Hi all,
@ release, I believe a transition problem has started with the upload of
the libpawlib* libraries. As mentioned before, it should have been
coordinated with you beforehand. I am sure the uploaded paw package is
build in an unclean environment, as the
@ Lifeng, have you checked that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gnome-screensaver_3.6.0-1 . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against
libgnomekbd8
a followup to the gnomekbd transition
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu owfs_2.9p0-1 . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against php5 5.5
A followup to the PHP5 transition.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gnome-sushi_3.8.0-1 . ALL . experimental . -m rebuild against
libgtksourceview-3.0-1
nmu denemo_0.9.6-1 . ALL . experimental . -m rebuild against
libgtksourceview-3.0-1
A followup for
Your message dated Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:01:06 +0200
with message-id 5218bca2.2080...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#720669: nmu: owfs_2.9p0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #720669,
regarding nmu: owfs_2.9p0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:00:01 +0200
with message-id 5218bc61.7070...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#720660: nmu: gnome-screensaver_3.6.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #720660,
regarding nmu: gnome-screensaver_3.6.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:04:44 +0200
with message-id 5218bd7c.5010...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#720671: nmu: gnome-sushi_3.8.0-1, denemo_0.9.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #720671,
regarding nmu: gnome-sushi_3.8.0-1, denemo_0.9.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello release team,
there was a bug in cernlib_20061220+dfsg3-3 that made paw FTBFS on all
architectures except amd64, would you please binNMU paw against
cernlib_20061220+dfsg3-4?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:52:57AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 24-08-13 09:43, Graham Inggs wrote:
Hi Lifeng
On 6 August 2013 20:49, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org
mailto:elb...@debian.org wrote:
@Graham. That would mean a (small) transition (distinct from the motif
pne).
On 08/24/2013 06:39 PM, Lifeng Sun wrote:
there was a bug in cernlib_20061220+dfsg3-3 that made paw FTBFS on all
architectures except amd64, would you please binNMU paw against
cernlib_20061220+dfsg3-4?
nmu paw_1:2.14.04.dfsg.2-9 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against cernlib'
Set a dep-wait on the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 706798 with 720661
Bug #706798 [release.debian.org] transition: Libav 9
706798 was blocked by: 693641 692809 693560 693639 694131 692980 692505
706798 was blocking: 716735
Added blocking bug(s) of 706798: 720661
thanks
Stopping processing
11 matches
Mail list logo