Processing changes file: drbd8_8.0.14-2+lenny1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: drbd8_8.0.14-2+lenny1_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: drbd8_8.0.14-2+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: drbd8_8.0.14-2+lenny1_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:54:33PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Dropping 8.3 will require migrating old strict rev-dep packages
to the new policy and possibly patching for using a modern Tcl (default
or 8.4 at least). Eventually, some packages will be dropped, because too
Hi.
Excerpts from Philipp Kern's message of Dom Mar 14 17:42:58 -0300 2010:
(...)
We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:24:51 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
The xmms2 packagers team (or at least me and some xmms2 devolopers) like
to see xmms2 0.7DrNo in squeeze. The transition is blocked by a FTBFS on
hppa [1] and a segmentation fault of gcc on armel. Both issues are not
xmms2's
Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 15:07 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:24:51 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
The xmms2 packagers team (or at least me and some xmms2 devolopers) like
to see xmms2 0.7DrNo in squeeze. The transition is blocked by a FTBFS on
hppa
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42:58 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
could write up a corresponding bug report filed against release.debian.org,
preferably
[I intended to CC -release in my previous message, but apparently
forgot...]
В 13:48 +0100 на 16.03.2010 (вт), Gerfried Fuchs написа:
* Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org [2010-03-16 08:33:53 CET]:
В 08:05 +0100 на 16.03.2010 (вт), Gerfried Fuchs написа:
I wonder, why only for squeeze, if it is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please BinNMU libnss-lwres on all arches, as the package depends on
liblwres50 which was replaced by liblwres60.
Copying from a similar bug report, the following might work:
nmu lablgtkmathview_0.7.8-5 . ALL . -m Recompile with gmetadom 0.2.6-5
[Please keep me Cc:ed, as I'm not subscribed to debian-release; note
that the FusionForge list is moderated for non-members]
Philipp Kern, 2010-03-14 21:42:58 +0100 :
Dear fellow developers,
we all want to get out squeeze as soon as possible. Currently we are
still at 400 bugs concerning
Heya,
[CC/M-F-T -release@ set, don't see why this needs to be on -devel]
Clint Adams sch...@debian.org writes:
I do not really know what you are talking about, but I do not
want the kids on the playground calling me a coward, so you
clearly have given me no choice but to accept your offer.
On 2010-03-16, Marc Brockschmidt m...@marcbrockschmidt.de wrote:
* python2.6:
- Phase 1: add support for 2.6 for multi-python-supporting packages
- Phase 2:
+ build packages for default version 2.6
+ Known open issues:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:28:58PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
We had a short, rather spontaneous (arranged this afternoon) meeting in
#debian-release. Here are the notes, feel free to comment if anything
seems weird, plain wrong or otherwise makes you wish to say something:
On 11.03.2010 13:22, Colin Watson wrote:
drives, which are becoming increasingly common. There is an ABI
transition involved, among the following source packages (maintainers
devicekit-disks
As soon as gnome-disk-utility enters testing (hopefully in 10 days), I'll
request the removal of
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 22:28 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
* liblo:
- Hanging on sivp, bugs needs to be filed, might be solved by
removing
Ehm, how does sivp affect liblo? I cannot find a chain from liblo to
sivp...
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 22:28 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
* liblo:
- Hanging on sivp, bugs needs to be filed, might be solved by
removing
Ehm, how does sivp affect liblo? I cannot find a chain from liblo to
sivp...
freej is depending on both
On 16/03/10 at 22:18 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:28:58PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
* ruby1.9 - ruby1.9.1:
- already ongoing (20 packages, half done)
- needs to fix ruby1.9.1/sparc FTBFS (new kernel?)
- HE is tracking it
Marc, I think we've put
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:21 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:51:57PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
- nouveau is nowhere near ready, and needs someone to take care of
getting the userspace components (and firmware) in sid soon
I know it's non-free, but I guess we
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:37:25PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
OK, I'm not sure how much of that is an actual offer, but I would be
happy to accept any help you can give. Do you have any ideas how you
could help the release team, or, in a more general way, the release?
How would you
Processing changes file: dhcp3_3.0.4-13+etch2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dhcp3_3.0.4-13+etch2_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dhcp3_3.0.4-13+etch2_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dhcp3_3.0.4-13+etch2_hppa.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
19 matches
Mail list logo
