On Tuesday 07 December 2010, Simon Josefsson wrote:
But Suse has released updates for 2.4.1 and 2.8.6 [2]. I have put
the extracted source rpms at [3]. The patches are huge but 80%
seem to be the test suite. [3] contains two versions of each,
the older one is the released package and the
Hi!
Am 07.12.2010 18:01, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
Uploading ia32-libs-core_20101207_source to mentors. Sponsors
welcome.
That one FTBFS for me with:
dh_builddeb -s
dh_builddeb: You asked that all arch in(dep) packages be built, but
there are none of that type.
dpkg-genchanges
Hi!
Am 08.12.2010 09:31, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
That one FTBFS for me with:
Sorry for the noise. I was just pointed at the fact, that this is the
expected behaviour when building an ia64 package on amd64 :(
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:45:30AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
#603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user
security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking.
Could you explain why it should be acceptable to announce secure
operation but ignore
Il 05/12/2010 22:01, Mehdi Dogguy ha scritto:
Could you please fix this? I see two solutions
1) Upload the fix for the RC-bug to testing-proposed-updates
2) Revert the source format change in unstable and remove
/usr/share/phamm/.pc. Thus, making it possible to migrate phamm from
Unstable to
Hi!
Am 08.12.2010 10:37, schrieb Bastian Blank:
#564690 is an old example of the same problem.
So is #547092 (which has severity important). And I'm sure if we dig
deep enough, we can find others as well.
There's patch floating arround, which has a major regression: It doesn't
work for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package opendnssec
Same reasons as for opendnssec/1.1.3-2 (#605601), but this time I have
removed rebuilding *.rng files because there is an error in trang
package which
* Bastian Blank [2010-12-08 10:37 +0100]:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:45:30AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
#603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user
security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking.
Could you explain why it should be
tag 511582 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 22:23:04 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
IMO we should ignore this for Squeeze and proceed with removing opie after
the Squeeze release.
Sounds like a good plan.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi.
Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 19:57 +0800, Thomas Goirand (GPLHost) a
écrit :
On 09/08/2010 12:02 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
That leads me to say that I would suggest any DD
to *not* sponsor any package from Olivier Berger in the future, as he
really had a bad attitude on this
Oh, and btw, please use a proper 'from' or reply-to address if you post
and eventually expect a response...
Here's the message I've sent to you earlier, but which bounced on
Thomas Goirand (GPLHost) tho...@goirand.nospam.fr :-/
Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 13:50 +0100, Olivier Berger a écrit :
Dear Christian,
Debian uses a different directory structure then upstream since years.
The CVE-2010-3764 patch can not be applied as drop in because it's
affect the directory structure of Debian. You have to change Debian's
patches to achieve this too.
Instead of loosing time changing something
On the basis of final comments about #603986 a rebuild could fix
the problem.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:35 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On the basis of final comments about #603986 a rebuild could fix
the problem.
I was about to suggest that you should have e-mailed powe...@buildd.d.o
and/or debian-wb-t...@l.d.o for this, but looking at the bug and the
package
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:35:06PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:25 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package distcc. It fixes another of the yet CVE-less
PYTHONPATH issues.
Looking at the diff, either the original code is more broken than the
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:17:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 18:23:39 +, Colin Watson wrote:
grub2 (1.98+20100804-10) unstable; urgency=low
I've just unblocked this one, should go in in a couple of days, barring
new RC bugs.
So are those
Hi,
On Wed Dec 08, 2010 at 19:21:50 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
reassign 606327 open-vm-tools
severity 606327 important
thanks
On 12/08/2010 01:54 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
This makes the package partly unsuable
right, partially, correcting severity.
Please provide vmmemctl on
Ignoring files that have only changed SVN ID, removed files which
were already ignored by debian/rules (mt-static/support/dashboard/stats)
and changes which only bump the version number, we have the following
changes between MTOS 4.34 and 4.35:
lib/MT/App/Search.pm| 22
Quoting Raphael Bossek (boss...@debian.org):
Dear Christian,
Debian uses a different directory structure then upstream since years.
The CVE-2010-3764 patch can not be applied as drop in because it's
affect the directory structure of Debian. You have to change Debian's
patches to achieve
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1
and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable
version.
RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:31 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I've made a new upload of schroot to unstable which fixes a few
security- and upgrade-related bugs. The bulk of the changes are
documentation (manual pages, release notes and changelogs). The
code changes are tiny, but are important to
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:19:02PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:17:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 18:23:39 +, Colin Watson wrote:
grub2 (1.98+20100804-10) unstable; urgency=low
I've just unblocked this one, should go in in a
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1
and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable
version.
RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libio-socket-ssl-perl. It fixes CVE-2010-4334.
If the diff between 1.33 and 1.35 is to large to unblock, we'll need
a tpu upload with the security fix only, adding
severity 606327 grave
thanks
On 08/12/2010 20:24, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Wed Dec 08, 2010 at 19:21:50 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
reassign 606327 open-vm-tools severity 606327 important thanks
On 12/08/2010 01:54 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
This makes the package partly
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote:
Il giorno ven, 12/11/2010 alle 13.46 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff ha
scritto:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:08:38AM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote:
I didn't forget this, it's just harder than I thought, in particular
considering
On 08/12/2010 21:57, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
[ Adding debian-release to CC, please remove libcloud from testing for now ]
Removal hint added.
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:52:13PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libio-socket-ssl-perl. It fixes CVE-2010-4334.
If the diff between 1.33 and 1.35 is
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 13:38 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I just uploaded libio-socket-ssl-perl 1.35-1 to unstable fixing Bug
#606058 (http://bugs.debian.org/606058) (Severity normal, tagged
security). The change done by upstream is, that if the verify_mode is
not VERIFY_NONE and the
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:52 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package libio-socket-ssl-perl. It fixes CVE-2010-4334.
If the diff between 1.33 and 1.35 is to large to unblock, we'll need
a tpu upload with the security fix only, adding Salvatore to CC.
Salvatore already suggested
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:03:17PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1
and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable
version.
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Moreover, it doesn't seem to fix any RC bug.
unscd was made to resolve the problems seen in nscd where nscd is
near useless in a system with any amount of load (see #574990 et
al.)
So, I'd rather keep it
Hi.
I'm the maintainer. I'll readily admit I've failed miserably to
track this issue appropriately.
Part of it is due to some rather unfortunate e-mail filtering, but
that's certainly not all. (Debian bug mail ended in a folder I didn't
subscribe to, but I noticed the issue when it was first
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 06:53:44PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:35 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On the basis of final comments about #603986 a rebuild could fix
the problem.
I was about to suggest that you should have e-mailed powe...@buildd.d.o
and/or
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I only just uploaded this, but before I forget, this fixes a critical
bug and I think it should go into squeeze.
grub (0.97-64) unstable; urgency=low
* Exit silently from zz-update-grub
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:44:48PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:31 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I've made a new upload of schroot to unstable which fixes a few
security- and upgrade-related bugs. The bulk of the changes are
documentation (manual pages, release notes
Your message dated Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:12:29 +
with message-id 1291846349.3331.10.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606399: unblock: grub 0.97-64
has caused the Debian Bug report #606399,
regarding unblock: grub 0.97-64
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:17:48PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
Chocolate doom (contrib) upstream has alerted me to an RC bug
http://bugs.debian.org/605504. The problem is actually in
libsdl-mixer1.2 and is fixed upstream. There are three possible
ways to resolve this for squeeze (asides from
On 12/08/2010 10:14 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Could you please provide a reasonable fix for
this bug?
the correct fix is to upload open-vm-tools 8.4.2-261024. will you accept
this new-old upstream release for squeeze?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove lgrind from Squeeze. It's more or less unmaintained (the
maintainer didn't notice the lack of autobuild/testing migration since
april and didn't followup on my pointer (which
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package movabletype-opensource
This fixes security vulnerabilities, see #606311.
unblock movabletype-opensource/4.3.5+dfsg-1
Many thanks,
Dominic.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 at 05:05:54 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
I guess the inetd se_v4mapped logical inversion fix and the “ping -w”
support, both from upstream 1.8, would be important to have.
My backport of making tcp/udp be v4-only already included the inversion fix
as part of the conflict
Your message dated Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:52:50 +
with message-id 1291852370.3331.318.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606406: unblock: movabletype-opensource/4.3.5+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #606406,
regarding unblock: movabletype-opensource/4.3.5+dfsg-1
Hi Simon,
Simon McVittie wrote:
[ping on kfreebsd]
(I also don't have a kFreeBSD machine around to test that aspect of it.)
If you want, you can prepare a test-case on io.d.n or asdfasdf.d.n,
and me (or KiBi or aurel32) can test the stuff which needs root
permissions or setuid.
Another option
Your message dated Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:56:58 +
with message-id 1291852618.3331.332.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606404: RM: lgrind/3.67-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #606404,
regarding RM: lgrind/3.67-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-reference
Basic document corrections and translation updates:
debian-reference (2.45) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed typo per Mathieu Parent. Closes:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-history
Document corrections and translation updates.
debian-history (2.14) unstable; urgency=low
[ David Prévot ]
* Updated French translation from
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:32:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:35:06PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Looking at the diff, either the original code is more broken than the
general case, or it's intentionally adding an empty entry to PYTHONPATH.
It seems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hello!
There have been a number of issues that have come up in the puppet
package that really should be included in Squeeze. The puppet
packaging team have fixed them, and so I am
Um, well I could see if they would accept a patch I could make up soon...
The problem is / was they closed the bug saying it was a python issue,
where they didnt' even attempt to ensure that a https connection would
be secured, through wrapping it in ssl, iirc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 11:04 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Please unblock package debian-reference
Basic document corrections and translation updates:
debian-reference (2.45) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed typo per Mathieu Parent. Closes: #597816
* Added clearsigned gpg mail example.
*
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:03:17PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog
4.10.1-1+squeeze1 and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen
NMUd the unstable version.
Good morning,
we (Sysadmins at ETH Zurich) would be very happy to see unscd unblocked.
nscd is broken for YEARS and nobody cared (*) about it. Don is
probably the only person in the Debian area, who took
responsibilty and created a VERY GOOD replacement (**).
IF you haven't run a large scale
Your message dated Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:27:47 +0100
with message-id 4d0084f3.6000...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606430: unblock: puppet/2.6.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #606430,
regarding unblock: puppet/2.6.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
54 matches
Mail list logo
