On Monday 06 May 2013 23:07:31 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu batmand_0.3.2-13 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in a clean Debian sid
environment.
batmand/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6 (=
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2013 08:54:03 +0200
with message-id 1862251.EZDUDgzp8l@sven-desktop
and subject line Re: Bug#707011: nmu: batmand_0.3.2-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #707011,
regarding nmu: batmand_0.3.2-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Arno,
I have a question on default behaviour of apache2_invoke.
If I do:
apt-get install libapache2-mod-somemodule
a2dismod somemodule
apt-get update apt-get upgrade
# libapache2-mod-somemodule gets updated
Will that get somemodule reenabled?
# Automatically added by dh_apache2
if [ $1 =
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 661958 with 707060 707061 707062 707063 707064 707065 707066
Bug #661958 [release.debian.org] transition: apache2 2.4
661958 was blocked by: 669755 669834 666854 669775 666817 669735 666832 669825
669856 670973 669777 669814 669743 669791
Le Mon, 6 May 2013 17:34:40 +0200,
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org a écrit :
Hello,
Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org (06/05/2013):
I just tried to rebuild xorg with the latest version and the build
was successful, I didn't try the other rdeps yet.
Whether it also starts successfully
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
so it is basically network board drivers from linux 2.6.32, and IDE
disk support. I for instance installed it on my Dell D430, and network
just works fine.
Hi,
I did a mistake in the first Ben file, here's the correct one:
title = php 5.5;
is_affected = .build-depends ~ php5-dev;
is_good = .depends ~ phpapi-20121212;
is_bad = .depends ~ phpapi-20100525;
notes = #706830;
Sorry,
--
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2013-05-02 13:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
Julien asked me about running piuparts tests for i386 (especially for
the multiarch-support libc6 dependency) ... I patched piuparts a bit to
support doing this on an amd64 host and started running distupgrade
tests now. squeeze2wheezy
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi release team,
I'd like to request a slot for the transition of gmtk. libgmtk0 and libgmlib0
both bumped SONAME.
gmtk and its reverse dependencies gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer
On 2013-05-06 17:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
In this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2013/05/msg2.html
we have been discussing how we could have cloud-init in the Debian
cloud
images.
One solution is to enable wheezy-backports by default in the images.
Though there are some
I am with Adam. Instead of changing what a release means to us by talking about
individual packages to somehow by some exception sneak in after the release
date, we should instead strengthen what backports.debian.org means to us and
offer those important packages immediately and officially
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:24:00PM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
1) Use backports by default in apt.source in cloud images, and we
bless this as still being Debian
Personally, I am happy with #1, so long as the rest of the community
is.
Given that backports are not installed by default, I
Hello Steffan, Adam,
I think the question for cloud images becomes: would we consider a
Debian image with backports enabled in apt.sources *by default* and to
have packages installed from backports to still be 'pure' Debian? I
would think some would feel this is not.
This was much discussed
Jay Berkenbilt qjb at debian.org writes:
hoping Jessie will ship with only one version of the tiff library:
[…]
I'd obviously like to get on this as soon as possible, but I understand
Agreed, but tiff depends on jpeg, and there are people who want to switch
jpeg to “jpeg-turbo” (still being
On 05/07/2013 08:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-05-06 17:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
In this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2013/05/msg2.html
we have been discussing how we could have cloud-init in the Debian cloud
images.
One solution is to enable wheezy-backports
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Up to today jessie did see updates for the kernel headers, eglibc, and
GCC.
What a wonderful coordination with the release team. Quoting the last
mail from them on the mailing list:
| As for Squeeze, we'd ask that you co-ordinate
Hi folks,
So, nbd 1:3.2-4 did not make the cut for wheezy, mainly because it took
some time for it to get ready; and when it finally was and I remembered
to ask about it again, it was too late.
It was hinted in the bugreport there that maybe I could still get it
into r1. I'd like to explore that
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:03:58AM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Even if I have to admit I currently don't have a lot of time, it would
have been nice to keep the other people in the team in the loop about
such an upload.
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Even if I have to admit I currently don't have a lot of time, it would
have been nice to keep the other people in the team in the loop about
such an upload.
You'd been fairly inactive of late, and I felt I'd take some initiative
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
as said in #704465 I've now uploaded libexttextcat 3.4.0 so pinot
needs a bin-NMU:
dw pinot_1.05-1 . ALL . -m 'libexttextcat-dev (= 3.4.0)'
nmu pinot_1.05-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against
Hi,
I remember talk about potentially dropping the ia64 port after wheezy
was released, but don't know about the current status.
However if this is planned it might be worth doing so soon: on ia64
about 2750 source packages depend on libunwind7 which changed its soname
to libunwind8.
Regards,
I'm an ia64 user and I would love for the port to not be dropped because I
don't like the idea of Gentoo. :(
Is libunwind8 the major blocker here? That doesn't seem too bad if it is.
I'd rather ia64 creak along than to be dropped entirely.
Patrick Baggett
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:57 AM,
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:13:28 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2013-05-02 13:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
Julien asked me about running piuparts tests for i386 (especially for
the multiarch-support libc6 dependency) ... I patched piuparts a bit to
support doing this on an amd64
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:08:18 -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
Is libunwind8 the major blocker here? That doesn't seem too bad if it is.
I'd rather ia64 creak along than to be dropped entirely.
No, the major problem is that exactly one person (Stephan Schreiber) is
working on keeping the port
[Disclaimer: I am not part of the release team]
On 07-05-13 17:59, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
What are my chances of that happening? Also, should I upload again, or
can the version that's currently in unstable be moved/copied to
stable(-proposed-updates) without problem?
As far as I understand
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:22:58 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi,
I did a mistake in the first Ben file, here's the correct one:
title = php 5.5;
is_affected = .build-depends ~ php5-dev;
is_good = .depends ~ phpapi-20121212;
is_bad = .depends ~ phpapi-20100525;
notes = #706830;
Actually
Dear Release Team,
Will the unblock-udeb hints be removed soon, or is it still necessary to
open unblock requests?
Currently this blocks a src:kfreebsd-9 security update from entering
testing, because some udebs are built from it.
src:linux also had an update recently which is blocked too.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Unfortunately, wheezy shipped with a tasksel that, on a desktop system,
selects both the desktop and the ssh server tasks for installation by
default. This was not intentional. The intent was to
Hi Steven,
(cc-ing -boot@ or me would be nice when it comes to udeb things, even
if the release team can forward requests; or if I happen to spot it
on -release@.)
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (07/05/2013):
Will the unblock-udeb hints be removed soon, or is it still
necessary to open
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:26 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Unfortunately, wheezy shipped with a tasksel that, on a desktop system,
selects both the desktop and the ssh server tasks for installation by
default. This was not intentional. The intent was to default to
selecting the desktop task on
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 19:23 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Will the unblock-udeb hints be removed soon, or is it still necessary to
open unblock requests?
I realise Cyril already replied, but for the record that's not our
decision.
The block-udeb hints are maintained by the release team
Hi Andreas,
On Dienstag, 7. Mai 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
... But it showed that we
should run Ralf Treinen's edos file overwrite checks for more
architectures than just amd64
how to run them? Does it make sense to setup jobs on jenkins.d.n for this?
(=will they ever^wusually result with
Hi RT,
On 06-05-13 23:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
So my question basically is, what would be the most appropriate order to
do things?
My proposal would be (with your approval) to just get motif into
unstable/main and start converting the dependencies with the help of
their maintainers (the
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What's the plan for fixing this in unstable / jessie? (Partly because
the preferred workflow is fix sid, propose fix, upload, and partly
because dak requires that unstable = stable.)
The fix is in unstable, and was uploaded with urgency=high
--
see shy jo
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:47 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What's the plan for fixing this in unstable / jessie? (Partly because
the preferred workflow is fix sid, propose fix, upload, and partly
because dak requires that unstable = stable.)
The fix is in unstable, and
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:32:41AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
as just discussed on IRC:
11:22 _rene_ ping?
11:23 jonas1 pong
11:23 _rene_ would you mind if I uploaded libexttextcat 3.4.0 (quite)
directly after release?
11:23 _rene_ see
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:22:05PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
openjpa failed to build (see #706176)
[...]
Will upload the new version after wheezy release[1] as announced in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670902#17
Done.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: sylves...@debian.org, mba...@debian.org
Please find attached a proposed update for LAPACK. It fixes an issue with wrong
numerical results in a multithreaded environment, so I
Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
so it is basically network board drivers from linux 2.6.32, and IDE
disk support. I for
Am 07.05.2013 17:48, schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Up to today jessie did see updates for the kernel headers, eglibc, and
GCC.
What a wonderful coordination with the release team. Quoting the last
mail from them on the mailing list:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:39:25AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 07.05.2013 17:48, schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:25:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Up to today jessie did see updates for the kernel headers, eglibc, and
GCC.
What a wonderful coordination with
On 08/05/13 00:07, Samuel Thibault wrote:
I don't know what ethernet driver these would need.
Should probably start a GNU/Hurd hardware status page on the Wiki...
Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
a) A HP DL360 or similar
The chipset has changed a bit between
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove pidgin-facebookchat from the Debian archives.
It has been abadoned by upstream nearly three years ago [1]
since Facebook has been implementing support for XMPP for
some time now
Steven Chamberlain, le Wed 08 May 2013 00:59:19 +0100, a écrit :
d) VMWare/VBox etc.
This already works.
Also, Xen support just works [...]
With network connectivity?
Sure.
If so which NIC do they emulate? (rtl8139?)
They don't emulate a nic, it's ParaVirtualization.
What
Hi,
On 07/05/13 14:25, Matthias Klose wrote:
== (e)glibc 2.17 ==
We had hoped that leaving
it FTBFS in experimental for several months and gently pinging [...]
That was a bit unexpected, and I haven't seen it brought up on
debian-bsd@ until now.
== GCC 4.8 ==
It is planned to only keep
Steven Chamberlain, le Wed 08 May 2013 00:59:19 +0100, a écrit :
Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
a) A HP DL360 or similar
The chipset has changed a bit between generations:
G1: eepro (Linux) or fxp (*BSD) driver, requiring non-free microcode
We haven't worked
I'm not happy how the architecture qualification for wheezy did go (as
communicated in the session about the status of the release at DebConf 2012). I
did criticize the attitude of the release team as overly optimistic (green
light attitude), and I do see that at least GCC and binutils don't have
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:59:38AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
They weren't coordinated within the team. Furthermore I don't consider
that eglibc was ready to go to unstable, as it was known that two
architectures were going to FTBFS, without a real try to get that fixed
(for example by
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 06:35:16PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:59:38AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
They weren't coordinated within the team. Furthermore I don't consider
that eglibc was ready to go to unstable, as it was known that two
architectures were going
Am 08.05.2013 02:31, schrieb Matthias Klose:
gabrielli as the porter box is now up again, but I don't see any real support
for mips, mipsel, s390, sparc, and maybe powerpc within Debian. Please
consider
toolchain maintenance when starting the architecture qualification for jessie.
forgot to
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:39 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
[...]
- I didn't upload linux-libc-dev myself, but until today I didn't
see any announcement or a test rebuild done by the Debian kernel
maintainers, so I did add the note about what I did see in multiple
packages when doing a
51 matches
Mail list logo
