2012/8/6 David Prévot taf...@debian.org:
Ouch, wouldn't that break the validity of the XML files? Maybe using the
--nonet option of xsltproc would be proper.
I just tried using --nonet, using different positions, but I always get
failed to load external entity
Daca nu vizualizati corect acest mail faceti click aici:
http://www.pretulverde.ro/SUPER3deals.html
Va puteti dezabona aici:
http://www.pretulverde.ro/letter/?p=unsubscribeuid=08cff0ef5aa5cb2cac2c90373ea3f64e
Sau puteti trimite oferta noastra unui prieten:
* Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org, 2012-08-06, 08:40:
Ouch, wouldn't that break the validity of the XML files?
ACK, changing document declarations sounds like a bad idea.
Maybe using the --nonet option of xsltproc would be proper.
I just tried using --nonet, using different positions,
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:22:57 +0200
with message-id 20120806082257.ga23...@spike.0x539.de
and subject line Re: Bug#682405: unblock: xserver-xorg-input-mouse/1:1.7.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #682405,
regarding unblock: xserver-xorg-input-mouse/1:1.7.2-3
to be marked as done.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package busybox.
The version in unstable fixes a single bug - busybox basically was
unusable on s390(x) due to a programming error. The single fix
merely removes
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 22:43:50 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
tags 680814 + patch
thanks
This bug is reproducible only on systems without networking access.
I'm attaching a patch which fixes the issue.
Hi Release Team,
would you consider this patch acceptable for an unblock request?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package ukolovnik, where I've just uploaded new upstream
version to unstable.
The only important change it brings are new
Sorry, forgot to include upstream changelog, here it is:
* New Spanish translation thanks to Matías Bellone.
* New Portuguese translation thanks to Everton R.
* Mew Chinese translation thanks to Siramizu.
* New Danish translation thanks to Aputsiaq Niels Janussen.
* Make it
On 2012-07-23 18:41, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Please unblock package dkms
My NMU dkms 2.2.0.3-1.1 fixes two bugs:
#666023 (serious): /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst fails if /lib/modules
does not exist
#657145 (important): leaves unowned empty directores, e.g.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:33:36PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Please unblock package busybox.
The version in unstable fixes a single bug - busybox basically was
unusable on s390(x) due to a programming error. The single fix
merely removes __attribute__(aligned(1)) and similar qualifiers
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (06/08/2012):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package busybox.
ACK for d-i. Thanks!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
just replying for the sake of people reading -boot@ and wondering:
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (06/08/2012):
This is fine from a RT point of view, thanks. But given that this package
needs the d-i RM ACK and I couldn't find a definite answer in the archives,
this still needs
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:49:28 +0200
with message-id 20120806094928.ga13...@spike.0x539.de
and subject line Re: Bug#684005: unblock: busybox/1:1.20.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #684005,
regarding unblock: busybox/1:1.20.0-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:02:17 +
with message-id e1syk8f-0008on...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#671115: fixed in facturlinex2 2.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #671115,
regarding transition: mysql-5.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
germinate 2.10 fixes a failure when running in the C locale, which is a
regression from the Python 2-based version in squeeze. The fix is
unit-tested and confirmed to work in Ubuntu. The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package octave-odepkg
This version fixes the RC Bug#664797 by adding a thin patch to the
upstream Makefile, that fixes the setting of a gfortran option. This was
causing one
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cyrus-sasl2
It fixes couple of mostly documentation bugs and one SELinux related
bug, and mainly the new upload fixes M-A broken by binNMU.
* New sourceful upload
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 682192 unblock: php5/5.4.4-4
Bug #682192 [release.debian.org] unblock: php5/5.4.4-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: php5/5.4.4-4' from 'unblock: php5/5.4.4-3'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
debdiff attached:
NEWS| 19 +++
changelog | 10 ++
patches/0036-add-reference-to-LDAP_SASLAUTHD-file.patch | 26
Couple of segfaults (security) fixes in addition to -3 changes and
improved wording for PHP5 CGI setup related to security.
* Fix php5-fpm segfault (PHP#62205)
* CVE-2012-2688: potential overflow in _php_stream_scandir
(Closes: #683274)
* Improve security in CGI section in README.Debian
Release Team,
Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this
migrate to testing?
As the maintainer, let me know if there is anything I can do to speed up
the process.
PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I will revert it.
I hope we can close this soon.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 683392 - moreinfo
Bug #683392 [release.debian.org] unblock:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.20-6
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #683392 to the same tags previously set
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
tag 683392 - moreinfo
thanks
On 2012-07-31 22:10, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-07-31 20:33, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
override_dh_makeshlibs:
- dh_makeshlibs -Xvdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -Xtls/libnvidia-tls.so --
-c0
+ DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL=0 dh_makeshlibs
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to upload simplesamlphp/1.9.1-1: an upstream security release
that only fixes a security issue and adds some minor documentation fixes.
The debdiff is attached.
The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nodejs
We have now adjusted nodejs as ruled by tech-ctte at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/07/msg2.html,
and consider it ready for inclusion
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package coffeescript
We have now adjusted coffeescript to use nodejs (not node) as hashbang.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/07/msg2.html,
and
Hi d-release,
F*EX is a file exchange service based on http. The previous versions did
include a java applet (F*IX) that yielded a more fancy UI than the classic
HTML web page. Upstream has dropped the entire java code base as its
maintainer is no longer able to support it. The F*EX maintainer
On 06.08.2012 14:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please unblock package nodejs
We have now adjusted nodejs as ruled by tech-ctte at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/07/msg2.html,
and consider it ready for inclusion in Wheezy.
I'm afraid that, at least imo, more than a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debdelta
there was a intl update that I had overlooked
I also corrected a typo in a man page
a.
unblock debdelta/0.49
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On 12-08-06 at 03:12pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 06.08.2012 14:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please unblock package nodejs
We have now adjusted nodejs as ruled by tech-ctte at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/07/msg2.html,
and consider it ready for inclusion in
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (06/08/2012):
Release Team,
Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this
migrate to testing? As the maintainer, let me know if there is
anything I can do to speed up the process.
PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me
Dear release team (and Matthias),
Concerning http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676423
There is a grave bug in doxygen (segfault which causes other packages to
FTBFS) which has been fixed in unstable together with other minor fixes,
including a new upstream release. I believe that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package denemo
denemo/0.9.2-2 fixes:
#665520 Including individual glib headers no longer supported
#683563 Enable hardened build flags
denemo (0.9.2-2) unstable;
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:49:11PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-08-06 17:07, Philipp Kern wrote:
I gathered. That doesn't answer my point, though. It is the *last* package
in the archive doing so, instead of using dkms.
There is nvidia-kernel-dkms, too. But for historic reasons we
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package open-iscsi
The migration to testing was blocked from long because of open-iscsi
udebs not available on all architectures. Since I last fixed the build
for specific
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:03:16PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:49:11PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-08-06 17:07, Philipp Kern wrote:
I gathered. That doesn't answer my point, though. It is the *last* package
in the archive doing so, instead of using
Processing changes file: fckeditor_2.6.6-1squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1syros-0001wn...@franck.debian.org
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
Copying debian-release@ and debian-kernel@ on what they think. To
provide context (it seems that pkg-nvidia-devel@ dropped my mails or put
it into a queue, hence they're not in a list archive):
Sorry, they're all approved now. We get unbelievable amounts
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xfonts-naga10
It contains a fix for FTBFS as reported in #682058; debdiff is attached to that
bug.
unblock xfonts-naga10/1.1-13.1
-- System Information:
Debian
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:57:31 +0100
with message-id 1344283051.2128.0.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#684084: unblock: xfonts-naga10/1.1-13.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684084,
regarding unblock: xfonts-naga10/1.1-13.1
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:20:04 +0100
with message-id 1344284404.2128.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#684052: unblock: debdelta/0.49
has caused the Debian Bug report #684052,
regarding unblock: debdelta/0.49
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:27:10 +0100
with message-id 1344284830.2128.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#684033: cyrus-sasl2/2.1.25.dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #684033,
regarding unblock: cyrus-sasl2/2.1.25.dfsg1-5
to be marked as done.
This
Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (23/07/2012):
Once d-i beta1 is released, would it be possible to unblock it? Thanks
in advance.
No objection from the d-i side: we're in the devel weeks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hey Russ,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:42:41AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Sorry, they're all approved now.
thank you.
nvidia-graphics-modules seems to be the last package to provide
pre-built kernel modules. Do we still want this for wheezy given the
maintenance hassle if there's an ABI
Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org (06/08/2012):
The only important change it brings are new translations. Besides that
it fixes few tiny errors (possibly unset variables and checking if
locales are present), see attached diff for code changes.
I think I could understand the logic behind setting
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:39:30 +0200
with message-id 20120806213930.gd10...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683952: nmu: eog_3.4.2-1 gnome-keyring_3.4.1-4
gnome-settings-daemon_3.4.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #683952,
regarding nmu: eog_3.4.2-1 gnome-keyring_3.4.1-4
Your message dated Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:50:54 +0200
with message-id 20120806215054.ge10...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683445: Consider including GMSH into Wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #683445,
regarding Consider including GMSH into Wheezy
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi Patrick.
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org (31/07/2012):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package otrs2
I have added an upstream patch to fix the postmaster module with IMAPTLS
mailboxes:
I'm afraid, this is getting a bit off-topic ...
On 2012-08-06 23:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
I'm a bit confused why that is. If I'm installing a nvidia-graphics-driver
package that does all the magic using dkms at install time, how is that more
sophisticated than providing pre-built module
Hello,
please open a bug next time (see last dda@ mail).
Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org (23/07/2012):
This version of lua5.2 fixes a nasty multiarch related issue
and the mess my previous attempt made.
Debdiff attached (w.r.t the version in weezy).
I think that's OK; unblocked.
On 2012-08-06 19:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There is actually no attempt to check or maintain ABI stability for
packages with the rt featureset (or openvz or vserver, in squeeze), as
their stable updates have been comparatively less stable. This fact
hasn't been advertised nearly as widely as
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:50:19 +0200
with message-id 20120806225019.ga16...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#682095: unblock: eblook/1:1.6.1-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #682095,
regarding unblock: eblook/1:1.6.1-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:52:17 +0200
with message-id 20120806225217.gb16...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#682096: unblock: eb/4.4.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #682096,
regarding unblock: eb/4.4.3-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
I'm a bit confused why that is. If I'm installing a
nvidia-graphics-driver package that does all the magic using dkms at
install time, how is that more sophisticated than providing pre-built
module packages, especially in the light that it's the only one
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de writes:
There are a few people that don't like the dkms way (to many
dependencies: compiler, kernel headers; leaves cruft around (I tried to
fix a bit of this in my dkms NMU); ) and prefer to take the
responsibility to provide their own kernel module
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk (06/08/2012):
Thanks for looking at this so swiftly.
I understand the worry of a slippery slope of opening the gates to
everything Nodejs. I do find it sensible, however, to consider e.g.
one of these subsets:
1) nodejs
2) nodejs + uglifyjs
3) nodejs
Hello,
(sending again, for some reason the cc to the list was dropped.)
Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org (06/08/2012):
I've just uploaded fex 20120718-4 which now addresses all currently
known issues. It would be great if this could make it into wheezy
still to spare us unneccessary work with
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2012 01:15:11 +0200
with message-id 20120806231511.gf16...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#682977: unblock: flash-kernel/3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #682977,
regarding unblock: flash-kernel/3.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hello Eric,
not sure you got that mail (at least M-F-T said you didn't want a copy):
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (31/07/2012):
On 31.07.2012 04:12, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2012 01:26:04 +0200
with message-id 20120806232604.gh16...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#684046: unblock: coffeescript/1.3.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #684046,
regarding unblock: coffeescript/1.3.3-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hello Josue,
Josue Abarca jmasli...@debian.org (06/08/2012):
denemo/0.9.2-2 fixes:
#665520 Including individual glib headers no longer supported
#683563 Enable hardened build flags
ACK on principle, but see below.
denemo (0.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
*
Hello Thijs,
Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org (06/08/2012):
I would like to upload simplesamlphp/1.9.1-1: an upstream security
release that only fixes a security issue and adds some minor
documentation fixes. The debdiff is attached.
while I have only glanced at it, that doesn't look bad at
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2012 01:46:45 +0200
with message-id 20120806234644.gc19...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#684023: unblock: octave-odepkg/0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #684023,
regarding unblock: octave-odepkg/0.8.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 7 Aug 2012 01:50:24 +0200
with message-id 20120806235024.gd19...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683977: unblock: gnome-games/3.4.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683977,
regarding unblock: gnome-games/3.4.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hello debian-cd,
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (30/07/2012):
Just put up updated details at
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/tmp/new-tasks/2012-07-30/
Gnome and KDE are looking closer, but still not there yet. Are we
going to get dpkg xz support in the archive soon?
as you might
Hello,
Thomas Müller thomas.muel...@tmit.eu (31/07/2012):
We have ownCloud 4.0.4 in testing and 4.0.5 (which fixes RC #681138)
in unstable. Just a few minutes ago upstream released 4.0.6 with
fixes to some security issues (besides other fixes).
Shall I ask for unblock of 4.0.5 and a few
Your message dated Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:28:26 +0200
with message-id 501ffeba.80...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683316: unblock: mtink/1.0.16-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #683316,
regarding unblock: mtink/1.0.16-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:21:08AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
openvswitch 1.4.2+git20120612-2 is currently in wheezy.
openvswitch 1.4.2+git20120612-8, currently in sid, fixes the
68 matches
Mail list logo
