On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Max Vozeler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:51:04PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
even more if it is loop-aes which show a long history of
hostily of the module owner versus linux-2.6 upstream.
That's not true.
There are several reasons why loop-AES has not
Christian Hammers wrote:
Am Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:00:36 +0200
schrieb Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
Christian Hammers c...@debian.org (25/07/2009):
Nobody answered so I'm going to upload MySQL this evening and then
file bug report with priority serious against the 142 packages
currently
Hello,
Nicolas Bouillis wrote:
When lebrun tried to build vlc 1.0.0-1 for sparc, it failed earlier.
It apparently could not find libhal-dev or libdbus-1-dev, while they
apparently were correctly installed. I have no idea what happened
then.
It was a bug in dbus (#537125) where a
Dear Stable Release Managers,
I would request you to please consider the attached fix as an update
to the python-numpy package in Lenny. (Fixes a missing symlink).
Thank you.
Kumar
Index: debian/python-numpy.links
===
---
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:42:46AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I would request you to please consider the attached fix as an update
to the python-numpy package in Lenny. (Fixes a missing symlink).
Please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
please unblock libpng 1.2.38-1 (udeb)
Changes:
libpng (1.2.38-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* Fix out-of-date-standards-version
* Update upstream homepage
Closes: 536474
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi Arthur,
At DebConf, the release team has discussed the state of the various Debian
ports and their viability for squeeze, and a number of concerns were
expressed about alpha.
I've added a couple more serious issues to the list on
Hi,
there are some issues in the hppa port that currently let us doubt whether
we should continue to carry on that port to next stable. Apart the fact
that hppa is no longer buyable as new, there are quite a few technical
issues.
You know your porters mailing list best, but I want to highlight
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Bartha...@not.so.argh.org wrote:
You know your porters mailing list best, but I want to highlight some of
the issues:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2009/07/msg2.html
I can't comment on this issue. I hope Dave can?
On Thu, July 30, 2009 15:04, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please unblock libpng 1.2.38-1 (udeb)
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:48:54PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
The botan library snafu has been resolved. It looks like the package
needs to wait for the latest botan and sqlite, and something weird
happened on the hppa buildd which I *hope* is not the beginning of
another horrible round of
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:05:05AM -0300, UlisesVitulli wrote:
I've found a problem which breaks functionality on one of my packages
and I've prepared a patch to solve it.
It's really very simply as you may find attached.
Hi,
That's fine. Please upload to SPU.
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
When do the release team plan to start publishing approved release
goals? Any hope of having this done now during debconf?
Hi Peter,
Apologies for the delay in replying. There should be a notification to
Hi -release,
There is a minor security problem with python-django in stable; Nion
recommended the fix went this way instead of stable-security as it does
not affect typical installations. The patch is upstream-blessed.
The revelant changelog entry is:
python-django (1.0.2-1+lenny1)
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Is this patch a valid candidate for inclusion in the next point
release?
Hi Julian,
I'm afraid we can't accept this:
* There's a change to the uploaders (which is a bit useless for a stable
point release)
* We don't really
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:40:35PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Please do so nlkt 0.3.2.1-3 fixing FTBFS bug can migrate to testing.
E-mail to sparc buildd was sent at Jul 18 and received no answer.
Hi Eugene,
It seems that this comes back from w-b:
nlkt: has uninstallable
Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:40:35PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Please do so nlkt 0.3.2.1-3 fixing FTBFS bug can migrate to testing.
E-mail to sparc buildd was sent at Jul 18 and received no answer.
Hi Eugene,
It seems that this comes back from w-b:
nlkt: has
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 05:29:50PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Is this patch a valid candidate for inclusion in the next point
release?
Hi Julian,
I'm afraid we can't accept this:
* There's a change to the
On Thu, July 30, 2009 16:58, Chris Lamb wrote:
There is a minor security problem with python-django in stable; Nion
recommended the fix went this way instead of stable-security as it does
not affect typical installations. The patch is upstream-blessed.
The revelant changelog entry is:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
python-django (1.0.2-1+lenny1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Add patch to fix issue with a maliciously crafted URL gaining
access to any file on the filesystem (Closes: #539134)
Please go ahead.
Uploaded; thanks :)
Regards,
--
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Bartha...@not.so.argh.org wrote:
You know your porters mailing list best, but I want to highlight some of
the issues:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2009/07/msg2.html
I can't comment on this issue. I hope Dave can?
Over the past few
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:44 PM, John David
Anglind...@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Bartha...@not.so.argh.org wrote:
You know your porters mailing list best, but I want to highlight some of
the issues:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Manoj Srivastavasriva...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
Squeeze.
Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
but I have not discussed this with him)
Hi,
I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
Squeeze.
Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
but I have not discussed this with him)
Issues to be solved:
(a) Get all Debian patches to the reference security
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:44:03PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Bartha...@not.so.argh.org wrote:
You know your porters mailing list best, but I want to highlight some of
the issues:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2009/07/msg2.html
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
In your opinion, what is the most stable kernel configuration that
should be run on the buildds?
If the buildd has to run a SMP kernel, then 2.6.22.19 as patched for gsyprf11.
There is a minor issue wrt setting the RTC at startup, but it can be
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Timeline
Based on feedback of the community on the plan to freeze in December
2009 and the ambituous Release Goals we set for ourselves, we are
revisiting the decision to freeze December 2009.
We'll be consulting all
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Given that build-dependencies weren't changed since 0.3.2.1-2 that was
built successfully and 0.3.2.1-3 that failed in the middle of the run, I
think it's another buildd issue.
Thanks for the try, I will return with another give back request in
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 23:18 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Given that build-dependencies weren't changed since 0.3.2.1-2 that was
built successfully and 0.3.2.1-3 that failed in the middle of the run, I
think it's another buildd
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:49:57PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:42:46AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I would request you to please consider the attached fix as an update
to the python-numpy package in Lenny. (Fixes a missing symlink).
Please go ahead.
Thank you. It
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:52:25AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:28, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
cpuburn 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb.
It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems!
Could you please hint it?
Le Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
Timeline
Based on feedback of the community on the plan to freeze in December
2009 and the ambituous Release Goals we set for ourselves, we are
revisiting the decision to freeze December 2009.
We'll be consulting
'Move of packages' long descriptions into a separate translated
package list, which will facilitate their translation and also
provide a smaller footprint for embedded systems thanks to smaller
Packages files.
Where i can find a example like about ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
but I have not discussed this with him)
I will be involved in this, but I find it difficult to get enough free time.
Issues to be
Hello
Am Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:35:09 +0200
schrieb Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
Christian Hammers wrote:
Am Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:00:36 +0200
schrieb Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
Christian Hammers c...@debian.org (25/07/2009):
Nobody answered so I'm going to upload MySQL this
35 matches
Mail list logo
