On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
As reflected in http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3284 upstream
has recently fixed a long standing issue in proftpd which negatively
impacts its performances. I would be inclined to propose a PU but
I'd like having
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
* How many big transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When
should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier?
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (meaning
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pick).
Oh, no. Not again. It
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
we'll want for
* Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) [090909 12:37]:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something
we'll want for squeeze, depending
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 14:42:52 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
This might
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with
their Q4 2009 release (meaning
Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 14:04 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
If not at X side, is it a possibility to either (a) add the new memory
manager to lenny (I assume not), or (b) tell the users you need to
upgrade your kernel first (and make the new X pre-depending somehow
on the kernel).
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
As usual the needed bin-NMU round for openoffice.org-voikko against
a new OOo...
nmu openoffice.org-voikko_3.1-2 . None . -m rebuild against openoffice.org
3.1.1
dw
Your message dated Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:24:45 +0200
with message-id 4aa7e4dd.1040...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#545855: nmu: openoffice.org-voikko/3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #545855,
regarding nmu: openoffice.org-voikko/3.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 499701 release.debian.org, release-notes
Bug #499701 [release-notes] [etchnhalf releasenotes] dvgrab is broken with .24
Bug reassigned from package 'release-notes' to
'release.debian.org,release-notes'.
user
Unfortunately, a combination of a libtool *.la file from Xerces-C and some
build dependency problems as a result caused the Shibboleth transition to
get entangled with the icu transition. Also, during the NEW periods,
upstream released several security advisories affecting xmltooling and
fixed 545848 1.5.3-1
thanks bts
[Tapio Lehtonen, 2009-09-09]
from enchant.checker import SpellChecker
checker = SpellChecker(ufi_FI)
checker.add_to_personal(usomeword)
Tapio: it's fixed in 1.5.x (currently in testing)
Please use 'checker.dict.add(usomeword)' directly for now.
Release
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 01:43 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 18:43 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
I've prepared a fix for a buffer overflow in serveez (Bug#540657), which
[...]
I've now uploaded the package for lenny, but
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 22:48 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
Release managers: can I upload pyenchant 1.4.2-3+lenny1 with this patch:
| --- enchant/checker/__init__.py.orig2009-09-09 22:42:20.949143895
+0200
| +++ enchant/checker/__init__.py 2009-09-09 22:42:35.564143851 +0200
|
Hello Torsten,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:34:26PM +, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi Maintainer,
Version: 1.40.0-1
That would be the 3rd upstream version of boost in unstable after boost1.38
and
boost1.39 and this needs a lot of ressources (mirror disks, network bandwidth,
buildd and
16 matches
Mail list logo