On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 21:39 +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> I agree that xfailing the tests *may* be a reasonable solution. I'm
> only saying that it should be done by someone with more idea than me
> of
> whether these particular tests are important, because blindly
> xfailing
> everything
I agree that xfailing the tests *may* be a reasonable solution. I'm
only saying that it should be done by someone with more idea than me of
whether these particular tests are important, because blindly xfailing
everything that fails is effectively not having tests.
If we do choose that
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 11:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Rebecca,
>
> Am Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:59:17AM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer:
> > (Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed
> > and it was
> > hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we
Hi Rebecca,
Am Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:59:17AM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer:
> (Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed and it was
> hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we don't get
> it back in we lose Spyder.)
as far as I know Diane has
(Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed and it
was hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we
don't get it back in we lose Spyder.)
On 05/02/2023 21:44, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
I currently have this in a state where it sometimes succeeds and
5 matches
Mail list logo
