Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 21/01/2008, Paul Wise wrote:
network-manager needs a binNMU on all arches because it still depends
on libnl1-pre8 on some architectures and libnl1-pre6 on others. The
new package name is libnl1.
Speaking of which, it isn't built everywhere, so you might want to set a
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:32:03PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
I do understand that derivative distributions such as Ubuntu do put
their own release entries in there. I imagine the Ubuntu users
understand that and can differentiate the Ubuntu release from the
Debian one in
Hi Release Team,
As far as i can tell, nobody has brought up upgrading the default
Python to 2.5 as a release goal. Joss outlined the steps necessary for
the transition here:
http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20071005.180427.1dddb386.en.html
and the list of bugs that need to be fixed to
On Jan 21, 2008 3:24 PM, Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and the list of bugs that need to be fixed to work with python as 2.5
is here:
http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20071005.180427.1dddb386.en.html
Er, how do i clipboarded? The correct link is:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:39:13PM -0700, Debian testing watch wrote:
FYI: The status of the em8300 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.16.3-1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/he
On 21/01/2008, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
I feel slightly puzzled by this package removal. OK, there is a bug
filed against the package, with severity serious.
Then don't be puzzled any longer.
But the bug is tagged unreproducible, and the submitter did not
reply to my last questions. Is there
Hi Nico and others,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:31:39PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for libcdio some time ago.
CVE-2007-6613[0]:
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the print_iso9660_recurse function in
| iso-info
Julien Goodwin wrote:
* mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk - Ditto, but a transition for the below
* icedove-locale-uk - Hasn't been updated for the 2.0 release (9 months ago)
Hi,
too bad i didn't spottet that one myself.. however, the locaes for 2.0
are now part of the icedove-l10n locale package
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Boullis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-22 00:40]:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:31:39PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately the vulnerability described above is not important enough
to get it fixed via regular security update in Debian stable. It does
not warrant a
Quoting Nicolas Boullis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
bug moreinfo have helpped? Or should I have downgraded its severity
for lack of information?
I would have downgraded the bug to important, based on the assumption that
in the package maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for
release
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 21/01/2008, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
I feel slightly puzzled by this package removal. OK, there is a bug
filed against the package, with severity serious.
Then don't be puzzled any longer.
But the bug is tagged unreproducible, and the submitter did not
reply to my
11 matches
Mail list logo
