is not really any
better.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
obvious he'll success.
IOW we could only lend money to people who will already be able to find
money by themselves easily enough. It's not Debian job at all, not to
mention the legal complexity to do that worldwide.
Sorry, but this idea is nonsensical.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
be totally illegal in France too.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
was that Debian is allowed
to redistribute the stuff, which kind of makes sense ;)
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
signature.asc
Description
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:51:08PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Pierre Habouzit]
It yields a really costly entry point to target Linux as a
platform, and it's exactly why most Software Vendors target RHEL
and not Linux. And that's part of the reason[1] why most of our
customers
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:52:10AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org [2009.08.05.2333 +0200]:
But speaking from my experience as an employee of a software editor, I
can tell that the distribution diversity is a huge problem when it comes
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:02:59PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org [2009.08.06.1104 +0200]:
You're comparing apples and oranges here, for HTML is a standard,
and theoretically, following the standard is enough (and even that
is probably
://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
pretty sure you will find rotting bugs in the Debian BTS
on your packages too ;)
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
signature.asc
Description
Torvalds' statement.
[...]
which basically amounts to: If you speak about freedom, you're an extremist
full of hate.
Nice.
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
many example of bad (or rather
inexistant) cooperation, or even dirty tricks like #539950, which
undermines the former tries a lot.
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue
be a forward to running
apt-get inside that chroot;
- find a way to let the user run commands from that chroot seamlessly.
That would be totally acceptable, and probably an improvement over the
current situation.
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
to processing, so in the end, yes, it rather adds
bureaucracy to the whole thing.
OTOH, I'm not sure merging DAM and FD is something that will change the
frace from NM, but for sure, it's a step in the good direction.
--
Intersec http://www.intersec.com
Pierre Habouzit pierre.habou...@intersec.com
Tél
.
We're having a serious discussion, and you guys are adding noise.
Priceless.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpqd6oJvCkzw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
seem much closer to
resolution.
If you can't understand the Please postpone the bikeshedding after the
lenny release so that you'll have proper answers-bit then I can nothing
for you.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··Omadco...@debian.org
OOO
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp979g65egmX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to
not do anything foolish, beyond what they understand.
What we should test is that and only that (okay good understanding of
the project, and of the people, and so on is vital too, but I suppose
we're only discussing skil-wise).
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
(and a hash so that people cannot do
that with a cron job, that would defeat the feature).
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpgELAgx7H5s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
than one's should be able to do on his own. Only if the
old key is invalid for some reason (key was revoked, expired, whatever)
then yeah, we should not let that people do it either.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
I don't really have the time
to write about them just now.
Mind to start a DEP with this proposal as a basis ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpAjEUAzWHFc.pgp
the nature of Debian, and the spirit of the constitution.
I'm blatantly disappointed in both the form and the ground of this
edict.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 08:48:51AM +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 10:37 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
So when the
*constitution* gives him the right to do what he just did (yeah, sadly
he can and we have to be 2:1 to overrule that yeah), it's completely
completely ignored ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgptpXGfmouzr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
efforts, I've seen *none* of
them do NMUs because they felt like it.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpjZnmTyWXqo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:28:44PM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:10:29PM +, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
This was initially written by me, then discussed within DAM (so take
us two for we) and then discussed with DSA
at
the unblock requests, some are totally WTF. Just a random example.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpEOZcMEbN1V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgptqtjWZXeTy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Now, regarding your proposal itself, I agree with others that it
sounds too bureaucratic, even for Debian.
Is it?
I agree, I fail to see what's bureaucratic about the proposal. After
all it's a simple 2x2 matrix with requirements for the 4 boxes.
unbelievable
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
,
le site www.debian.fr n'est pas géré par Debian.
To be complete, www.debian.fr is cybersquatted, and the content shown
is a very old mirror from www.fr.debian.org, far from complete, and
served by an IIS.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL
· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpitq7Hnp2Ht.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 06:49:37AM +, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:19:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
or we could disallow the override of = E: errors in lintian, and make
lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:08:33AM +, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know, but maybe (but that's sad if we need to do that) we should
have overrides validated by the QA people … *sigh
.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpqXAAdogwp1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
overrides when they review a package.
or we could disallow the override of = E: errors in lintian, and make
lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and
install windows over your Debian if you override such errors.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:54:39PM +, Michael Banck wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
or we could disallow the override of = E: errors in lintian, and make
lintian reboot your computer, fill your gpg with /dev/random bits, and
install windows over
, whereas you could have argued that the former was a
spam, now you will have a hard time thanks to this one, that I'm sure
will rank as the second hit for your name. way to do :D
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
as a sponsor to be
sure the guy you sponsor is ready and gets things right.
Cheers,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpYeKGh7qhaK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:10:42AM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:10:41PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I note that the 4th package made an interesting choice indeed.
The Dm-Upload-Allowed: field is only relevant for DM when there're non-DD
uploaders listed.
It's
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:50:57AM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:10:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:10:41PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Here is the current list.
When psql on merkel gets updated to a version that can load the dumps
could also specify which
packages the DMs are allowed to upload.
OTOH this is a moving target, as the DM-keyring maintainers are not
the ones dealing with that, but the sponsors.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
: Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter De Wachter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpLPKROHH8Ak.pgp
Description: PGP signature
was discussed ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpVJBppsHnGx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:19:07AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
If MjR has issues with the company Debian-UK (or any other alike
organization) he buys his t-shirts from, then he should mention it to
this organization's board, and the ethics
tend to dislike proselytism and
sanctimonious attitudes.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpadPtYThmcn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#s-kernel-changes
Here is your answer.
As a general rule, release notes are worth reading.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp
, no so long time ago, it
was about Windows, at least Solaris is an Unix.
*cough*
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp7LcCyFyzkY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
would be an appropriate way?
By spending the day arguing about whether users or free software are the
more important priority? ;)
revisionist !
SCNR
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
definitely a _bad_ idea.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpxBsWl2uKOq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:48:04AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
multi-byte one would be really really bad (as you would end up with e.g.
strings split in the middle of a point code, *brrr* you definitely don't
want that).
I wasn't clear it seems, but what I mean is if a programs assumes
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:46:40PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On ma, 2007-06-18 at 13:37 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:48:04AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
multi-byte one would be really really bad (as you would end up with e..g.
strings split in the middle
Lizensierung. Tatsächlich,
diese Software sind Frei, Sie können an [1] Erklärungen finden, um zu
lernen, waß es im einzelnen bedeutet.
http://www.debian.org/social_contract.de.html#guidelines
Hochachtungsvoll,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL
was completely under the impression that *he*
was the one trolling our lists for months.
Makes me think, he can't be alone to generate all that flood, or he
uses scripting. Maybe the latter given the very high redundancy of the
content, wording and annoyance.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
in Debian, and you mentionned Gtk, which
is fine in Python.
Pierre Habouzit wrote bts-link which is Python based and interfaces
with our BTS and Bugzilla, and he mentionned the idea of a bug
forwarding tool as well; perhaps he has some code to share (especially
the BZ part I expect
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:58:40AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:47:22PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Well at first it is. One of my main sponsoree is Fathi[0]. I sponsor
him for quite a long time now, I'd say a year at least. The beginning of
our relationship
Attached is my ${keyid}.changes for fathi boudra, proposed for
inclusion in the DM jetring.
It is debsigned with my own gpg.key, just tell me if it needs any kind
of tweaks in the fields syntax.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED
could be of use, yes.
[0] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] https://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=fboudra%40free.fr
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
is not finished.
TTBOMK Christian already chosed suite IIRC, which is a good term, the
discussion is from May 2006 for god's sake !
IOW: We just don't need to bring this up _again_.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
-nomination. What do others think?
Sounds better to me.
Ditto.
ditto
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpveMU3rApwR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:41:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I'm not sure what you're asking to be communicated.
The following of the mail looks perfect to me, I would really have
liked to have a place where I could
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 05:14:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:44:55AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Do you want a Simple example ? For almost 4 or 5 months (if not more)
there is no Alpha machine available to developers, one being restricted,
the other in lock
have the same set of skills, maybe work 10% slower, but
communicate and reduce the project frustration to 0 wrt core teams.
So sorry, but I don't buy a single word of your argumentation here.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 08:45:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:44:55AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
So sorry, but I don't buy a single word of your argumentation here.
It wasn't an argument; it was just a statement of things are, as I see
them. In so far as how
about a DPL Team in general, but this instance is
clearly not a thing I'd like to see, for at least the two previous
reasons.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
succession, or even not nominate himself in the first place. MIA
developers are enough of a shame to not even dare to suppose a DPL can
go MIA.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:08:51PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
10 people is the best way to ensure nothing ever gets done. That sole
number shows that you don't really understand how hard it is to have a
leadership with more than one person
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:04:34PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
it's not as bad as inexistant RM's or ghost DSA or absent Buildd Admins.
After a second read that sentence does not looks that good. I don't
mean that our RM's are inexistant, that would not be fair to them.
Please really read
of hell. I
don't know who are the sparc buildd admins, but for sure, the arm port
do not seem to be that well.
[1] http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week-big.png
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
a lot, and did not want to see etch being released with a
diminished quality or in a hurry.
[0] Or maybe your browser totally lack image support. I can point to
you many very lightweight browsers that can do that, you can mail
me privately if you need some pointers.
--
·O· Pierre
: or
whatever else too.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp9ZlhOCb8K6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpO2nNaWo7W5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpEyzJu0iw7I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
?) ?
that question was just a mild provocation, aka a rhetorical effect.
please don't offend me in trying to answer to that.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
Le dim 8 octobre 2006 15:36, Stephen Gran a écrit :
This one time, at band camp, Pierre Habouzit said:
Le dim 8 octobre 2006 14:18, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
And if the comments associated to the project proposal indicate
that there's some controversy in the idea behind the project
Le mer 4 octobre 2006 13:25, Daniel Ruoso a écrit :
Isn't it the time to recreate the non-us section?
no, at least not for patent issues. we would need a debian-${COUNTRY}
rather than a non-US if we begin to take that into consideration.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
Le mer 4 octobre 2006 19:47, Daniel Ruoso a écrit :
Qua, 2006-10-04 às 14:04 +0200, Pierre Habouzit escreveu:
Le mer 4 octobre 2006 13:25, Daniel Ruoso a écrit :
Isn't it the time to recreate the non-us section?
no, at least not for patent issues. we would need a
debian-${COUNTRY
, and affirm that
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] was mine.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpAHSvU0eKFo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to meet the 3:1
requirement instead of attempting to define ourselves into such a
position, especially when source code is clearly a desirable thing
to have from our users and our perspective.
and I also feel that's needed.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp4FQdINokut.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(oh
yeah).
not to mention that apache2.2 (fixing many problems I'm told) has been
released in january (so it's not really cutting edge anymore, and I've
not seen the experimental packages either).
apache[12] maintenance in debian is quite a shame in its current state
IMHO.
--
·O· Pierre
that
nobody/noone/nothing can prevent an actual enhancement of the distro to
go on. But one should /still/ be responsible for that or that package,
this is what makes debian special, and I will defend it.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED
been *that* easy.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpZbEQFpDtvP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Le ven 28 juillet 2006 23:01, Gustavo Franco a écrit :
On 7/28/06, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you know a thing that could benefit from that ?
- unofficial ports (kfreebsd e.g.) for whom it's a real PITA to
have their patches (often of *excellent* quality) to get
has dedicated his life fighting against it.
debian does not contains non-free software. non-free is not part of
debian, it's only supported using the same tools.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:06:26PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
debian does not contains non-free software. non-free is not part of
debian, it's only supported using the same tools.
The differences between main, contrib, and non-free are only
in charge
for python in debian is also a cannonical employee.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgph1Yrhn6C8Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to be
compatible). What I'd prefer is that big transition would be as much as
possible prepared collectively. Else, we are bound to have useless
crufty diffs, that I even won't bother to read, because it's only lost
time.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL
· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpr6KEoY6Svp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Le Lun 8 Mai 2006 23:21, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
* stable is not a branch.
Pierre Habouzit answered to this, and I agree with him. However,
he raised at the same time new concerns about considering testing and
unstable branches, and said that referring to experimental as a
branch
. and is IMHO completely
absurd for experimental.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpAcGCpbYVPZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Le Mer 12 Avril 2006 14:36, Vincent Danjean a écrit :
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
So to my eyes, the so called problem you raise is irrelevant. Not
to mention that I would feel concerned and surprised (in a bad
sense) if an applicant would have such issues. e.g.: if you have an
issue with your
to become a DD, then, *don't ask for
beeing one*, because that's a public matter. Debian is about
transparency.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpRdiVML0lwU.pgp
did that, and I found that rather
useful). In a glance you can see applicants that are not comited
enough.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpYF1RjV14kd.pgp
, and the current process let it open to any trigger
happy developer who happens to dislike another one or whatever.
seconded.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpD19Kmm7pv9.pgp
:/
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpfqDZHKMtk8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is
just too big, and seeing the users forwarding bugs when they can would
be quite a relief.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org
[2] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
please don't start the hot-babe thread again ...
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpAcvJxLFDHm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
