On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:00:14PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
On 6/4/06, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently, yes, it is! How's this for irony. The QA upload of
0.1.2.2-4 reverted the changes from 0.1.2.2-3 and broke the package!
Funny.
How's that? I just took what was in
On 6/5/06, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue is that I uploaded -3; it was not a QA upload. My changes in
-3 seem to have been omitted from the QA upload of -4. See (far) below
for the changelog from my -3 upload.
Sure, I read the changelog before composing my previous
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 361603 0.1.2.2-4
Bug#361603: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: cast from pointer to integer of different size
Bug marked as found in version 0.1.2.2-4.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
found 361603 0.1.2.2-4
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-09 21:11]:
* Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-09 13:07]:
It should be noted that this bug only affects 64-bit targets. This
patch is untested on 64-bit targets, but should fix the issue.
This works, thanks.
On 6/4/06, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
found 361603 0.1.2.2-4
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-09 21:11]:
* Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-09 13:07]:
It should be noted that this bug only affects 64-bit targets. This
patch is untested on 64-bit
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 10:45:16AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
On 6/4/06, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
found 361603 0.1.2.2-4
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-09 21:11]:
* Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-09 13:07]:
It should be noted that this
On 6/4/06, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently, yes, it is! How's this for irony. The QA upload of
0.1.2.2-4 reverted the changes from 0.1.2.2-3 and broke the package!
Funny.
How's that? I just took what was in unstable and rebuilt it. I don't go
reverting things. Strange in
7 matches
Mail list logo