Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
[ can we upload OCaml 3.11 to unstable? ]
I can see that pcre3 is blocking a lot of packages in unstable from
migrating to testing (including OCaml-related ones). I think we should
at least wait for this transition to complete.
Any hints on when this will be done?
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:23:37PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Lenny is now out, so I think it is time to decide how to proceed with what
was discussed during DC8. Is the release team still ok with the idea of
keeping orphaned packages out of testing? how should it be done? via
severity:
Would those who have an interest in this topic please test the patch
in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=97;bug=514807;mbox=yes
and report if it improves things for them? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi releasers,
can you please provide me direction on how to get a small bug fix in
the next point release of lenny? This bug was known before lenny
release, but since I was waiting for 2.7.STABLE3-4.1 to get in testing
(it included a security fix), I could not prepare a new upload in time
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:29:49AM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
can you please provide me direction on how to get a small bug fix in the
next point release of lenny? This bug was known before lenny release, but
since I was waiting for 2.7.STABLE3-4.1 to get in testing (it included a
* Sune Vuorela [Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:51:53 +0100]:
The reverse dep, jack-audio-connection-kit, dropped .la files and arts
.la files references them. Please binNMU arts on all archs.
Version is 1.5.9-2
It seems arts was binNMUed on all arches 2 weeks ago for this issue, and
made it into
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit :
Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
- the X server,
- evdev input module and
- a framebuffer video module.
Anything else?
XKB data, a number of libraries, a fixed font, I guess.
Currently GTK+
* Luigi Gangitano [Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:29:49 +0100]:
Hi releasers,
can you please provide me direction on how to get a small bug fix in the
next point release of lenny? This bug was known before lenny release, but
since I was waiting for 2.7.STABLE3-4.1 to get in testing (it included a
On Monday 16 February 2009 12:15:37 Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Sune Vuorela [Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:51:53 +0100]:
The reverse dep, jack-audio-connection-kit, dropped .la files and arts
.la files references them. Please binNMU arts on all archs.
Version is 1.5.9-2
It seems arts was binNMUed on
Hi,
Not sure exactly what info we should be providing for transitions, but here
goes.
I propose a library transition for libcommoncpp2 to match a new upstream
soname (which has already been transitioned via experimental)
libcommoncpp2-1.6-0 (sid)
Reverse Depends:
twinkle
libzrtpcpp-1.3-0
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:07 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
I don’t have anything right now that I’d like to put in these packages,
so the thing they need the most is testing. I can upload them to s-p-u
as soon as you want.
If SRM do not
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:16 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit :
Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
- the X server,
- evdev input module and
- a framebuffer video module.
Anything else?
XKB
Vincent Danjean wrote:
3) perhaps, try to push what is available in lenny backport into a
point-release
of lenny. This will depends on how many bug fix are present, how intrusive
the changes are, the release maintainers opinion, ...
For me, 3 is not the more important. Work on
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:49:11PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:16 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
XKB data, a number of libraries, a fixed font, I guess.
Some sort of XKB data will probably be needed by console-setup, AIUI
(although looking closer it seems that the
Hello,
As you all know, lenny is released. It is time now to migrate lapack 3.2.0
to unstable. There was no shlib bump, so this migration should be safe,
UNLESS the library has changes in the API/ABI in spite of the SONAME not
changing. Does anyone know whether this is really the case? We
I want to see the patch first. I don't agree with the snippet
proposed in the bug report.
The snippet in the bug report is a simple revert of the change that
broke resolvconf.
The proposed change is to add a PATH definition including /usr/sbin:
--- squid.orig 2009-02-16
* Sylvestre Ledru sylvestre.le...@inria.fr [2009-02-16 14:58]:
As you all know, lenny is released. It is time now to migrate lapack 3.2.0
to unstable. There was no shlib bump, so this migration should be safe,
UNLESS the library has changes in the API/ABI in spite of the SONAME not
I've forwarded lunar's message to the directfb ML (directfb-...@directfb.org)
and got the following reply:
-
From: Niels Roest npro...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:47:00 +0100
To: Davide Viti zino...@tiscali.it
Subject: Re: [directfb-dev] [lu...@debian.org: Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 17:26 +0100, Davide Viti wrote:
So I see the issue, I also see patches floating around (such as
mentioned by Colin Watson e.g.) and I'm also willing to but effort in
this to get it working again.
Thing is, with the submitted patch, I do not see someone at GTK
Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 12:48 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:07 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
If SRM do not object I think it would be nice to have them there ASAP so
we can start testing them.
Unfortunately a new GTK+ version needs to be uploaded
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Vincent Danjean wrote:
3) perhaps, try to push what is available in lenny backport into a
point-release
of lenny. This will depends on how many bug fix are present, how intrusive
the changes are, the release maintainers opinion, ...
For me, 3 is not the more
Hi,
just to say that I made a patch in order to get the last version of gtk
working with directfb. This pach is available here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=126611action=view
Probably not perfect, but at least with this patch GTK is compiling and
running. (I had some graphical
[No CC please, thanks]
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
Something like a DEP about handling of orphaned packages. Do you want
to start that? :-)
No offence, but DEPs sound like a lot of unneeded bureaucracy to me. A
proper RFC should cover all the needs without making it boring and too
long.
[No CC please, thank]
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:23:37PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Lenny is now out, so I think it is time to decide how to proceed with
what was discussed during DC8. Is the release team still ok with the idea
of keeping orphaned packages out of
On 2009-02-16 15:44, Raphael Geissert wrote:
The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them
from the archive.
+1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
thanks and cheers,
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2009-02-16 15:44, Raphael Geissert wrote:
The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them
from the archive.
+1
I'm struggling a little with this. Obviously I'm the first person to
want to see cruft removed and I realize we
Hi,
Please remove AND freeze the following source packages from testing:
gnome-libs 1.4.2-37
libnet0 1.0.2a-7
imlib 1.9.15-7
Please also remove the following r(b)depends from testing:
gnome-libs:
powershell 0.9-8
soundtracker 0.6.8-2
libnet0:
nemesis 1:1.4-1
paketto 1.10-7
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org wrote:
I'm struggling a little with this.
Same.
For example defoma has 113 rbdepends 148 rdepends. Removing all of
them would likely remove all fonts from Debian. I don't think it is
acceptable to break testing this much.
On 16/02/09 at 15:44 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
[No CC please, thank]
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:23:37PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Lenny is now out, so I think it is time to decide how to proceed with
what was discussed during DC8. Is the release team still
On 16/02/09 at 15:31 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
[No CC please, thanks]
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
Something like a DEP about handling of orphaned packages. Do you want
to start that? :-)
No offence, but DEPs sound like a lot of unneeded bureaucracy to me. A
proper RFC should
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
Now, back to the topic. We have a problem, which is:
We have too many orphaned packages.
Those orphaned packages are orphaned either:
(A) because they are 'crap' (poor quality/useless software, or
software for which better
32 matches
Mail list logo
