Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-17 Thread Diane Trout
> On Saturday, 16 September 2017 14:18:10 AEST Diane Trout wrote: > > My solution was to use build-profiles to flag the test dependency > > with > > !nocheck > > this is, of course, a very elegant solution and exactly what build > profiles > are for... > > I wonder though, is it really

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-17 Thread Stuart Prescott
Hi Diane & other science+python people, Thanks for spending time on pandas and statsmodels. They are two very valuable but very painful packages to work on. I've not looked at pandas and statsmodels packages carefully beyond "why hasn't pandas migrated this time!?" investigations but the

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 16.09.2017 22:59, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16 2017, Diane Trout wrote: >> python3-pandas: Pandas is not installable >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875723 > > I would have expected the rebuild of python packages affected by the > fpectl extension with a transition,