On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 08:45 Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> Yes, I agree with you. Thought my proposal was to change that fact (ie:
> change the constitution) so we can give more power to Kurt.
>
Ah, got it. Yes, I also agree with you that this would be a good thing. :)
>
Hi zigo,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:16 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> I'd be very much for leaving the decision of open/close to our
> secretary, with most votes open, and the possibility for him to decide
> when it should be closed. I trust Kurt to do the right thing whenever a
> vote (like the
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 5:08 PM Timo Röhling wrote:
>
> 1. Do we want to retain the ability to vote openly?
>
Yes, options are always good. However, as I mentioned on Salsa[1], I think
secret is the better default going forward. Confidentiality allows people
to vote what they think instead of
Hi Jacob,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:29 PM Jacob Lifshay
wrote:
> I didn't see any recent announcements and couldn't find any salsa-specific
> mailing lists, so I'm posting here. Which location would I find status
> announcements for salsa?
>
It's down for a security issue. [1]
-Olek
[1]
On 8/12/20 8:19 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I'd like to take a moment to express regret and what I've learned that I
> can improve with the interaction I had with Olek . I deeply regret that
> Olek walked away from that interaction feeling like I was dismissing his
> ideas including the idea of
Sam,
I do not appreciate your aspersions and I think your hostile attitude is
completely uncalled for. I don't know why me sharing my thoughts on this
subject has triggered you into lashing out.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020, 19:04 Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> Sometimes that is necessary; some ideas need to
nd the original query.
>>>>> "Olek" == Olek Wojnar writes:
>
> Olek> Thanks to some great tools, it's fairly easy to
> Olek> verify that they do indeed control the email addresses tied to
> Olek> their key. That's what I care about at that poin
Hi Sam,
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:39 PM Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> TL;DR: I think without some link back to real world identity, we open
> ourselves up to attacks where people build trust only to betray us.
>
I agree with you that this is a potentially-serious problem. However, I'm
not sure that
Hi Mo,
I love this idea, thanks for putting it together! I have not read the
details (yet) but I strongly support your overall purpose. Specifically, I
think that automating repetitive and structured parts of the review process
for both sponsors and the ftp team is a great idea and will benefit
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:19 PM Ross Vandegrift
wrote:
> Sorry for not speaking up, but I agreed with your concern. I thought
> the summary overemphasized cons and dismissed the pros.
>
> I'm sending this in case this is a situation where only negative
> feedback is voiced. I think Neil's
If we were having this discussion on Discourse I would give this idea a +1.
:)
Well... technically a <3 but...
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:02 PM Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> For a little while, I've been keen to see how we can improve our
> communication methods, both to make it more
11 matches
Mail list logo
