On 2010-05-05, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
This is still an annoying thing to handle. If you install machines at
different
locations regulary, this firmware crap is nothing but a pita. I can't see a
reason why we should not be able to ship cd-images in non-free.
I fully concur.
On 2009-07-30, Teemu Likonen tliko...@iki.fi wrote:
On 2009-07-30 13:12 (+0200), Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-07-30 11:36 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Oh, and Debian got hundreds of active developers, and I doubt they'll
be running to Shuttleworth anytime soon.
Probably not, but the
On 2009-07-30, Marc Haber mh+debian-proj...@zugschlus.de wrote:
I don't see the advantage for Debian short of probable ease of work
for the security team (which doesn't seem to have commented yet).
The synergy is negligable, since the most time-consuming elements (testing,
handling the buildds
[Followup-To: header set to gmane.linux.debian.devel.new-maintainer.]
On 2009-03-14, Thomas Viehmann t...@beamnet.de wrote:
Hi,
if you allow me to share a thought here even though I am not a developer
and as such do not have any say in this.
Matthew Johnson wrote:
My goals with changing the
On 2009-02-09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040603030801070601030404
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
[ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure
Frederique W. Piccart wrote:
I've just read about blobs and that Debian is not completely free, even
if with the fact I refused non-free and contrib software during expert
install.
What gives? Is Debian ever going to be completely free from blobs for
users who prefer this?
Go ahead, the
On 2007-11-30, Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote:
I believe buildd redundancy does not mean having 2+ active buildds,
but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a
Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:50:29PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
* Infrastructure teams have to decide to accept or reject candidates who
nominated themselves. The basic requirements are:
Why should teams decide on their own membership? I don't think this
should be allowed.
Alexander Wirt wrote:
Huh? Distributing computer games without the necessary permission
under applicable youth protection laws is already forbidden.
[..]
planetpenguin-racer is affected as well. It doesn't matter whether
the game is violent or not. There's only an exception for mostly
Malte Hahlbeck wrote:
Today the upper House of the German Parliament (Bundesrat)
decided to declare Security Software like nmap, nessus etc.
illegal in a way that the software itself and not it's
criminal use is indictable. That is no Joke. This Law will
be active when it is published. That
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
- tofee: up, building packages, sometimes stable-security.
I think it is time to changes things. Our faster build daemons have a
233MHz CPU with 256MB of RAM, while there are way faster ARM CPU today.
How much faster is the fastest available ARM CPU compared to toffee?
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
- tofee: up, building packages, sometimes stable-security.
I think it is time to changes things. Our faster build daemons have a
233MHz CPU with 256MB of RAM, while there are way faster ARM CPU today.
How much faster is the fastest available ARM CPU
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
* Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070410 08:19]:
(There are many news items more or less just quoting the release=20
announcement,
But also note, that lazy journalists might falsify your positive
statistics ;)
(Please take this as enhancement bug, not a flame)
David Nusinow wrote:
The rough plan is to provide an alternative set of updated kernel packages
and potentially also xservers (depending on how modular the new X.org
modulization really is) nine months after Etch release. ian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
martin f krafft wrote:
and that they add support and maintenance, which adds the features
- reliable release cycle
- newest packages
- security team
- security administration
Their latest security update is from February...
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Martin Schulze wrote:
It would be good, though, especially in order to have some support for
hardware that has entered the market after the last Debian release, if
there would be an outside repository for updated kernel and installer
packages. However, nobody considered this important enough
Martin Schulze wrote:
Couldn't we just put something nice there? Like news that actually show
how alive Debian is, reporting about new, shiny software packages in
testing, with xxxtra-bling! Seriously, good press work isn't when you
send out a hrm, still not dead notice every three of four
Anthony Towns wrote:
Since the above, Moritz Muehlenhoff has been added as a security
secretary and given priveleges to do security updates for testing via the
security.debian.org infrastructure, but there's been no other activity
to my knowledge.
I'm busy with the sarge2 kernel update, I'll
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.project, you wrote:
Several of you work closely with GNU people. A question
for you. Is the FSF a body like the IETF, W3C or Debian
in which stakeholders make reasonably collaborative
policy decisions together? Or is FSF policy more or
less another name for the
19 matches
Mail list logo
