD to the mentoring organization. Before 2012, the 500 USD given to
the
mentoring organization were used for mostly for the mentors (or the
students
for debconf10) to help
Chris Knadle writes (Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD rights?):
The #1 kind of bug reports that become problems are ones that go like this:
- bug reporter: writes polite and detailed bug report
- maintainer : *cloeses bug* without discussion
(usually within
Ian Jackson writes (Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD rights?):
...
If in this situation there is a possibility of the submitter's
experience being turned into an improvement in the software, it could
arise if the submitter
... can investigate further themselves (perhaps with the
On 02-04-13 19:53, Ian Jackson wrote:
Chris Knadle writes (Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD rights?):
The #1 kind of bug reports that become problems are ones that go like this:
- bug reporter: writes polite and detailed bug report
- maintainer : *cloeses bug* without
On 2013-03-26, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
[ mail followup to: -women, please continue discussion there ]
No. This is a project discussion. Not a women discussion.
TL;DR: we've been invited to participate into GNOME Outreach Program for
Women and I'd like to accept the
I'm on the -project list, so no need to CC me directly. (Fine if you do,
though.)
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 13:53:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
Chris Knadle writes (Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD
rights?):
The #1 kind of bug reports that become problems are ones that go like
this:
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
Seriously, what I'm trying to do is lower the number of cases which
cause frustration and which don't get any traction. Between the
*close* problem, the maintainers that are MIA without the package
being orphaned, maintainers dropping working
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 20:34:28, Russ Allbery wrote:
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
Seriously, what I'm trying to do is lower the number of cases which
cause frustration and which don't get any traction. Between the
*close* problem, the maintainers that are MIA without
11 matches
Mail list logo
