On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:05:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > (Please note: this response is based mostly on the information included in > your message. I only looked cursorily at the actual license of Pale Moon > to confirm that it looks very non-free by our definitions.) >
I /believe/ that the redistribution licence is only applicable to the binaries produced by Pale Moon themselves. However, they do have a restriction on the trademark, which would make things somewhat more complicated. Neil --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
