PINJAMAN TANPA AGUNAN dr BII RATE 0.98% PAYROL

2013-03-12 Thread sandi9990
Pinjaman tanpa agunan /kredit tanpa agunan dari Bank terkemuka BII Menawarkan kepada anda untuk mendapatkan nya dengan bunga yg kompetitif hingga 0.98 % khusus payrol BII NO CREDIT CARD NO SUCCESS FEE 1.FC KTP 2.FC NOMOR REK TABUNGAN 3.FC NPWP (JIKA PINJAMAN DIATAS 50 JT ) 4.SLIP GAJI ASLI

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-12 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-03-11, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org wrote: We could simply drop upgrade-system from testing. For update-notifier, we c= annot do this, as update-notifier-kde depends on update-notifier-common, and ther= e are With the entry of apper, u-n-k can go. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: nbd freeze exception?

2013-03-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:55:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 13:58:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: What are my chances of that being allowed in? For r0 I would say it's too late. It should still be possible to include fixes in a subsequent point release.

Bug#702870: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-7

2013-03-12 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ruby1.8 This fixes #702526 (CVE-2013-1821) with a patch from Salvatore Bonaccorso. The patch is backported from the fix in Ruby 1.9 and inspired by RedHat's own

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 06:59:01AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: 2013/3/12 Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those old

Bug#702877: unblock pre-approval: python-mysqldb/1.2.3-2

2013-03-12 Thread Mika Pflueger
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I would like to ask if you would unblock a fix for #678169 (python-mysqldb: fails to connect to mysql), where python-mysqldb errorneously does not compile with SSL support, thus

Bug#702870: marked as done (unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-7)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:14:28 + with message-id de29f0b0cadbebb82d0ab7f03cf1c...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702870: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #702870, regarding unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-7 to be marked as done. This

Re: Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2013-03-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
To the release team (and Prach): Dear release team, Prach Pongpanich in the mentors list is trying to fix #701134. He is removing the Pre-Depends which was added for the release of Squeeze, because of #605867, which I filled, but can't remember what it was about. The bug

Bug#702275: unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a

2013-03-12 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: retitle -1 unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.58-1+2013b On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:50:30 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: Please unblock package libdatetime-timezone-perl 1.57-1+2013a. s/1\.57-1\+2013a/1.58-1+2013b/ The new release is based on the Olson database 2013a. It does not

Processed: Re: Bug#702275: unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: retitle -1 unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.58-1+2013b Bug #702275 [release.debian.org] unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.58-1+2013b' from 'unblock: libdatetime-timezone-perl/1.57-1+2013a'

Bug#702894: (pre-approval) unblock: bley/0.1.5-2

2013-03-12 Thread Evgeni Golov
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear RT, I would like to upload a small default-config change for the bley package. Currently, the default config includes dnsbl.njabl.org, which was shut down and should not be used

Re: New proposed-updates diff: spamassassin 3.3.1-1.1

2013-03-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, fwiw, the preferred workflow from our perspective is that the discussion about the upload happens beforehand, rather than afterwards. On 12.03.2013 16:00, Debian Queue Viewer wrote: +spamassassin (3.3.1-1.1) stable; urgency=high -1.1 seems a slightly odd version number for a maintainer

Bug#702195: symlink conffiles are not supported, causing problems for dpkg on upgrade/removal and incorrect debsums reports

2013-03-12 Thread Michael Biebl
On 09.03.2013 20:27, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: I think something like this should do: if [ $1 = upgrade ] dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 3.3.5-3; then .. fi Done. On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 15:53 +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote: I

Re: New proposed-updates diff: spamassassin 3.3.1-1.1

2013-03-12 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:14:37PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: fwiw, the preferred workflow from our perspective is that the discussion about the upload happens beforehand, rather than afterwards. Apologies. It's been a while since I uploaded to s-p-u. On 12.03.2013 16:00, Debian Queue

Re: New proposed-updates diff: spamassassin 3.3.1-1.1

2013-03-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 13:08 -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:14:37PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 12.03.2013 16:00, Debian Queue Viewer wrote: +spamassassin (3.3.1-1.1) stable; urgency=high -1.1 seems a slightly odd version number for a maintainer upload. I

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 00:42:45 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those old components are still in wheezy however, and especially

Bug#698245: marked as done (tpu: package moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:26:08 + with message-id 20130312192608.gl5...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net and subject line Re: Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2 has caused the Debian Bug report #698245, regarding tpu: package moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2 to be marked

Bug#699915: tpu: lcdf-typetools/2.92+dfsg1-1.1

2013-03-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 20:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 14:26 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: It looks like this issue still affects the unstable package; is that correct? If so then it should be resolved there

Bug#701795: marked as done (unblock: otrs2/3.1.7+dfsg1-7)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:01:53 + with message-id 20130312200153.gm5...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net and subject line Re: Bug#701795: unblock: otrs2/3.1.7+dfsg1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #701795, regarding unblock: otrs2/3.1.7+dfsg1-7 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-12 Thread Tomasz Muras
On 03/11/2013 09:35 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:43:02PM +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: On 03/11/2013 05:22 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Just to clarify before I do it: stable stays as it is; remove moodle from Wheezy and you will work on the basis of getting 2.5 into

Re: Bug#702849: RFS: php-soap/0.12.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2013-03-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 23:28 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Prach Pongpanich in the mentors list is trying to fix #701134. He is removing the Pre-Depends which was added for the release of Squeeze, because of #605867, which I filled, but can't remember what it was about. The bug report says:

Bug#693457: unblock: ibus-table/1.4.99.20121012-1

2013-03-12 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: close -1 On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 11:23:34PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, (Cc'ing all recent uploaders, in the hope that it helps finding an acceptable solution.) Closing. There has been no helpful response from the requestor or maintainers since November, despite intrigeri's

Bug#702910: unblock: checkinstall/1.6.2-4

2013-03-12 Thread Andreas Noteng
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package checkinstall This package fixes bug #702314 which has severity grave. There are unfortunately some minor changes which has nothing to do with the bug but they are

Bug#702910: marked as done (unblock: checkinstall/1.6.2-4)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:51:31 + with message-id 1363121491.6841.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702910: unblock: checkinstall/1.6.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #702910, regarding unblock: checkinstall/1.6.2-4 to be marked as done. This

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 21:06:01 +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: Great, we're not promising any security updates in *-backports, so we can have: * Moodle 1.9 in squeeze * nothing in wheezy * Moodle 2.2 with security issues in wheezy-backports, just to cover for users that want to use it for the

Processed: closing 693457

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 693457 Bug #693457 {Done: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org} [release.debian.org] unblock: ibus-table/1.4.99.20121012-1 Bug 693457 is already marked as done; not doing anything. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#702920: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-14

2013-03-12 Thread David Claughton
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package graphviz Version 2.26.3-14 fixes RC bug #702436 which addresses a security issue (links with ancient libltdl which suffers from DSA-1958-1) by switching to linking

Bug#702921: unblock: inetutils/2:1.9-2

2013-03-12 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package inetutils. This version contains a security fix cherry picked from upstream, which was fixed long time ago for other packages with a shared ancestry (iputils). The

Bug#702921: unblock: inetutils/2:1.9-2

2013-03-12 Thread Guillem Jover
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 00:58:10 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package inetutils. This version contains a security fix cherry picked from upstream, which was fixed long

Bug#702920: marked as done (unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-14)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:42:46 + with message-id 1363153366.6841.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702920: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #702920, regarding unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-14 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#702921: marked as done (unblock: inetutils/2:1.9-2)

2013-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:41:57 + with message-id 1363153317.6841.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702921: unblock: inetutils/2:1.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #702921, regarding unblock: inetutils/2:1.9-2 to be marked as done. This means