Am Sat, 21 Nov 2015 20:34:49 +0100
schrieb Tollef Fog Heen :
> It's interesting to see that FSF fails this test themselves. They're
> using a third party DNS service for one of their DNS servers (FSF
> France, which is a sister organisation of the FSF, hence a third
> party.)
You
I don't feel the need to talk about open soure on depian-project at
the moment. But if you do, don't forget the origins. A good summary is
at http://oreilly.com/openbook/opensources/book/raymond2.html. It is
really worth reading from first hand what the intentions of the
Open-Source-campaign are.
It looks like this discussion gets somehow heated as could be expected.
My opinion is that it is impossible to decide which DE Debian should
suggest to its users. Because it highly depends on personal preferences;
what features are expected and, just as well, what much hated features
must not be
Yes, I did not notice all of it free. in the original. But I did not
because it is in the midst of a chapter, not at the end, and it is not
emphasized. This small changes change the meaning.
pixelgirl explained she only took the first part of the text.
The full text would have ruined the
At Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:22:29 +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
Because the current website is *all but impossible to navigate*,
lacking many of the signposts that users rely on to find their way.
On the current Debian website, we have the following sidebar:
Getting Debian
CD vendors
CD
will not talk about all that young women surrounding me I'm missing.)
Debian is not young and sexy. Debian is an operating system (and more).
It is rock solid. It is developed by a community dedicated to free
software. Please stay Debian (including your image).
Werner Baumann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
if Ubuntu says it agrees on model 2.
Werner Baumann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
7 matches
Mail list logo