Re: python3.3 status

2013-08-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, August 02, 2013 09:13:56 Scott Kitterman wrote: python3.3 is the default python3. We're going straight to dropping python3.2 from supported python3 versions. binNMUs were already done for morse- simulator,postgresql-9.1,yafaray,and znc after python3.3 became default. These issues

Re: python3.3 status

2013-08-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
python3.3 is the default python3. We're going straight to dropping python3.2 from supported python3 versions. binNMUs were already done for morse- simulator,postgresql-9.1,yafaray,and znc after python3.3 became default. These issues still remain: libguestfs - No longer FTBFS on amd64, but

Re: python3.3 status

2013-07-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, July 06, 2013 10:22:22 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 01:55:07 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Friday, June 21, 2013 01:30:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:53:40 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: Here's a further update on packages

Re: python3.3 status

2013-07-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, June 21, 2013 01:30:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:53:40 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: Here's a further update on packages pertaining to the 3.3 transition: libguestfs - No longer FTBFS on amd64, but does on i386, #710545, now builds for all python3

Re: python3.3 status

2013-07-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jul 03, 2013, at 01:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: Looking at where we are now, the open issues are down to #711761 and #711761. Don't forget #711761 and #711761. :) I don't think they are enough of a reason to hold back switching to python3.3 as default. My proposal is that once scipy

Re: python3.3 status

2013-07-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 02:04:08 PM Barry Warsaw wrote: On Jul 03, 2013, at 01:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: Looking at where we are now, the open issues are down to #711761 and #711761. Don't forget #711761 and #711761. :) Meh. #710545. Scott K I don't think they are enough of a

RE : python3.3 status

2013-07-03 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
Looking at where we are now, the open issues are down to #711761 and #711761. To my opinion, (I am the maintainer of pytango) this is not a problem if pytango is not available on s390. I forwarded the bug to the upstream with a patch, I am waiting for the approval of the upstream. Nevertheless

Re: python3.3 status

2013-07-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 06:15:11 PM PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Looking at where we are now, the open issues are down to #711761 and #711761. To my opinion, (I am the maintainer of pytango) this is not a problem if pytango is not available on s390. I forwarded the bug to the upstream

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:53:40 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: Here's a further update on packages pertaining to the 3.3 transition: libguestfs - No longer FTBFS on amd64, but does on i386, #710545, now builds for all python3 versions nuitka FTBFS unrepoducible pyepr builds successfully,

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Here's a further update on packages pertaining to the 3.3 transition: boost1.49 Fixed flufl.bounce builds now that zope.interface is updated hivex FTBFS fixed, dependencies fixed, nothing further to do. libguestfs - No longer FTBFS on amd64, but does on i386, #710545, now builds for all python3

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-18 Thread Tomasz Rybak
Dnia 2013-06-19, śro o godzinie 00:53 -0400, Scott Kitterman pisze: [ cut ] I've marked the things that I think block python3.3 as default a blocking the transition bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708536 pyopencl package fixing FTBFS #711926 (which block #708536) is

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-17 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hi, Gediminas Paulauskas mene...@pov.lt writes: Please also upload zope.component 3.11.0 at the same time, to match a big move of code to zope.interface = 3.8 Thanks, I have just uploaded these 4 packages. Cheers, -- Arnaud Fontaine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 03:13:38 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:48:45 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: More updates and added all the unknown packages from the transition tracker. Items marked as fixed in the

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-13 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 13 June 2013 07:01, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 03:13:38 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:48:45 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: More updates and added all the unknown

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-12 Thread Gediminas Paulauskas
2013/6/11 Arnaud Fontaine ar...@debian.org Hello, Arnaud Fontaine ar...@debian.org writes: I can sponsor zope.interface upload if that's ok for Gediminas. I have prepared zope.interface for upload and noticed that tests fail with python 3.3 because of a bug in zope.exceptions fixed in

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:48:45 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: More updates and added all the unknown packages from the transition tracker. Items marked as fixed in the last update have been removed. On Thursday, May 23, 2013

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-11 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hello, Arnaud Fontaine ar...@debian.org writes: I can sponsor zope.interface upload if that's ok for Gediminas. I have prepared zope.interface for upload and noticed that tests fail with python 3.3 because of a bug in zope.exceptions fixed in 4.0.1 (only 4.0.0.1 is currently available

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:46:05 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: Here's another update based on work I've done, noticed other people did, or responses to the last one of these I sent. It does not include work which I neither notice nor people told me about. Items marked as fixed in the last

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-07 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 07, 2013, at 05:27 PM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: zope.interface - Needs update to 4.0.2 or later Getting zope.interface updated would be helpful as well, but seems to need sponsoring. If someone has some sponsoring cycles available, please have a look. I can sponsor zope.interface

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 06:19:06 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: I've been working on this a bit ... On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 02:01:26 PM Jakub Wilk wrote: python3-defaults maintainer(s?) decided to make python3.3 a supported version without prior notice. Yay. Now we have dozens of packages

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-06 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com, 2013-06-06, 12:46: mpi4py, pyepr, pystemmer, python-llfuse, python-scipy, and python-astropy all needed a fixed cython, which is now available. pyepr builds successfully, but puts dbg extensions into wrong package: #708011 python-scipy FTBFS with new

Re: python3.3 status

2013-06-06 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com, 2013-06-06, 12:46: Did anyone file bugs for jwilk's FTBFS TODO packages? I've file them all, with one exception: I couldn't reproduce nuitka's FTBFS in a different build environment. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-24 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: Did anyone else fix stuff? cssutils FTBFS, needs rebuilt nosetests, then FTBFS #686340 Fixed. python-docutils FTBFS #681723 Excellently fixed by Jakub. pymarkups FTBFS TODO No longer FTBFS with the latest docutils.

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-24 Thread Simon Chopin
Quoting Scott Kitterman (2013-05-24 00:19:06) On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 02:01:26 PM Jakub Wilk wrote: [...] pytest FTBFS TODO Fixed signature.asc Description: signature

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-24 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 07, 2013, at 02:01 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: flufl.bounce FTBFS #707086 This one is really because of the ancient version of zope.interface in sid/jessie. It's not until z.i 4.0.2 that Python 3.3 support was added, although 4.0.5 is the latest version in the Cheeseshop. CC

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-24 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:24:20AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: On May 07, 2013, at 02:01 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: flufl.bounce FTBFS #707086 This one is really because of the ancient version of zope.interface in sid/jessie. It's not until z.i 4.0.2 that Python 3.3 support was added, although

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-24 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 24, 2013, at 05:48 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:24:20AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: On May 07, 2013, at 02:01 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: flufl.bounce FTBFS #707086 This one is really because of the ancient version of zope.interface in sid/jessie. It's not until

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-24 Thread Gediminas Paulauskas
Į will sync the rest of zope packages from ubuntu in a few days. Anyone able to upload? What is the latest snippet to add for python3 support?.. 2013.05.25 01:36, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org rašė: On May 24, 2013, at 05:48 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:24:20AM

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
I've been working on this a bit ... On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 02:01:26 PM Jakub Wilk wrote: python3-defaults maintainer(s?) decided to make python3.3 a supported version without prior notice. Yay. Now we have dozens of packages failing to build: boost1.49 FTBFS TODO boost1.50 FTBFS TODO

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Thanks Jakub, FWIW: cython produces broken code #681697 update WiP (for some reason did not build using python-dbg at all thus dh_install failed... will troubleshoot shortly) nuitka FTBFS TODO I believe fixed upstream -- if not -- will be, i.e. nothing to worry for the team -- Yaroslav O.

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2013-05-07, 14:01: Now we have dozens of packages failing to build: I should have said that I initially tested only packages build-depending on python3-all(-dev). There are also these, that build-depended only on the default version: pyinotify #692385