On Sun, 29 Sep 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
There is not much data on what release managers think about rushing
upgrades into p-u, but the fact there's no definitive data point on the
microcode update, and the fact that it has been available for less than
a week seem to point out that letting
Processing changes file: cups_1.5.3-5+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqay3-0007nm...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: glusterfs_3.2.7-3+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqbic-0006th...@franck.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 723569 with 722041 722020 722035 722033 722042 722040 722044 722018
722023
Bug #723569 [release.debian.org] transition: evolution-data-server 3.8 and
friends
723569 was blocked by: 722022
723569 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking
Processing changes file: glusterfs_3.2.7-3+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqezq-cl...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
As agreed with the security team and the current maintainer, we’d like
to include this security fix via the upcoming point release, because the
package has a low popcon and requires a very
Hi,
Am 21.09.2013 13:13, schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 21.09.2013 12:49, schrieb Michael Biebl:
I've filed RM requests for
tasks
contacts
dates
evolution-exchange
and poked Luca about that.
done
almanah, obexd and hdate-applet had sourceful uploads in the mean time
(either removing EDS
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 16:08:31 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Anything else we can help with?
Please let us know, so we can finish this transition as quickly as possible.
I'm waiting for a decruft of the ood eds binaries.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I would like to propose two release goals for Jessie (and probably
Jessie + 1).
First, I would like to propose a release goal which will aim to make
sure that the CC and CXX variables are honored.
Currently, last time I tried, around 40 % of the packages will not take
in account such
Am 29.09.2013 16:15, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 16:08:31 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Anything else we can help with?
Please let us know, so we can finish this transition as quickly as possible.
I'm waiting for a decruft of the ood eds binaries.
Ok, this is something
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 16:20:27 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Is anything blocking the decrufting of the eds binaries (where we,
pkg-gnome, can help with)?
No.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 16:18:32 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose two release goals for Jessie (and probably
Jessie + 1).
First, I would like to propose a release goal which will aim to make
sure that the CC and CXX variables are honored.
Currently, last time
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:07:30PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed wheezy
On 2013-09-28 19:08, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
Attached are two patches against perl 5.14.2-21 for consideration for
the next wheezy point release.
The first patch contains mainly
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:00:14PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed
On 2013-09-28 19:14, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
As discussed in #724849, this should be considered for the next
wheezy
point release.
Please go ahead; thanks.
Thanks, done.
--
To
Hi,
I noticed that there are tntnet uploads sitting in the stable NEW
and oldstable NEW queues, which appear to have been prepared for you.
I'm afraid that I'll be rejecting them, at least on the grounds that the
version number for the stable upload is 2.1-2+deb6u1, which indicates
that it was
Hi,
We're considering removing chmsee from stable due to its
non-compatibility with newer iceweasel versions; see #723116.
chmsee only has one reverse-dependency in the archive -
education-desktop-lxde, which recommends it. Given the nature of the
software, I'm not really sure why that
Processing changes file: tntnet_1.6.3-4+deb5u1_amd64.changes
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqk9f-000794...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: tntnet_2.1-2+deb6u1_amd64.changes
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqk9c-000729...@franck.debian.org
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
uploaddeal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
O.
--
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a
On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 17:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- Have they been discussed with the security team, in terms of whether
they wish to issue a DSA? There's no indication of such discussion in
the bug log for #724746 at least.
- What's the plan for getting the bug fixed in unstable?
Hi,
* Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2013-09-29 18:42]:
[...]
- Have they been discussed with the security team, in terms of whether
they wish to issue a DSA? There's no indication of such discussion in
the bug log for #724746 at least.
Yes, we advised him to fix this particular
Hi Graham,
]] Graham Whaley
sorry if you get an unwanted Cc on this, I'm not sure what, if any of
the lists you're reading.
I'd like to respond to your call for help regards the release
qualification matrix, in particular for hardware (buildd and porter
machines), and in particular for
On 29/09/2013 16:36, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 16:18:32 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose two release goals for Jessie (and probably
Jessie + 1).
First, I would like to propose a release goal which will aim to make
sure that the CC and CXX
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #724850 [release.debian.org] pu: package libdigest-sha-perl/5.71-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
724850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 16:36 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:00:14PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-09-28 19:14, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
As discussed in #724849, this should be considered for the next
wheezy
point release.
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 23:42 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Sunday, September 29, 2013 04:14:13 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com (2013-09-28):
In Wheezy, we inadvertently failed to include /usr/bin/python2. Since the
freeze/release,
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #724849 [release.debian.org] pu: package perl/5.14.2-21+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
724849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #724857 [release.debian.org] pu: package python-defaults/2.7.3-4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
724857: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724857
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 16:36 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:07:30PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-09-28 19:08, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
Attached are two patches against perl 5.14.2-21 for consideration for
the next wheezy
Hi Damyan,
Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org (2013-05-28):
This all happened, and firebird2.5 version 2.5.2.26540.ds4-1 had 20
days in unstable without new bugs. It migrated to testing after a
giveback on sparc (first attempt crashed the compiler). Perhaps it is
time to consider it for 7.0.1?
Your message dated Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:09:08 +0200
with message-id 20130929210907.gb21...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#698502: unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #698502,
regarding pu: glusterfs/3.2.7-3+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing changes file: tntnet_1.6.3-4+deb6u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqon8-0003mc...@franck.debian.org
[ Dropping Holger from Cc, jenkins is more or less irrelevant anyway. ]
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (2013-03-19):
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 13:36:31 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
I suggest preparing and proposing a Jenkins dist-upgrade job (either
as a patch against an existing appropriate
Hi Cyril,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
[ Dropping Holger from Cc, jenkins is more or less irrelevant anyway. ]
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (2013-03-19):
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 13:36:31 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
I suggest preparing and
Control: tag -1 patch
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-04-28):
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 16:47 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 04/27/2013 04:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Apologies for not getting back to you about this again sooner.
Unfortunately it's now too late
Processing control commands:
tag -1 patch
Bug #699806 [release.debian.org] pu: dlocate/1.02+deb7u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #699806 to the same tags previously set
--
699806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hi Sergei,
Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru (2013-09-30):
I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No
complains whatsoever.
yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy
upgrade testing, though, which is what we would like to avoid breaking
or
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Sergei,
Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru (2013-09-30):
I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No
complains whatsoever.
yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy
Control: tag -1 -confirmed
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2013-05-09):
Control: reopen -1
05.05.2013 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
Hmm. I didn't notice the bug has been closed...
Reopening it (now re-titled as a pu), instead of
submiting a
Processing control commands:
tag -1 -confirmed
Bug #702278 [release.debian.org] pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
--
702278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702278
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi Matthias,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Am 25.09.2013 14:52, schrieb Sergei Golovan:
There are 17 packages which build when 8.5 is the default version but
fail to build
after switching to 8.6. Most of them are patchable, though I'm not
sure if
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org (2013-04-03):
This update fixes several upgrade issues (see #667599 and duplicates)
involving hdf5. While it is not a perfect solution (there are still some
upgrade paths failing), it is an improvement over what is currently in
wheezy. A better solution would
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-08-19):
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 22:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 18:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 15:46 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
It fixes one important bug [1] which prevents certain
Processing control commands:
tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #706281 [release.debian.org] pu: libusb/0.1.12-20+nmu2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
706281: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org (2013-06-03):
On 2013-05-22 01:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'm not sure about the practical impact, besides “it's not nice to
have undeterministic behaviours”. AFAICT, the extra .so doesn't hurt
when it's here (you wouldn't suggest
Last ping before we close this pu request.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-08-19):
Ping?
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 12:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 14:54 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
I'd like to upload net-snmp package due to fix piuparts
Your message dated Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:30:38 +0200
with message-id 20130929223038.gl21...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#708521: pu: package gcc-4.7/4.7.2-5+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #708521,
regarding pu: package gcc-4.7/4.7.2-5+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 724861 + wheezy
Bug #724861 [release.debian.org] pu: package intel-microcode/1.20130906.1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
tags 724895 + wheezy
Bug #724895 [release.debian.org] pu: package
perspectives-extension/4.3.1-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org (2013-06-10):
--- redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-01-19 15:54:09.0
+0100
+++ redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-06-10 01:01:48.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+redmine
Processing control commands:
tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #711551 [release.debian.org] pu: package redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #711551 [release.debian.org] pu: package redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
711551:
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org (2013-06-26):
Dear release team,
Wheezy has been released with a version of tgt which doesn't have an init
script. I fixed the version in Sid on the 2013-05-21 (adding the missing
init.d script).
Now, I would like to upload a fix for Wheezy. The
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-08-10):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 14:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
this proposed update for nova fixes CVE-2013-2096. AFAIK this is just a
DoS, so probably not worth a DSA.
The fix for sid is pending NEW
Hi David,
David Prévot taf...@debian.org (2013-07-12):
The recent ice{weasel,dove} upgrade via debian-security broke some
xul-ext-$stuff, and some of them can simply be fixed by updating the
supported versions.
FireTray is not among those, not only it will FTBFS with the
xulrunner-dev
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org (2013-07-21):
But it might make sense to include the patch:
* Patch userland for 3.X kernels
While there is no bug report for that, it fixes the ndiswrapper
tool to use modprobe.d and modprobe.conf on 3.X kernels, instead of
Processing control commands:
tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #717445 [release.debian.org] pu: package ndiswrapper/1.57-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
717445: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717445
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (2013-07-21):
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 15:27:17 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2013-07-21 15:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Whichever solution was chosen, it looks like this bug is not fixed in
unstable yet?
Yes, I wanted to write a sentence about
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org (2013-07-21):
On 2013-07-21 18:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 16:51 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
the change I suggested for sysvinit (#694252) and got applied in
sysvinit/2.88dsf-41+deb7u1 does not fix the bootchart upgrade path
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Cyril,
Thanks for getting back to this request.
Le 29/09/2013 18:58, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Does that
version work with the ice* packages we currently have in stable still?
Just tested again (I think I already did, but since I didn’t
Control: tag -1 -patch +confirmed
[ We don't use the patch tag for pu requests. ;) ]
Hi Eric,
Eric Evans eev...@sym-link.com (2013-09-23):
[ Cyril Brulebois ]
it looks reasonable to me; please post a debdiff with that patch applied
on top of 0.6.6.2-6, versioned as 0.6.6.2-6+deb7u1 (I
Processing control commands:
tag -1 -patch +confirmed
Bug #719520 [release.debian.org] pu: package coherence/0.6.6.2-6
Removed tag(s) patch.
Bug #719520 [release.debian.org] pu: package coherence/0.6.6.2-6
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
719520:
David Prévot taf...@debian.org (2013-09-29):
Le 29/09/2013 18:58, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Does that version work with the ice* packages we currently have in
stable still?
Just tested again (I think I already did, but since I didn’t mentioned
it in my previous longish message, I have a
Your message dated Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:41:20 +0200
with message-id 20130929234120.gi3...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#715552: pu: package nova/2012.1.1-18+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #715552,
regarding pu: package nova/2012.1.1-18+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #720426 [release.debian.org] pu: package openssl/1.0.1e-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
720426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2013-09-23):
ping? The p-u freeze for 7.2 is getting closer:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/09/msg00477.html
It's now 1 week closer.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be (2013-09-23):
I actually consider the arm assembler and nistp curves to be
important, even if the bugs might only be filed at severity
level wishlist. The nistp curves are even security related
since they are then implemented with constant
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Michael Prokop m...@debian.org (2013-09-23):
New debdiff attached.
Looks good to me, please upload.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing control commands:
tag -1 confirmed
Bug #723632 [release.debian.org] pu: fai/4.0.8 - wheezy point-release update
for FAI
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
723632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
David Prévot taf...@debian.org (2013-09-29):
Hi,
As agreed with the security team and the current maintainer, we’d like
to include this security fix via the upcoming point release, because the
package has a low popcon and requires a very unusual configuration to
Processing control commands:
tag -1 confirmed
Bug #724895 [release.debian.org] pu: package
perspectives-extension/4.3.1-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
724895: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724895
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 29/09/2013 20:08, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
It would be nice if this could be tracked in the Debian BTS as well,
#724960 opened.
feel free to upload with a closes: added
Done, thanks for your quick and positive feedback.
Regards
* Ondřej Surý (ond...@sury.org) wrote:
Hi,
recent automake transition to 1.14 broke (FTBFS) at least two of my
packages.
Would it be possible to coordinate the (next) transition better than
uploaddeal with breakages like we do with the rest of our packages?
Did the transition from
Processing changes file: glusterfs_3.2.7-3+deb7u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdigest-sha-perl_5.71-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdigest-sha-perl_5.71-2+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: tntnet_1.6.3-4+deb6u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tntnet_1.6.3-4+deb6u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tntnet_1.6.3-4+deb6u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tntnet_1.6.3-4+deb6u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tntnet_1.6.3-4+deb6u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqv9w-00084j...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: perl_5.14.2-21+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: perl_5.14.2-21+deb7u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdigest-sha-perl_5.71-2+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tntnet_2.1-2+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To
Processing changes file: tntnet_2.1-2+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqvct-00043v...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: perl_5.14.2-21+deb7u1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqvr0-0005y4...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: tntnet_2.1-2+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vqw5w-0008n1...@franck.debian.org
78 matches
Mail list logo
