Hello dear release team,
The Samba Team was planning to ship Samba 3.6.6 (their stable
release with many bugfixesbut *only* bugfixes) as of May 25th.
However, a late notice of a possible security issue was discovered
during that week and the Samba release manager delayed the release
until
I discussed this briefly with Adam Conrad whom knows a fair bit more
about GCC than I do.
He assured me that 4.4's i386 code would be mostly identical to 4.7's,
so there shouldn't be risk of performance regression.
So, if 4.4 is indeed staying, then it sounds like a good option to just
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
Hi,
I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working
on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate
use of the Urgency field:
* Urgency high to beat the freeze.
As mentioned in the last mail we
Dear Release Team,
Claws Mail upstream has also set a release date for the next version [0],
which will be on 27 June.
If possible, I'd like this version to be in wheezy too. In case some new
plugin is made available on the extra-plugins it will be not added, in order
to avoid NEW queue
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:00:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Though looking at why this was done it's not clear to me why we're not
doing this particular round of uploads for all arches...
Because with the current buildd architecture you cannot get equal changelogs
across all architectures, even
Dear Release Team,
Sylpheed upstream has published a release plan for next Sylpheed stable
version, 3.2 [0] and the release it's planned for next 29 June.
If possible, I would like to have this version instead of current beta or
the next rc, as it's the version which gets the security
Hi,
I'd like the following to be permitted to be uploaded for wheezy:
schroot 1.6.0
This is just 1.5.4 in unstable with translation updates and
a few minor bugfixes. This is the stable release intended for
the wheezy release.
gutenprint 5.2.8
This is a point release with a large number
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:35:41AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
It looks like my recent libassa upload fell afoul of this, but it does
in fact fix a release critical bug in libassa 3.5.1-1. The -dev
package is missing a dependency that makes building against the
library impossible. The changelog
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:00:21AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Though looking at why this was done it's not clear to me why we're not
doing this particular round of uploads for all arches...
I didn't get what you pointed at, but it was me who scheduled it. You
built the package with an old version
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:09:02AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Dear release team,
warzone2100 3.1 beta 11 was released today and I would like it and
future 3.1 versions to enter wheezy. 3.1 is the culmination of a year's
work and brings some important improvements (like deterministic network
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:32:20AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'm planning to upload dpkg 1.16.5 to unstable on the 26th, to be able
to finish cleaning up some pending changes I've locally and to give
some time for the initial wave of translation updates once I've sent
the call. Given that
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:00:50AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Still, Karolin Seeger, the Samba release manager, announce recently in
the samba-technical mailign list tjhat the 3.6.6 release is due out
for July 2nd.
Hi,
This would be too late for the freeze, which will be happening in
On 2012-06-19 20:35:48, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:04 +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
On 2012-06-19 12:26:39, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:20:30 +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
I'd like to upload (not personally but by my sponsor [thx Matthijs
btw])
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Dear Release Team,
Sylpheed upstream has published a release plan for next Sylpheed stable
version, 3.2 [0] and the release it's planned for next 29 June.
If possible, I would like to have this version instead of current
Hi,
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier.
On 05/19/2012 04:33 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Either way, the current state is broken, because -base is linked
with libobjc3 while -gui is mixed because it failed to built at that
time, so many GNUstep packages are unusable because they end up
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:04:29AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Claws Mail upstream has also set a release date for the next version [0],
which will be on 27 June.
Hi,
That would be cutting it very fine. If you are happy to maintain the
snapshot for the length of a stable release, I would
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi release managers,
mozplugger is RC-buggy and plus it is no longer actively maintained upstream.
So given its current status, I'd ask you to remove it from testing as it is not
suitable for
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
Please provide a description of whatever problem you think you are
seeing and contact the release team (who are responsible for binnmus).
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Dear Release Team,
Sylpheed upstream has published a release plan for next Sylpheed stable
version, 3.2 [0] and the release it's planned for next 29
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:05:43AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:04:29AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Claws Mail upstream has also set a release date for the next version [0],
which will be on 27 June.
Hi,
That would be cutting it very fine. If you
On 20.06.2012 09:47, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
On 2012-06-19 20:35:48, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:04 +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
On 2012-06-19 12:26:39, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:20:30 +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
I'd like to upload (not personally
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 678246
Bug #678246 [release.debian.org] RM: mozplugger/1.14.5-1
Marked Bug as done
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
678246: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678246
Debian Bug
Hi,
Alle giovedì 14 giugno 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
They are leaf packages so they can be always hinted out of testing
until they get fixes.
- kshutdown has not been handled yet, we will do so soon
This has been fixed yesterday.
- plasma-widget-smooth-tasks is getting an update
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
The libiml0 package is in an unusable state in sid:
$ ldd /usr/lib/libiml.so
[...]
libcblas.so.3gf = not found
libatlas.so.3gf = not found
The reason is a SONAME
Jamie,
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after that
I'll upload with a 2-day delay.
diff -Nru pmacct-0.14.0/debian/changelog
On 20/06/12 11:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Jamie,
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after that
I'll upload with a 2-day delay.
On 20/06/12 11:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after that
I'll upload with a 2-day delay.
Thanks for
On 20/06/12 12:27, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 20/06/12 11:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Do you have an idea on which fixes are needed to be backported if we
don't have time to do a transition?
Yes.
Did you test them?
No, but I'm going to do it now. The changes are minimal but are in a
hairy area and that makes me feel uneasy. This combination has never
Hi Nicholas,
On 20/06/12 12:53, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Sorry I didn't notice the FTBS on hurd as I was concentrating on the
red. I guess I should have trusted the bug report title more.
I only noticed on buildd.d.o that the failure was the same there.
However I am confused at what your are
Hi,
On 20.06.2012 11:22, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle giovedì 14 giugno 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
Yep. Scheduled, minus apper/sparc which appears to have built more
recently than the other arches and already picked up the correct
dependency.
Thanks, it seems everywhere binNMUs went
On 17.05.2012 07:33, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (17/05/2012):
On 12-05-16 at 11:55pm, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
What modifications? Alternatively: where can I find the new
package?
They need to change from current build-depending on
libc-client2007e-dev
to
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:14:18AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
libreoffice (Rene is already working on that)
uploaded.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Jamie,
Based upon the feedback I have received (including #debian-hurd) I am
attaching a new debdiff. Unless I get any more feedback I'll probably
upload it tomorrow with a 2-day delay.
diff -Nru pmacct-0.14.0/debian/changelog pmacct-0.14.0/debian/changelog
---
Hi,
as already explained by Jordi, there’s one big remaining bit: GDM.
Currently it is stuck at version 3.0 (mostly because I didn’t have
enough time to work on it), and version 3.4 should be hopefully ready
for sid within a week or two.
Upstream changes include:
* dropping GConf (yay)
[Forget the previous email, my fingers slipped.]
Hi,
as already explained by Jordi, there’s one big remaining bit for GNOME
in wheezy: GDM. Currently it is stuck at version 3.0 (mostly because I
didn’t have enough time to work on it), and version 3.4 should be
hopefully ready for sid within a
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:18:07PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
as already explained by Jordi, there’s one big remaining bit for GNOME
in wheezy: GDM. Currently it is stuck at version 3.0 (mostly because I
didn’t have enough time to work on it), and version 3.4 should be
hopefully ready for
Hey,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:18:07PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Why we should do it (in reverse order of importance):
1. No more GConf, better startup scripts.
2. Longer upstream support for 3.4.
3. Optional gnome-shell support.
4. Multi-seat support (if we get
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:41:22AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello Andrew.
Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.org (19/06/2012):
I'm wondering if there's still time to update it (properly) before wheezy
freezes? It looks like it would involve a small library transition.
Assuming I get
Hi,
Alle mercoledì 20 giugno 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
On 20.06.2012 11:22, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle giovedì 14 giugno 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
Yep. Scheduled, minus apper/sparc which appears to have built
more recently than the other arches and already picked up the
On 12-06-20 at 01:55pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 17.05.2012 07:33, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (17/05/2012):
On 12-05-16 at 11:55pm, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
What modifications? Alternatively: where can I find the new
package?
They need to change from current
gcc-defaults in testing depends on gccgo-4.6 which is no longer built by
the gcc-4.6 source package in unstable. The new gcc-defaults in unstable
is blocked from migrating due to the standoff between the release team
and the gcc maintainers over gcc-4.7. As a result of this gcc-4.6 cannot
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:08:43 -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I completely understand. I just thought I'd ask the question. So would
introducing this into unstable have to wait until after the freeze, or after
the release of wheezy?
It would have to be after the release. It could sit in
Quoting Neil McGovern (ne...@debian.org):
This would be too late for the freeze, which will be happening in June.
*that*, I know..:-)
So, I would like to pre-ask for a freeze exception for samba in case
wheezy is frozen before July 2nd. Of course, it would be better to do
that with a
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:30:44 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
The libiml0 package is in an unusable state in sid:
$ ldd /usr/lib/libiml.so
[...]
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 21:31:04 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Neil McGovern (ne...@debian.org):
This would be too late for the freeze, which will be happening in June.
*that*, I know..:-)
So, I would like to pre-ask for a freeze exception for samba in case
wheezy is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 678253 + moreinfo
Bug #678253 [release.debian.org] nmu: iml_1.0.3-4.2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
678253: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678253
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:10:08 +0200
with message-id 87vcilwxr3@brouzouf.villemot.name
and subject line Re: Bug#678253: nmu: iml_1.0.3-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678253,
regarding nmu: iml_1.0.3-4.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On 20/06/12 15:59, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Based upon the feedback I have received (including #debian-hurd) I am
attaching a new debdiff.
This debdiff doesn't address the main point of my original mail:
sockaddr_dl and net/if_dl.h are not (k)FreeBSD-specific, so a test for
FreeBSD ||
On 20/06/12 22:04, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 20/06/12 15:59, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Based upon the feedback I have received (including #debian-hurd) I am
attaching a new debdiff.
This debdiff doesn't address the main point of my original mail:
sockaddr_dl and net/if_dl.h are not
Hi,
I admit I do not really understand the meaning of the URL above saying:
trying to update jquery-goodies from 5-1 to 6-1 (candidate is 14 days old)
Updating jquery-goodies makes 1 depending packages uninstallable on i386:
gnumed-doc
Could you please give some advise what to do to not
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 23:10 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
I admit I do not really understand the meaning of the URL above saying:
You mean below...
trying to update jquery-goodies from 5-1 to 6-1 (candidate is 14 days old)
Updating jquery-goodies makes 1 depending packages uninstallable on
Last I checked, a freeze meant that anything already uploaded to
unstable at the time when the 'freeze' button is pressed automatically
transitions to Testing as normal. Has this changed? If so, why? And if
so, can you move freeze to Jul 01... it appears there's way too many
people worried their
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 23:32 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Last I checked, a freeze meant that anything already uploaded to
unstable at the time when the 'freeze' button is pressed automatically
transitions to Testing as normal.
A freeze means packages stop migrating without manual action
On 20/06/12 22:09, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
On 20/06/12 22:04, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
This debdiff doesn't address the main point of my original mail:
sockaddr_dl and net/if_dl.h are not (k)FreeBSD-specific, so a test for
FreeBSD || FreeBSD_kernel would not be appropriate.
You still didn't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 677574
Bug #677574 {Done: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org} [release.debian.org]
transition: libv8
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677574 to the same values
previously set
--
Stopping processing here.
Please
On 20/06/12 22:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
[...] it appears there's way too many
people worried their shiniest new thing won't enter Wheezy
A lot of that going on recently :)
Perhaps rushing things into testing quicker than one should, or
pressuring upstream to hurry their release
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes:
Perhaps rushing things into testing quicker than one should, or
pressuring upstream to hurry their release schedule. At least when this
happens in commercial software it seems usually a bad thing.
I think now I understand OpenBSD's rationale for
On Monday 19 March 2012 22:07:22 Sune Vuorela wrote:
We have a strong suspicion, among other things due to a almost frozen
kdelibs upstream and due to the various source package splits that has
happened as part of the 4.7 transition, that the 4.8 transition will be
a handful of untangled
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 19:48 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle mercoledì 20 giugno 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
On 20.06.2012 11:22, Pino Toscano wrote:
Alle giovedì 14 giugno 2012, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
Given that kde-workspace is 9/10, would it be possible to let it
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 23:32 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Last I checked, a freeze meant that anything already uploaded to
unstable at the time when the 'freeze' button is pressed automatically
transitions
Le mercredi 20 juin 2012 à 16:42 +0100, Neil McGovern a écrit :
A week or two can be potentially problematic. If it's within a week then
it's probable to land before the freeze, but if not then it'll not be
something that can be accepted with such a large delta.
The situation was not as much
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (11/06/2012):
It's likely that a mass upload is needed for l10n purposes. Also, I
think that a beta is the moment where I should decide about which
languages I drop
(http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2012/06/09#di-deactivation-status-8)
I think you're done
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:37:55AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (11/06/2012):
It's likely that a mass upload is needed for l10n purposes. Also, I
think that a beta is the moment where I should decide about which
languages I drop
64 matches
Mail list logo
