Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Is it actually OK for FD to demand that candidates go through DM
before applying for DD, or as part of the NM process?
If the FD isn't fairly confident that someone has enough experience in
Debian to make occupying an AM's
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
...snip...
Instead of saying there's a bug that was badly handled, so we should
never collaborate better on anything, let's look for opportunities to
make things better. We have a good opportunity to make a profound
change in the way upstreams and distributions
Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
...snip...
This is hilarious. Two posts attacking the man -- ad
hominem --
and these are the folks talking about being less aggressive.
Twisting again are you?
Only
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Richard Hecker wrote:
While consensus might exist that eliminating bureaucracy is
good, division of labor can be a good thing too. I do not think you
have established the need to combine the FD and DAM tasks. Are
you claiming the DAMs are too bureaucratic
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Don't you think that there's some sense in listening to what Emilio
says, whithout immediately minimizing his arguments, since he has
already been at least 4 times more useful to Debian than you were during
the last 8 years?
- Lucas
I did listen. That is why it was
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Kęstutis Biliūnas wrote:
Say the truth to each loser would be more honestly, I think.
One such unfortunate,
So you think you are a loser? I don't think so. What I know from your AM is that
your progress towards becoming DD and knowing all the things a DD needs to
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Please, everybody, let's try to discuss patches to the DEP, rather than
general stuff about communication. (unless you want to reject the whole
DEP, but only Richard Hecker seems to want that)
In spite of my intention to not comment any further, I just cannot
let
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 30/05/08 at 01:44 -0700, Richard Hecker wrote:
...snip...
You failed to find consensus in the thread I referenced in the
previous message.
... which led me to thinking of what we could do to improve the current
situation while staying consensual.
Because I
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/05/08 at 09:55 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
...snip...
I miss one thing in these guidelines: they sort of give you the idea you
can NMU someone's packages off as long as you go by the book, and that
you have the RIGHT to do it no matter what.
Eeric Evans wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
[...]
On several IRC channels it is a requirement to reveal the realname.
[...]
If one does not like such rules, they are free to not join such
meetings.
...snip...
But lets have a look at http://pastebin.ca/885288 again and see
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
...snip...
I have seen no discussion on how the soc ctte is going to go
about ensuring that such cultural differences are noticed, or taken
into account in the resolution process; or that any thought has been
taken to address cultural diversity in the dispute
Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
It is not enough, i want the suspension revoked, since it was a stupid
decision, which has achieved
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 22:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
...snip...
When will Debian realise that there should be a way to solve social problems,
and actually try to solve it, instead of trying to censor or silence the most
annoying party ? This is a real question, and once Debian has an answer
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 07:07 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
...snip...
I would have gladly accepted any decision, provided it was a fair one, but
this one-sidedness is what caused all of this.
One big problem here is the way you define fair in this context.
There are many other DDs unwilling to
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:27 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2007-03-29, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you deny that rejection is an act of hate ?
I do.
Obviously, I do too!
Rejection is many things that in many cases is not hate. It might be
dislikement, it might be lack of
15 matches
Mail list logo
