* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2010-07-22, 11:38:
It was discovered that VIGRA 1.7.0 (known as libvigraimpex in
Debian), broke ABI without bumping SONAME. Unforuntaly, the flawed
version has already migrated to testing. As a consequence, lprof, the
only rev-dependency of VIGRA, is currently
Hi,
I'd like to upload a new git-core package to proposed-updates in order to fix
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590026.
This is a security issue but we don't plan to issue a DSA for this. Since
Gerrit Pape is currently not available from what I know I prepared an NMU for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove gallery2 from testing. There's been no followup to
security bug #564561 for more than seven months.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, July 23, 2010 00:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:58:10 -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
Hi, to address bug #577141 in lenny, would you consider an out of bounds
update of the libapache2-mod-gnutls package to
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:24:27 +0100
with message-id
1280258668.25579.822.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#590602: RM: gallery2/2.3.1.dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590602,
regarding RM: gallery2/2.3.1.dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:47 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2010-07-22, 11:38:
It was discovered that VIGRA 1.7.0 (known as libvigraimpex in
Debian), broke ABI without bumping SONAME.
[...]
3. Leave SONAME as is, but rename binary package from
libvigraimpex2ldbl back
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 18:22 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
I'd like to upload a new git-core package to proposed-updates in order to fix
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590026.
This is a security issue but we don't plan to issue a DSA for this. Since
Gerrit Pape is
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 08:29:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:13 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Switching to libpng 1.4.x for squeeze would require a transition.
You missed the words rather large out of the above sentence.
Assuming that I can count, there are
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 12:04 -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...] reading the bug report and looking at the
upstream tracker indicates that the fix required for the bug is three
lines long -
On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
save you from having a sourceful upload and rebuilds on all
architectures. Probably the hppa buildd admins (in Cc) can help here?
One issue is that any further updates to the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 588464 + pending
Bug #588464 [release.debian.org] pu: package
libnet-sftp-foreign-perl/1.42+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
588464:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
save you from having a sourceful upload and rebuilds on all
architectures. Probably the hppa buildd admins
Nico,
am Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:22:44PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
I'd like to upload a new git-core package to proposed-updates in order to fix
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590026.
so why exactly do you upload before confirmation?
+git-core
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
save you from having a sourceful upload
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:23:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:15:23PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:23:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On freed 16 July 2010,
Processing changes file: gnupg2_2.0.9-3.1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg2_2.0.9-3.1+lenny1_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg2_2.0.9-3.1+lenny1_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg2_2.0.9-3.1+lenny1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
* We decided to refer to the Release Team the question as to
whether the package is releaseable in its current state.
So, we would appreciate it if you would take a look at this situation
and decide. When you've decided you should probably set the
18 matches
Mail list logo
