Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-02-23 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:05:34PM +0100, Torsten Werner a écrit : Am 27.01.13 02:04, schrieb Charles Plessy: Torsten, do you konw what is the FTP team's position on this ? Such version upgrades has been accepted some years ago but I forgot the packages names. Thanks for the information; I

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-28 Thread Torsten Werner
Am 26.01.13 15:01, schrieb Jakub Wilk: AFAICS there are no analogous clauses in CC-BY-2.x, though. That is because CC-BY is less restricted than CC-BY-SA. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-28 Thread Torsten Werner
Am 27.01.13 02:04, schrieb Charles Plessy: Torsten, do you konw what is the FTP team's position on this ? Such version upgrades has been accepted some years ago but I forgot the packages names. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:30:32PM +0100, Torsten Werner a écrit : there have been discussions on debian-legal about the CC versions and their issues. AFAIK you can always upgrade the version of the CC license. Upgrading the license through debian/copyright should work if you cannot convince

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org, 2013-01-26, 22:35: there have been discussions on debian-legal about the CC versions and their issues. AFAIK you can always upgrade the version of the CC license. Upgrading the license through debian/copyright should work if you cannot convince the upstream

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 03:01:48PM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit : I believe Torsten was referring to §4b of CC-BY-SA-2.x: You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom between CC BY 2.5, and CC BY 2.0, how about accepting CC BY 2.0 in

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, Am 25.01.13 15:07, schrieb Charles Plessy: There are also moin, netcdf-java, vlc, or wxmaxima, which either have an inaccurate copyright file or contain files licensed under CC-BY-(SA-)2.5 (and pinta with by-nc-nd-2.5). Note that I have not tried to be exhaustive in my search. I have to

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Christoph Egger
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: Alternatively, if we can