On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 09:59 +0100, benoit Rolland wrote:
> When using Xfce remotely,
>
> a kind of Gnome timeout occurs after a few minutes.
Please contact our support channels for help using Debian:
https://www.debian.org/support
They will be able to help you figure out this issue and
direct
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 11:22 -0500, Ali Ramzan wrote:
> We are currently using Debian Apache version 2.4.57-2, which has some
> vulnerabilities (Apache 2.4.x < 2.4.58 Multiple Vulnerabilities CVE-
> 2023-31122 CVE-2023-43622 CVE-2023-45802). I am trying to find out
> when the new version of Apache
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
piuparts is extracting data about dpkg alternatives for every package
it tests. It would be nice to have the data imported into UDD and
the results presented in a CGI on the UDD website.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: carnivore
X-Debbugs-CC: m...@qa.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
The carnivore system which tracks the activity of Debian members is
written in Python 2, which has been removed from Debian, so
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:05:24 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What could work is:
> run lintian on source
> for each arch in the packages's architectures (except all)
> run lintian on architecture packages + architecture 'all' packages
>
> But would that solve all issues?
I discovered
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The UDD list of BTS binary packages for the PTS started outputting some
incorrect package names. I am not sure if these are caused by bad data
in the BTS itself or if something has broken in the UDD
On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 02:04 +, Mae Miller wrote:
> Hi, I'm a longtime linux user but I'm getting oriented to the debian
> community and I was wondering what projects needed new eyes?
Pretty much every aspect of Debian (and FOSS) needs contributors.
We document most of the different ways to
On Sat, 2023-07-15 at 10:58 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> The version of dose-distcheck installed on quantz is very old (5.0.1-12,
> form oldoldstable). The version in bookworm is 7.0.0-1+b2. I can't tell
> yet whether more recent versions of dose fix the problem, but do you have
> plans for
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dose
X-Debbugs-CC: Ralf Treinen
The dose cron job has been producing these errors since 2023-07-02:
Subject: Cron nice -15 flock -n
/srv/qa.debian.org/lock/dose-job
On Sun, 2023-05-07 at 10:53 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> These are intentional. There are usually also Affects on some binary
> packages built from that source. The FTBFS makes the packages in sid
> uninstallable (due to dependencies on no longer available packages) and
> I want piuparts
attached the list of added bugs and their subjects.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
From b92ac52e895bf7f251511c34503ff1e406718f42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Wise
Date: Sun, 7 May 2023 00:02:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] Import 2023-05-07 00:02:15+00:00
---
debian-qa
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 12:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> For those like me who haven't heard of it:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/codesearch-cli
An alternative is apparently dcs-cli by Jakub Wilk:
https://github.com/jwilk/dcs-cli
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org
On Mon, 2023-04-24 at 19:53 +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> codesearch-cli
For those like me who haven't heard of it:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/codesearch-cli
It isn't in Debian as far as I can tell.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:12:09 -0400 Federico Grau wrote:
> Copying sf reply to Debian bug #1033632 , as requested by pabs, to enable
> Debian members to analyze.
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:35:03AM -0600, SourceForge.net Support & Ops wrote:
...
> > We've checked our logs for the past week and
On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 21:55 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I'm pasting here the piuparts bug template for this specific error
For future reference, here are the bug templates:
https://piuparts.debian.org/templates/mail/
Control: retitle -1 qa.debian.org: sourceforge redirector for debian/watch
files gets rate limited
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 07:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I added code to handle sf.net's rate limiting in the UDD importer, and
> triggered a refresh of all sf.net-hosted packages.
Excellent,
On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 07:14 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> There's specific code in the UDD uscan wrapper[1] to handle github's
> rate limiting. We could have something similar for either sf.net, or the
> sf.net redirector. Before I work on that, it would be great if someone
> could change the
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 08:05 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> For several days sf.php no longer works:
>
> ,
> > uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage
> > https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/synfig/ failed: 500 Error
> `
This issue is caused by the underlying
On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 20:49 +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Sorry maybe I wasn't clear enough, but my purpose was more to track packages
> facing such cases (a subset of my first pattern):
>
> chiark-scripts: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/fishdescriptor/__init__.py
Please file a feature
On Fri, 2023-03-17 at 16:22 +0300, Anatoliy Gunya wrote:
> omega-rpg package has the desktop file without a required field. I've
> prepared a fix for this bug at [1]. Is it possible to fix this package
> in the Bookworm release?
Since this change probably doesn't meet the freeze policy,
I think
On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 17:02 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I added the required support in tracker.debian.org
Personally I think we should replace the Ubuntu panel with a patches
panel, as I have done for the old PTS some years ago:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/glibc.html
This bug lists
On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 01:17 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> it would need to get the list of binary packages for a source and
> lint all of them with the same lintian call.
The usual way of running lintian after a build checks all binary
packages and the source at the same time. I think UDD should
On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 18:41 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I otherwise do not know how we can mark patches as forwarded when
> for example you send them directly to upstream via email or to a mailing
> list that has no public archive or similar.
Just as you can mark a BTS bug as forwarded to an
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:38:28 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> I would like to have a patches panel on the distro-tracker
The UDD database now contains analysis and metadata for the Debian
patches, so it might be useful to link to that instead where possible.
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-sea
On Sun, 2023-01-08 at 18:58 +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> I've added it now via
> https://salsa.debian.org/pkgutopia-team/debian-asgen-config/-/commit/4382a6c3aece0eef0c6f2c05279d61aa667ab601
> , so this issue should resolve itself very soon!
Could you add this hardcoding of suites,
On Sat, 2023-01-07 at 21:47 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I will file proper bugs for tracker and developer.php integration in
> a few days.
There is a proposal for a tracker patches panel:
https://bugs.debian.org/779400
I implemented it for the old PTS fairly easily, for eg:
On Sun, 2023-01-01 at 15:48 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I could be wrong, but my interpretation of the highlighted sentence
> is that refusal to try X to see that Y happens does not count
> as "unreproducible".
Agreed.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Control: reopen -1
On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 09:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> OK, I imported ports to ports_* tables.
Thanks, but they don't appear to have any data yet and
the derivatives tables still have ports data in them.
On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 1/ looking into it, I noticed that the source for packages in unreleased
> is not shipped. Is that expected?
This is a long-standing issue with the ports mini-dak setup.
The source packages are actually present in the archive but
there
On Fri, 2022-12-23 at 15:28 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Fixed (at least partially).
Thanks. I've added support to madison.cgi and sent an rmadison patch:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/commit/b259045e60b6f6f0f2f0b46d3c4f0d74afc3cf52
On Sat, 2022-12-10 at 11:49 +0100, Roland Clobus wrote:
> Since a few days all (non-archived) bugs, that have been reported by
> Philip Hands or me by looking at the output of openQA [1], have
> gotten usertags.
> You can find the list at [2].
I have updated our documentation about Debian QA
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
The listing of the kbtin testing-autorm also lists the colorized-logs
binary package but kbtin in testing has no colorized-logs binary since
it was split out of the kbtin source between stretch and
close 1024209
tags 984149 + patch
user debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
usertags 1024209 - riscv64
thanks
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 11:58 +0800, Yifan Xu wrote:
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System
> Followup-For: Bug #984149
Please submit followups for existing bug reports to the existing bugs
instead
Forwarding a response that went to the wrong place.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--- Begin Message ---
Source: genparse
Version: 0.9.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #984149
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 12:46 +, JunYuan Tan wrote:
> There is a merged upstream patch [1] that fixes this issue for riscv64.
I think this is the wrong approach, since it means that every new arch
that comes along needs to add a string for itself and the list of
strings grows longer and longer
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:20:56 +0200 B. Wech wrote:
> at LMDE (Linux Mint Debian Testing Edition) nautilus-image-converter starts as
> expected but if I tryed to run a conversion I got the following message:
>
> " '00023.jpg' cannot be rotated. Check whether you have permission to write to
> this
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:45:12 +0100 Siegfried Gevatter wrote:
> From: Ernst
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-image-converter/+bug/493322
>
> nautilus-image-converter is a great addon for nautilus, thanks for this one!
> Today, I wanted to resize some images. Some are rotated.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
X-Debbugs-CC: Thorsten Glaser
The UDD archived_* tables for archive.d.o/debian-archive/ are empty
even though config is available for importing the debian-archive mount.
Julien Cristau noted that
On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 06:52 +0800, Adrian Gallo wrote:
> I have read your website and am keen to join the Debian QA team.
Excellent and welcome to Debian!
> There are a lot of options to help out.
Indeed, most of them are mentioned on these pages:
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org
On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 22:18:37 +0200 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Perhaps www/bin/other_to_xml.py throws errors?
There aren't any errors visible in cron AFAICT.
PS: as mentioned before, the PTS is essentially abandoned.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
X-Debbugs-CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Aurelien Jarno
Currently the unofficial Debian ports archive is imported in UDD tables
named 'derivatives', but these days it is more of a Debian subproject.
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 10:29 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Thanks for that. For the record, I'm not involved in the package and
> the bug report was only a drive-by bug for an unimportant issue,
> so I don't have any intention to work on this myself.
PS: I just noticed the package is orp
On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 17:10 +0200, Thomas Uhle wrote:
> Now I have attached the patch to upstream's bug ticket as requested
> after recovering my Sourceforge account. Anyway, I don't have hope
> that there is going to happen much. Yet it would be good if Debian's
> libdbus-c++-* packages could
On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 22:59 +0200, Thomas Uhle wrote:
> I have prepared a patch for changing the order in which the libraries
> are built and to fix linking.
Thanks for the patch, please consider sending it upstream too,
even though upstream doesn't appear to be very active.
--
bye,
pabs
On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 00:17 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> There used to be a box (or something, I mostly use this with lynx)
> for testing migration status, but it’s apparently now missing.
The cron job has been crashing since the release team changed the
format of the HTML excuses page.
On Thu, 2022-08-11 at 17:25 -0400, Lucas Krupinski wrote:
> My problem is with the Debian 11.4 Live Image installer.
...
> If QA isn’t the correct list to submit this to, I would appreciate it
> someone could point me to a more appropriate list?
Please ask about this on the debian-live mailing
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 16:29 +0300, Dayana wrote:
> I want to join your team as a QA,
> I have no experience as a QA,
> but I would be happy to help.
Please take a look at our web and wiki pages:
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/Join
https://qa.debian.org/
On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 15:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> TLDR: I have plans to get fresh archive-wide data about lintian results
> in UDD (and then to any service that wants to consume it), but it's
> still WIP
This mail reminds me somewhat of buxy's debusine proposal/work.
> - coordinate the
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
When the Vcs-* links still point to alioth, instead of keeping the now
broken links, the tracker could point at alioth-archive.d.o instead.
Here is an example of a package that still has alioth Vcs-* fields:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ion
On Sun, 2022-05-29 at 23:29 +0100, Keiran Harcombe wrote:
> What would the process be for picking up the maintenance of the
> following packages on Debian; freedink, freedink-data, freedink-
> dfarc, freedink-dfarc-dbg, freedink-engine
This is documented in various places, but in short, rename
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 17:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yes, verifying signatures using obsolete keys or obsolete algorithms
> which are no longer supported in GnuPG 2.
and nothing other than GnuPG 1 supports these keys? It seems like it
would be a good idea for GnuPG 2 or other OpenPGP
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 17:33 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I expect some people who who keep GnuPG 1.4 around for handling some
> weird legacy archival data to be upset by this. If there are specific
> needs, perhaps we can find other ways that they can meet them safely.
> Or, perhaps they
On Sat, 2022-02-26 at 10:52 +0530, Anish Kumbhar wrote:
> I am Anish Devendra Kumbhar, 1 st Year B.Tech student in CSE.
> I know C and C++, and am learning web development and python.
> I am really curious to know about open source and its contribution process.
> This will be my first experience
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-hg/issues/48
On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 07:31 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
This appears to be caused by git 1:2.35.1-1 in unstable,
the autopkgtests regressed
Package: adequate
Version: 0.15.6
Severity: normal
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: retitle -2 adequate: check systemd files for invalid users/groups
Control: retitle -3 adequate: check init scripts for invalid users/groups
dbus files, systemd units and init scripts can reference users or
groups.
On Mon, 2021-12-27 at 18:13 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It's phrased as question, not as you say. And I can certainly change the
> wording but then it's no longer an "action item" and I find it hard to
> keep the entry in its current place. Thus I prefer to restrict the cases
> where we show
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 09:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> When the List-Archive header exists and contains a URL, the link could
> be to that URL. This works for Debian lists and mailman lists and
> probably other types of lists too.
PS: I note that the mailman3 archiver uses
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 09:23 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The tracker doesn't receive emails via mailing lists, it gets sent a
> direct copy from the various services.
Ah. That is the case for Debian but maybe not for other instances,
so I think this could be useful for some distros
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 21:56 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why do you want a lists.debian.org link when you already have a
> tracker.debian.org link pointing to the same content?
I don't want a tracker.d.o link. Mainly I want a link with a Message-ID
in it, which are more likely to be long-term
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Currently the only place that testing migration mails are publicly
archived is on the tracker.debian.org news section. There are probably
other mails in a similar situation. It would be nice to be able to go
from such a mail in local email archives
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
In the news emails, please show the Message-ID header and make the
value inside the angled brackets <> a link to the Debian lists
msgid-search. For example [1] should link to [2].
1.
user autoc...@packages.debian.org
usertags 993870 - autoconf-2.71
thanks
user autoc...@packages.debian.org
usertags 993870 + autoconf-2.71
thanks
Control: tags -1 + sid
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 12:14:21 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> quesoglc fails to build from source in unstable.
This seems to have been caused by the update to autoconf, it does not
occur with bookworm and upgrading autoconf to sid causes the issue.
Looking at the config.log,
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 8:24 PM s3v wrote:
> Can you please manually remove cruft packages from the archive so that
> translators can concentrate on the *real* descriptions without wasting
> their time in translating old descriptions?
The source packages have no descriptions, only binary packages
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:51 AM Armando Marcos Peña Sejas wrote:
> SOLICITO LISTA DE PAQUETES DE DEBIAN.
Please contact our support services for help using Debian.
[Traducción automática] Póngase en contacto con nuestros servicios de
soporte para obtener ayuda sobre el uso de Debian.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:17 PM Davide Prina wrote:
> So, for example, in PTS (or in a bug report) can be reported to the DD:
> 1) that the package home page has some problem
> 2) a possible solution (in the repology page above)
There is already a bug report about this. In short, this isn't
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:12 AM Russell Coker wrote:
> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=russell%40coker.com.au
>
> In the above page it has both versions 2:2.20210203-3 and 2:2.20210203-4 in
> the testing and unstable columns, what does that mean?
I see 2:2.20210203-3 in the testing
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:24 PM Scott C. MacCallum wrote:
> I'm available to help.
Excellent, thanks for your interest!
Debian has a lot of different QA related tools and services you could work on:
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org
Probably the highest impact one is lintian, a tool for
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:51 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> remember that tracker is source-based
...
> supports package lookup prefixed with src: or bin:
...
> I would honestly oppose "hiding" and old source package
I think that makes this a wontfix bug, any further thoughts?
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 12:37 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> updating from the latest HEAD of:
> https://gitlab.com/jenslody/gnome-shell-extension-openweather I do see it
> working but I get exclamation mark with the icons as in the attached
> screenshot. Not sure if this is what is expected. I
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:07:35 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> In the links panel please add at the end an "Other distros" or "Other
> distro packages" link (with title "provided by Repology") pointing at
> the packages list for the Repology project corresponding
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
Control: retitle -1 DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default,
add option to show them
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 6:00 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by
> default, perhaps with a parameter to sh
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:54 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I think above perfectly explains why the original issue of the ticket
> occurs, and it's by design.
> So I add the "wontfix" tag to this ticket.
The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by
default, perhaps with
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:27 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I think this can explain why an old version of package is still in
> archive, but still cannot explain why it appears in *experimental*
> column in DDPO page.
This simply because DDPO just reflects what is in the archive, if you
grep the
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Shimizu wrote:
> So what's ESO?
A package which has this in the Packages file:
Extra-Source-Only: yes
dak uses this to indicate that the source package is only kept around
for license compliance purposes because another package still has a
Built-Using
Package: gnome-shell-extension-weather
Version: 0~20170402.git34506a6-2
Followup-For: Bug #969273
Control: retitle -1 gnome-shell-extension-weather: fails to load: TypeError:
this.actor.reparent is not a function
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: usertags -1 + bittenby
I have this issue too
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:37 PM Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Would it make sense to standardize the current proposal as DEP-12, perhaps
> with
> a limited set of uncontroversial and widely used fields?
I wonder if storing metadata (including Homepage, debian/watch,
debian/upstream/*) about the
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:12 AM Nicholas Tsimerekis wrote:
> I've been trying to find an opportunity to contribute to the Debian project.
There are many places to contribute and many things that need doing,
some are documented here:
https://www.debian.org/intro/help
On Sat, 2020-07-04 at 18:08 +0200, richard lucassen wrote:
> Rereading it, I don't know if this issue was present in 2.9 or earlier.
> I just noticed it while testing the new version.
Would you mind downgrading to 2.9 and testing it?
You can install it from Debian buster or snapshot.d.o
--
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 11:15:30 +0200 richard lucassen wrote:
> Ok, two remaining cometic issues in 2.11 than :-)
Sounds like the issue is fixed then, marked it as fixed.
> # ifup bond0
> /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave: 39: echo: echo: I/O error
> /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave: 39: echo:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 22:55:03 +0200 richard lucassen wrote:
> $ dpkg -l | grep ifenslave
> ii ifenslave2.10+nmu2
>
> The lines "bond-slaves" and "bond-primary" still do not work:
Please retry your test with ifenslave 2.11.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Sun, 2020-06-28 at 18:17 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> That would be easy. What should that API look like? Would returning all
> the info for a given source package, as json, be enough?
Probably just the same API as the existing rmadison APIs. Since there
is already a udd madison script,
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:18 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Then, I'd argue that that's one valid case for the package to stay in
> the main archive instead. I.e. use a manually build -dbg package.
>
> But this is just my own opinion, I don't think there is anything
> resembling a rule on matters
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 9:56 AM Bill Allombert wrote:
> "Package has a Suggests on pari-gp-dbgsym which cannot be satisfied on amd64"
>
> However pari-gp-dbgsym exists in buster-debug
>
> So is it a debcheck bug or something that can be fixed in the package ?
It is a bug in debcheck, it does not
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:15 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Unfortunately I need to do a manual install anyway, I don't have root
> access on the UDD machine and thus cannot install a .deb.
Another option would be to ask DSA to install the backport once it
reaches buster-backports.
--
bye,
pabs
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
sources.debian.org shows the source code of packages available in all
releases going back to hamm. For removed packages that were in releases
hamm or later it would be useful to have the "browse source code" link
available for folks who are working
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:09 PM Holger Levsen wrote:
> The information we would like to have integrated into tracker.d.o is a
> link to .buildinfo files for source packages, based on the architecture
> the build was done.
...
> https://buildinfos.debian.net/buildinfo-pool/ provides a pool
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:07:35 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> https://repology.org/tools/project-by?repo=debian_$suite_type=srcname_page=project_versions=$srcpkg
I think we also want the noautoresolve=on parameter to "Disable the
automatic ambiguity resolution (e.g. show list of target
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Repology is a project that monitors a huge number of package
repositories and other sources comparing packages versions across them
and gathering other information. It shows you in which repositories a
given project is packaged, which version is the
On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:14:21 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> so once Repology pull request #615 (adding per-package problem
> reports) is merged and deployed on the repology website
The PRs haven't been merged but they have been closed and further
discussion has moved to this issue:
https://gith
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 7:30 PM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Regarding DUCK it seems not to be very active looking there:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/duck
> and its VCS is not responding.
> Perhaps I will consider another Debian tool then...
The maintainer is still active and responds to email,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:39 AM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> I also working on a tool that tries checking (and suggest updates) to a given
> list of URLs: bad links, different cases of redirections, replacing http by
> https, etc.
There are a lot of these sorts of tools (DUCK is the main one as you
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:51 PM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> As a companion for instance to the Debian Trends and the Debian Janitor, here
> is
> a small prototype/proposal to facilitate going through a list of packages that
> have passed a packaging expiration date in some way. To be more precise,
Hi Simon,
I see duck.debian.net is down, the web server gives connection refused.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:21 PM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Those are binary packages that the glibc source package can build but that
> it only builds on non-release architectures... so indeed the binary
> packages are unknown by packages.debian.org which only knows about
> packages available on
Package: adequate
Version: 0.15.2
Severity: wishlist
Manual pages can contain references (using .so or .mso) to files that
can be included in the parent manual page. Those files can be at an
absolute path or a path relative to the base manual page path for the
current language or to the manual
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:46:39 +0200 Michael Vogt wrote:
> * add XPM term that contains a mangled version of the pkgname where
> all "-" are replaced with "_" to workaround that the queryparser
> considers "-" a special char
I know it is a long time ago, but do you know what the purpose
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
The fixtures reference testing/updates but with bullseye that suite has
been renamed to testing-security. The fixtures in the code need to be
updated and then updated on the live server. I've no idea how to do the
latter, which is why I'm filing this
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 3:42 PM Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> Do you know why this is happening and what to do about it?
> It seems to me that the machine on which DMD runs is hosted at a US
> university [2]. Do you think it might be due to that? And if so, how can
> this be mitigated? Can this service
1 - 100 of 737 matches
Mail list logo
