Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@debian.org):
Do you intend to fix that in unstable? Did you submit a bug so that it's
kept under someone's radar?
In any case, like what jcristau said… so closing this bugreport.
Rah, apologies for not doing so... I just reported #610840 and
committed the fix in
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:51:43 +
with message-id 1295787103.7934.3169.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610701: unblock: request-tracker3.8/3.8.8-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #610701,
regarding unblock: request-tracker3.8/3.8.8-7
to be marked as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hello,
I have uploaded exim4/4.72-4 to sid yesterday. There are two changes
compared to squeeze:
* A fix for a local security issue. (CVE-2011-0017: the Exim run-time user
can
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:10:14 +0100
with message-id 20110123171014.gz30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610879: unblock: exim4/4.72-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #610879,
regarding unblock: exim4/4.72-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@debian.org):
On 19/01/2011 01:00, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:36:19PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
Or grab the PO file from the BTS web interface
Yeah - files grabbed, I need to build the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lvm2. It cleans up a etch-lenny upgrade that now
conflicts somehow with sysv-rc. The problem breaks upgrades from
machines that had lvm2 or other devicer-mapper tools
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:58:26 +0100
with message-id 4d3c6c42.2080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610224: unblock: calendarserver/2.4.dfsg-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610224,
regarding unblock: calendarserver/2.4.dfsg-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:12:13 +
with message-id 1295806333.7934.4550.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610052: unblock: util-linux/2.17.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #610052,
regarding unblock: util-linux/2.17.2-6
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:11:03 +
with message-id 1295806263.7934.4543.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610884: unblock: lvm2/2.02.66-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #610884,
regarding unblock: lvm2/2.02.66-5
to be marked as done.
This means that
Ping.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Jeff Breidenbach j...@jab.org wrote:
diffstat: 61 files changed, 1502 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-)
Is all of that necessary to fix the security issues?
No.
However, I do not have the ability to isolate (and especially validate)
just the security
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to get a fix uploaded for #610714 for auctex in squeeze.
This should be straightforward. The fix breaks preview with the
version of ghostscript in squeeze (8.71~dfsg2-6.1), and was
Hello,
I reported a d-i a bug about a week ago:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609722
I redid the installation today altough it was closed in the meantime, it is
still there.
Can somebody check if my comment stating that reopened the bug, or if it
gets ignored?
Thanks,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 19:47:22 +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hello,
I reported a d-i a bug about a week ago:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609722
I redid the installation today altough it was closed in the meantime, it is
still there.
Can somebody check if
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:49:01 +0100
with message-id 4d3c943d.80...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#608350: unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #608350,
regarding unblock: gnash/0.8.8-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
severity 610714 serious
thanks
Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote:
I'd like to get a fix uploaded for #610714 for auctex in squeeze.
This should be straightforward. The fix breaks preview
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 610714 + squeeze-can-defer
tag 610714 + squeeze-ignore
thanks
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 22:23 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
severity 610714 serious
thanks
Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
[...]
I think that getting the fix into a point
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:36:37 -0600
with message-id 20110124033637.GA10448@burratino
and subject line Re: Accepted git-core 1:1.5.6.5-3+lenny3.3 (source all amd64)
has caused the Debian Bug report #609947,
regarding pu: package git-core/1:1.5.6.5-3+lenny3.3
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:45:18 -0600
with message-id 20110124034518.GA10480@burratino
and subject line Re: Accepted mumble 1.1.4-4+lenny2 (source all i386)
has caused the Debian Bug report #610146,
regarding pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi Frank,
Thanks for your kind message.
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Frank Küster wrote:
severity 610714 serious
thanks
Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote:
I'd like to get a fix uploaded for
19 matches
Mail list logo
