On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 12:51:19AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hello Roberto.
>
> Roberto C. Sánchez - 29.12.18, 18:12:
> > Suppose for a moment that a project member [… hypothetical case …]
> […]
> > The reason I use the above example is because it is a difficult case
> > to handle. The
Hello Roberto.
Roberto C. Sánchez - 29.12.18, 18:12:
> Suppose for a moment that a project member [… hypothetical case …]
[…]
> The reason I use the above example is because it is a difficult case
> to handle. The cases where harm is clearly intended are
> comparitavely very easy to deal with.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 04:23:02PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have a few posts in recent discussions by people suggesting (or, at
> least, appearing to suggest) that there is a conflict between technical
> excellence and our Code of Conduct (or aiming to increase the diversity
Hi,
There have a few posts in recent discussions by people suggesting (or,
at least, appearing to suggest) that there is a conflict between
technical excellence and our Code of Conduct (or aiming to increase the
diversity of our membership, or similar).
I think there is no such conflict,
also sprach Steve Langasek [2018-12-29 06:21 +0100]:
Regardless of anything else, this is not unconstitutional. The constitution
gives the DPL the power to delegate decisions about approving and expelling
developers;
Correct, but this wasn't about approving or expelling developers.
--
.''`.
5 matches
Mail list logo
