Absolutely, the DPL, or DAM, or others may forward to the CT.
That would count as it being directed their way.
TL;DR: As Tina points out, this delegation does not accomplish
everything. It is an incremental step forward, one of many we've taken
this last year. Tina brings up a number of points where there might be
value in revising text if we get the support to do so. I welcome such
proposals for
Le 13/04/2020 à 17:19, Sam Hartman a écrit :
AS I understand it the only open issue preventing a delegation is the
following; we need to find wording that makes it clear you can write to
parties other than the CT.
>> * To respond to concerns raised by members of the project or
>>
Hi Sledge,
On 14/04/2020 16:03, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I hope you're keeping well in these difficult times... *hugs*
I am doing fine, thanks. I wish the same for you and your family!
>> It seems to me that this delegation text does not improve the
>> situation of the Community Team compared
Hey Tina!
I hope you're keeping well in these difficult times... *hugs*
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 07:14:01AM +0100, Martina Ferrari wrote:
>On 09/04/2020 22:40, Sam Hartman wrote:> I'm pleased to finally be
>able to propose a Community Team delegation
>> for discussion. During the last year it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/04/2020 22:40, Sam Hartman wrote:> I'm pleased to finally be
able to propose a Community Team delegation
> for discussion. During the last year it has become clear that we
> can accomplish more at lower emotional cost when we have the
>
Hi Sam,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:19:40AM -0400, Debian Project Leader wrote:
>
>AS I understand it the only open issue preventing a delegation is the
>following; we need to find wording that makes it clear you can write to
>parties other than the CT.
>
>> >> * To respond to concerns raised
AS I understand it the only open issue preventing a delegation is the
following; we need to find wording that makes it clear you can write to
parties other than the CT.
> >> * To respond to concerns raised by members of the project or
> >> people interacting with them, working with
On Friday, April 10, 2020 9:14:43 AM EDT Sam Hartman wrote:
> TL;DR: The concern Scott raises is a good one, and I think he caught me
> out on a wording problem in the delegation text.
>
> > "Scott" == Scott Kitterman writes:
> Scott> Constitution 5.1.4 give the DPL the power to "Make
TL;DR: The concern Scott raises is a good one, and I think he caught me
out on a wording problem in the delegation text.
> "Scott" == Scott Kitterman writes:
Scott> Constitution 5.1.4 give the DPL the power to "Make any
Scott> decision for whom noone else has responsibility." Some
Sigh.
I propose delegating the following developers as members of the
Community Team.:
> - Pierre-Elliott Bécue (peb)
> - Luke Faraone (lfaraone)
> - Steve McIntyre (93sam)
> - Jean-Philippe Mengual (jpmengual)
Sigh.
Steve pointed out that I left off a name in review comments and I missed
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 5:40:18 PM EDT Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'm pleased to finally be able to propose a Community Team delegation
> for discussion. During the last year it has become clear that we can
> accomplish more at lower emotional cost when we have the Community Team,
> Account Managers
I'm pleased to finally be able to propose a Community Team delegation
for discussion. During the last year it has become clear that we can
accomplish more at lower emotional cost when we have the Community Team,
Account Managers and DPL working together, supporting each other. It's
become
13 matches
Mail list logo
