Re: subliminal

2017-09-25 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[drebs, 2017-09-23] > Hi, I am interested in updating the subliminal[2] package[1]. Is there > someone else already working on that? If not, what would be the process > for having it uploaded? (i am not a dm or dd) Should i send the source > package to this list? Would som

Re: subliminal

2017-09-23 Thread Diane Trout
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 18:35 -0300, drebs wrote: > Hi, I am interested in updating the subliminal[2] package[1]. Is > there > someone else already working on that? If not, what would be the > process > for having it uploaded? (i am not a dm or dd) Should i send the > source >

subliminal

2017-09-23 Thread drebs
Hi, I am interested in updating the subliminal[2] package[1]. Is there someone else already working on that? If not, what would be the process for having it uploaded? (i am not a dm or dd) Should i send the source package to this list? Would someone sponsor it? :) [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Re: #850098 subliminal: change of upstream structure

2017-01-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I don't work on any of those packages, but I think your logic makes sense. .hc Carl Suster: > I see that subliminal is currently using the tarballs from PyPI and then > patching in the source for the nautilus extension which is of course > absent from there. Also the Github-hosted

#850098 subliminal: change of upstream structure

2017-01-09 Thread Carl Suster
I see that subliminal is currently using the tarballs from PyPI and then patching in the source for the nautilus extension which is of course absent from there. Also the Github-hosted tarballs include a test suite which is not in the PyPI tarballs. It seems that the upstream nautilus