Re: Abusive language on Debian lists

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:12 PM Don Armstrong wrote: > I can't recall a case of listmaster@ actually enforcing the prohibition > of profanity, and I'm unaware of anyone actually using packet radio for > receiving listmail anymore. [If they are, I really hope it's encrypted.] Encryption is

Re: "gr_rms" worked with mutt+gpg+ssh+sendmail (Evolution is difficult)

Hi, On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 23:46 +, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:48 PM Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > Evolution PGP sign seems fragile and it doesn't work > > I signed my vote using Evolution's OpenPGP support and it worked fine for me. > > > (Maybe I should have used S/MIME sign)

Re: "gr_rms" worked with mutt+gpg+ssh+sendmail (Evolution is difficult)

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:48 PM Osamu Aoki wrote: > Evolution PGP sign seems fragile and it doesn't work I signed my vote using Evolution's OpenPGP support and it worked fine for me. > (Maybe I should have used S/MIME sign) Debian doesn't use S/MIME signing in any context. -- bye, pabs

Re: Abusive language on Debian lists

On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Sam Hartman wrote: > I think the blanket prohibition of profanity in the list code of > conduct is outdated and harmful. That's (as it states) a historical holdover: "some people receive the lists via packet radio, where swearing is illegal." I can't recall a case of

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

Le 14/04/2021 à 18:57, Timo Röhling a écrit : > I certainly wouldn't mind if Stephane were willing to help us setup > a nifty e-voting solution and advise us on the best way to proceed. I would be glad to help :-) > Correct me if I am wrong, but as far as I understood it, we cannot avoid > that

Re: "gr_rms" worked with mutt+gpg+ssh+sendmail (Evolution is difficult)

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:48 PM Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi, I finally voted. > > Kurt was right. My initial confusion about UI of Evolution created > mail without signature. (Evolution signature menu is not for PGP sign) > > Also Jessica was right. Evolution PGP sign seems fragile and it >

Re: "gr_rms" worked with mutt+gpg+ssh+sendmail (Evolution is difficult)

Hi, I finally voted. Kurt was right. My initial confusion about UI of Evolution created mail without signature. (Evolution signature menu is not for PGP sign) Also Jessica was right. Evolution PGP sign seems fragile and it doesn't work (Maybe I should have used S/MIME sign) My solution --

Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:59:24AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi again, > > This is not GMAIL problem. This involves only My PC and Debian > servers. > > (I use gmail only for recieving mails. I send mail from my Debian > shell account using SSH when I use @debuian.org address to avoid mail >