Re: An possible update for proftpd in lenny

2009-09-09 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: As reflected in http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3284 upstream has recently fixed a long standing issue in proftpd which negatively impacts its performances. I would be inclined to propose a PU but I'd like having

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: * How many big transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier? One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pick). Oh, no. Not again. It

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something we'll want for

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Andreas Barth
* Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) [090909 12:37]: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something we'll want for squeeze, depending

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 14:42:52 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: This might

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 14:04 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : If not at X side, is it a possibility to either (a) add the new memory manager to lenny (I assume not), or (b) tell the users you need to upgrade your kernel first (and make the new X pre-depending somehow on the kernel).

Bug#545855: nmu: openoffice.org-voikko/3.1-2

2009-09-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal As usual the needed bin-NMU round for openoffice.org-voikko against a new OOo... nmu openoffice.org-voikko_3.1-2 . None . -m rebuild against openoffice.org 3.1.1 dw

Bug#545855: marked as done (nmu: openoffice.org-voikko/3.1-2)

2009-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:24:45 +0200 with message-id 4aa7e4dd.1040...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#545855: nmu: openoffice.org-voikko/3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #545855, regarding nmu: openoffice.org-voikko/3.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: asd

2009-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 499701 release.debian.org, release-notes Bug #499701 [release-notes] [etchnhalf releasenotes] dvgrab is broken with .24 Bug reassigned from package 'release-notes' to 'release.debian.org,release-notes'. user

Update on Shibboleth package transition

2009-09-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Unfortunately, a combination of a libtool *.la file from Xerces-C and some build dependency problems as a result caused the Shibboleth transition to get entangled with the icu transition. Also, during the NEW periods, upstream released several security advisories affecting xmltooling and

Re: Bug#545848: python-enchant: Typo in method name in enchant/checker/__init__.py

2009-09-09 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
fixed 545848 1.5.3-1 thanks bts [Tapio Lehtonen, 2009-09-09] from enchant.checker import SpellChecker checker = SpellChecker(ufi_FI) checker.add_to_personal(usomeword) Tapio: it's fixed in 1.5.x (currently in testing) Please use 'checker.dict.add(usomeword)' directly for now. Release

Re: serveez: proposed update for stable and oldstable

2009-09-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 01:43 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 18:43 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: I've prepared a fix for a buffer overflow in serveez (Bug#540657), which [...] I've now uploaded the package for lenny, but

Re: Bug#545848: python-enchant: Typo in method name in enchant/checker/__init__.py

2009-09-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 22:48 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: Release managers: can I upload pyenchant 1.4.2-3+lenny1 with this patch: | --- enchant/checker/__init__.py.orig2009-09-09 22:42:20.949143895 +0200 | +++ enchant/checker/__init__.py 2009-09-09 22:42:35.564143851 +0200 |

Re: Comments regarding boost1.40_1.40.0-1_amd64.changes

2009-09-09 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hello Torsten, On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:34:26PM +, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi Maintainer, Version: 1.40.0-1 That would be the 3rd upstream version of boost in unstable after boost1.38 and boost1.39 and this needs a lot of ressources (mirror disks, network bandwidth, buildd and