Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package console-setup
1.61 is currently in testing. There is no 1.62.
1.63 brought several additionnal debconf translations (needed for D-I)
1.64 fixes an important bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package console-data
This upload brings in the final l10n update that was pending in the
package VCS. It should be the last before squeeze. Given that such
strings are used
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package eject
This NMU brings in several debconf translations that were pending in
the git repository (mostly committed by me with agreement by Frank
Lichtenheld). I finally
On 18/12/10 at 21:38 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
It's because of this part:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:48:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Preparing to replace snmpd 5.4.1~dfsg-12 (using
.../snmpd_5.4.3~dfsg-1_amd64.deb) ...
invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of stop.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
I would like to upload, shortly after testing migration, a new release
of iceweasel and iceape with the following changes:
- Remove the upgrade notification. It has too many caveats to be
useful to our users at the moment. I
Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:27:20 +
with message-id 1292758040.31121.5683.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#607506: unblock: eject/2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607506,
regarding unblock: eject/2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-7.1
to
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:47:06 -0800, Devin Carraway wrote:
I'll try to take a look at this this weekend.
Thanks!
Not severity=grave for qpsmtpd, but will let it stay on the presumption that
it's blocking another grave bug.
Right, I set #607472 to grave under the assumption that we want to
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Thomas Schmidt wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 12.12.2010, 14:18 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
For me, it's a grave regression that can put a production environment
into big troubles, and it would deserved a RC for me, but because:
- of Julien's opinion
-
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock latex209-bin/25.mar.1992-12.3, it fixes installation
failure (#606786).
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 07:26:37PM +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi,
gtk+ 2.91.6 breaks the ABI. It's in experimental and it's an
unstable release without any API/ABI guarantees yet, so it's fine.
We just need some binNMUs, and the resulting packages will depend on
gtk+ = 2.91.6.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
grub2 (1.98+20100804-11) unstable; urgency=low
* Exit silently from zz-update-grub kernel hook if update-grub does not
exist (e.g. if grub-pc has been removed but not purged; closes:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please remove minitube from testing pending a new upstream. The maintainer
approves and will seek to get it into volatile instead, because of the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
parted (2.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove DASD restriction on _disk_sync_part_table, as otherwise DASD
partitioning will never work properly (closes: #605759).
-- Colin Watson
Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:56:43 +
with message-id 1292767003.31121.6430.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#607524: unblock: grub2/1.98+20100804-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #607524,
regarding unblock: grub2/1.98+20100804-11
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:00:17 +
with message-id 1292767217.31121.6451.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#607521: unblock: latex209-bin/25.mar.1992-12.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #607521,
regarding unblock: latex209-bin/25.mar.1992-12.3
to be
On 2010-12-18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 00:28 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
* Fixed CSRF vulnerability in e-mail me my password,
create account and create by e-mail features of
[[Special:Userlogin]]. CVE-2010-1648
* Fixed XSS
Processing changes file: gquilt_0.20-2+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mediawiki_1.12.0-2lenny6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 13:51:47 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 23:29, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
Most of his answer seemed to be about why we should accept the newer
version of cl-asdf rather than the source format change; lintian didn't
Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:47:46 +
with message-id 1292770066.31121.6720.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #606067,
regarding unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 14:46 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-12-18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
The security tracker seems to be somewhat confused here, fwiw -
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-164{7,8} both claim
that the issue was fixed in
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 00:42:13 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello release team,
PostgreSQL announced new microreleases on Thursday:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release-9-0-2.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/release-8-4-6.html
Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:06:51 +
with message-id 1292771211.31121.6834.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#607473: release.debian.org: please unblock
cyrus-sasl2/2.1.23.dfsg1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #607473,
regarding release.debian.org:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package console-tools. This changes Recommends to avoid
installing console-data by default. If d-i uses console-setup-udeb
(which the graphical installer does) then
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 13:19 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Please remove minitube from testing pending a new upstream. The maintainer
approves and will seek to get it into volatile instead, because of the
unstable API - see #606670.
Apologies for not spotting the issue earlier, but those
Hello Julien,
Julien Cristau [2010-12-19 16:03 +0100]:
I also prepared an 8.3.13 update for lenny in [3], ok for me to
upload?
Yes, that should be fine.
Uploaded.
With Squeeze now being in deep freeze, how do you want the 8.4 update
to be handled there? Do you want to get it into
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 16:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Please unblock package console-tools. This changes Recommends to avoid
installing console-data by default. If d-i uses console-setup-udeb
(which the graphical installer does) then installing console-data will
ask unnecessary questions
Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:11:33 +
with message-id 1292775093.31121.7207.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#607531: unblock: console-tools/1:0.2.3dbs-69.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607531,
regarding unblock: console-tools/1:0.2.3dbs-69.1
to be
On 2010-12-19, Adam D. Barratt a...@funky-badger.org wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 14:46 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On 2010-12-18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
The security tracker seems to be somewhat confused here, fwiw -
Hello,
Please consider allowing libqglviewer 2.3.4-4 in testing. The lastest
version is the same upstream source as currently available in testing
(2.3.4), but compiled with current toolchain and two description typos
corrected: #584182[1] and #605885[2]. Changelog entries for 2.3.4-3
and 2.3.4-4
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package titantools
It fixes RC bug #584383 (and moved the package to non-free).
unblock titantools/4.0.11+notdfsg1-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package kdeaccessibility
This revision fixes a crash which occurs when new kttsd tries to load an
invalid config file which used to be valid in previous versions
reopen 599534
thanks
see #606680
On 18.12.2010 15:03, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 17:28:30 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-distutils-extras
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 599534
Bug #599534 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
unblock: python-distutils-extra 2.22-2
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
599534:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:16:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
reopen 599534
thanks
see #606680
What am I supposed to see there?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
There have been several issues reported for the mgltools
which are now beeing addressed too late to be considered
for squeeze and I personally have experienced now core
dumps after removing and
On 19.12.2010 20:30, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:16:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
reopen 599534
thanks
see #606680
What am I supposed to see there?
the separate issue mentioned in your citation, which is processed by the release
team, and packages migrated to
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:42:15 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 19.12.2010 20:30, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:16:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
reopen 599534
thanks
see #606680
What am I supposed to see there?
the separate issue mentioned in your citation,
retitle 607132 unblock: python-defaults/2.6.6-3+squeeze4
thanks
RC bug (#607555) backported from 2.6.6-9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 607132 unblock: python-defaults/2.6.6-3+squeeze4
Bug #607132 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-defaults/2.6.6-3+squeeze3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: python-defaults/2.6.6-3+squeeze4' from 'unblock:
python-defaults/2.6.6-3+squeeze3'
Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:25:31 +
with message-id 1292793931.31121.9099.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#607564: (no subject)
has caused the Debian Bug report #607564,
regarding (no subject)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:44:38PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:49:32 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi, Release team.
I want to upload the bluez package which revised the following in squeeze.
Could you take permission of the upload?
bluez
tag 585392 + moreinfo
thanks
Questions:
* Does this bug hold back mysql-5.1 or squeeze? It doesn't seem to
have, but some tools seem to report this bug as being in squeeze.
* Is this reproducible anywhere? I haven't found any evidence that it is.
* Does this bug not affect mysql 5.1? If
42 matches
Mail list logo
