]] Russ Allbery
> There are two primary reasons why we're continuing to discuss this. One
> is that the decision went a direction that a lot of people didn't, and
> don't, like, and they're still unhappy about it. There's really nothing
> that can be done about this; any other decision would
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement:
Concerns about the Technical Committee"):
> I am discussing how we handle conflict because I hope we can do a better
> job of helping people feel valued even when we do not agree with their
> technical positions.
You've
+1
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
>
> Russ> Martin Steigerwald writes:
> >> Russ Allbery - 28.10.17, 16:13:
>
> >>> There wasn't *anything* "left out" of that
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Martin Steigerwald writes:
>> Russ Allbery - 28.10.17, 16:13:
>>> There wasn't *anything* "left out" of that discussion.
>> In my opinion this is a pretty bold statement.
>> If everyone has
Martin Steigerwald writes:
> Russ Allbery - 28.10.17, 16:13:
>> There wasn't *anything* "left out" of that discussion.
> In my opinion this is a pretty bold statement.
> If everyone has been heard, noticed, felt and valued, if everything has
> been covered, then why are we
Dear Russ, dear Sam, dear people involved with Debian,
Russ Allbery - 28.10.17, 16:13:
> Martin Steigerwald writes:
> > I always found that just focusing on the technical aspects of the Init
> > system discussion left out… everything else. Even the issue in itself
> > was
6 matches
Mail list logo