Hi,
A number of European mirrors are currently affected by
https://bugs.debian.org/1008108
Cheers,
Julien
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:34:14PM +0100, Paweł Bogusławski wrote:
> Seems its our mirror is not up to date. Sorry for dirturbing.
>
>
> --- Treść przekazanej wiadomości ---
> Temat:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 08 apr 20, 19:40:27, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 14:30:43 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Zhu
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 07:50:22PM +080
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 14:30:43 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi Zhu
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 07:50:22PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > 1. Can you still keep the "-guest" enforcement, so it's still easy to
> > recognize who is DD or not on salsa?
>
> No. The guest suffix was meant to
On 02/08/2018 01:46 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 07/02/18 19:46, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> == Monitoring and metrics
>> We are currently using icinga for monitoring and munin for graphing, but
>> these tools are showing their age. We would like to experiment with
>
for
covering travel and accommodation costs for the sprint.
Attendees: Aurélien Jarno, Héctor Orón Martínez, Julien Cristau,
Martin Zobel-Helas, Peter Palfrader, Tollef Fog Heen
== Team membership
It's been two years since the last update of DSA membership[DSADPL].
Of the delegated members
On 05/10/2017 01:51 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> If this became a requirement, I'd have to terminate my relationship with
> Debian. These are frankly none of anyone's business.
>
Sounds like you missed the "voluntary, opt-in" part?
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
last week-end, members of the release and DSA teams met in Lloret de Mar
to work on separating release.debian.org from ftp-master.debian.org.
Members of ftpmaster weren't able to attend, but helped remotely.
The goals are both to avoid bogging down ftp-master with jobs that can
run
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
June 4th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
The next (and last) point release for "wheezy" (7.11) is scheduled for
Saturday, June 4th. Processing of new uploads into
wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Cheers,
Julien
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 14:03:22 +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 07.12.2012 12:20, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Thanks for securing it quickly :) Is there any danger of the vulnerable
code being in use on other systems, e.g. as part of a dak install?
Indeed, thanks for fixing the issue so
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:15:38 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
However, I do not see much difference between inviting people to shop in a
site
that will share its profit with a Debian team, and inviting our users to
search
the web using an engine that will share its profit with Debian.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 15:47:46 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
I just wonder what this list would be meant to serves which can't be deemed
suitable for -mentors. Many upstreams (regardless they have any preliminary
packages of their software or not) already use -mentors for entering Debian
Hi,
I'm happy to announce that the following applicants have recently
completed the New Maintainer process and are now Debian Developers:
Jan Dittberner j...@dittberner.info (jandd)
Ying-Chun Liu grandp...@gmail.com (paulliu)
Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org (paulproteus)
Andrew Lee
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 00:12:18 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Thoughts?
I'm very much in favour of something like this. Debian is better off
without schilyware imo.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:38:56 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Michael Bienia wrote:
I'm sorry about this but the amount of bugs flowing in into Ubuntu is
bigger that can be handled by the available man power, being it
developer or community members.
How does Ubuntu want to do a proper
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:34:05 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
I think if Debian has worked more than 13 years as it is right now
It has not.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 17:20:28 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 05:10:29PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:34:05 -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
I think if Debian has worked more than 13 years as it is right now
It has not.
How do you call
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:40:30 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Who would you like to propose a release cycle to the project if not
the Release Team?
Nobody proposed anything, you announced a decision to debian-announce.
Without, as far as I can tell, any prior discussion with the developers
(as had
Some new developers were missing from the list:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 16:47:27 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
This is the last mail in a short series providing an overview of people
who became Debian Developer in the past but have not been welcomed to the
project on this list before.
Because
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 18:26:43 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Imagine a process where we only require 5 recommendation emails from
existing DDs. First, it is obvious that different requirements would
apply to those recommendations, than to the current advocate emails:
since the applicant
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:30:53 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
For years, the DAM and NEW queues have been the major source of
frustration in the Debian community.
really? *the* major source of frustration? really?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 16:45:10 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I've been advocating people too early (i.e, I've advocated people so
that they could start NM, while in the meantime, I wouldn't have
advocated them for DM). The reason is that the unassigned applicants
list is huge, so, when
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 21:44:07 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
we got a request to have an upload queue somewhere in the european area,
as uploading to the us might be slow and lead to warning mails from the
queued on ries. So well, here it is:
ftp.eu.upload.debian.org
w00t, ipv6
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 22:46:32 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
What the proposals says is that any two out of the (currently)
thousand can block all entrants. This is scary to me.
And if they do that, the rest of us can get them to stop (be it by peer
pressure or removal from the project
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 00:06:19 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Lenny is not yet the stable release of Debian. Everything you are
looking for will be available when Lenny will replace Etch.
It'll be too late for upgrade testing then… People doing that need
preliminary release notes now.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 19:34:20 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:38:51PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
I discovered that [EMAIL PROTECTED] rejects any
mails from non-subscribers
Rejects or holds back?
Rejects. Holding back for moderation would be just fine, as long
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 18:33:01 -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The change is needed, since the BTS needs to know if the bugs are closed
in that version or not.
Could you propose an alternative wording for the following paragraph?
para
When a package has been NMUed, the maintainer should
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 20:47:50 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Now, the idea would be to deprecate this feature, used by 8 packages in
unstable, dropping complications in the database backend and the pool
layout which we would want to avoid.
Maybe you could tell us what the benefit of dropping
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 20:36:17 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
Stop trolling about utterly uninteresting details?
HTH,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 23:50:10 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Clint Adams wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 05:53:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
suites. Well we don't really want to special case i386, but currently it
Then why do you?
Because it's not up to us to decide how buildd maintainers
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 16:27:25 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
The bug is currently in the archive.
ITYM the non-bug.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 14:42:46 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I personally think that *none* of them[1] meet the DFSG.
Yes, you've said that multiple times now.
Unfortunately, FTP-masters seem to disagree with me...
Anyone who would like to read further details on my view on the topic
could
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 00:42:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:18:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Because bugs may also have been (or seem to have been overlooked). The
risk here is that the person doing the NMU thinks oh, that's an old
issue and the fix seems
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 18:13:12 +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
At least w3bfukk0r was not allowed
to get into the archive because of its offensive name and
hot-babe also never made its way into the archive.
You mean they were actually
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 22:23:58 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
php is a popular candidate to have from backports on a lot of big
german hosters, for example. If they could help somehow they would, as
debian is dominating the market completly and this is a very common
problem.
do we have
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 17:04:13 +, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
I would ask you on behalf of debian to not run for office for
^^^
those reasons.
wtf?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
://www.debian.org/logos/ pour les termes exacts, et le logo
lui-même.
Cordialement,
Julien Cristau
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
37 matches
Mail list logo
