*

Здравствуйте. Производим на своем оборудовании металло-тентовые манежи для - укрытия мини-футбольных полей Мобильные сооружения имеют великолепный эстетический вид и прочные конструкции. И главное – низкая стоимость, по сравнению с капитальными сооружениями. Сообщите пожалуйста интересуют ли Вас

Bug#750846: wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u3

Control: tags -1 + pending On 2014-06-09 23:17, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Monday, June 09, 2014 23:05:21 Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 10:05 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: This is a small, low risk change cherry-picked from upstream that fixes a significant issue reported by a

Processed: Re: Bug#750846: wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u3

Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #750846 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 750846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750846 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wuyys-zr...@franck.debian.org

Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (6.0.10)

On 06/11/2014 09:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The next (and final) point release for squeeze (6.0.10) just to be sure: does this mean that squeeze will move to archive.debian.org soon-ish after that? since there's squeeze-lts, i guess it doesn't. however, we need to know because in the final

Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (6.0.10)

Am 12.06.2014 08:55, schrieb Daniel Baumann: On 06/11/2014 09:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The next (and final) point release for squeeze (6.0.10) just to be sure: does this mean that squeeze will move to archive.debian.org soon-ish after that? since there's squeeze-lts, i guess it

Bug#750699: micro release from upstream!

Control: tags -1 + pending On 2014-06-12 6:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:40 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: Yay! I was able to convince upstream to do a micro release, so now the delta is tiny. I've attached the new debdiff, which shows just the cert chain and algo updates, with

Processed: Re: Bug#750699: micro release from upstream!

Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #750699 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package duo-unix/1.9.11-1~deb7u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 750699: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750699 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: duo-unix_1.8.1-1~deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wuzut-0007ej...@franck.debian.org

Bug#743540: marked as done (nmu: gpac, poppler: openjpeg transition in experimental)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:39:37 +0200 with message-id 53996749.5070...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#743540: nmu: gpac, poppler: openjpeg transition in experimental has caused the Debian Bug report #743540, regarding nmu: gpac, poppler: openjpeg transition in experimental to be

Bug#746805: transition: gfortran module version changing from 10 to 12

Le mercredi 11 juin 2014 à 21:30 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : Alastair, Sebastien, gfortran-4.9 is now the default for all release architectures. Can you proceed with the binNMUs? I am no Release Team member, so I can hardly schedule the binNMUs. I already indicated in this bug report

Bug#746805: transition: gfortran module version changing from 10 to 12

On 12/06/14 10:48, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Le mercredi 11 juin 2014 à 21:30 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : Alastair, Sebastien, gfortran-4.9 is now the default for all release architectures. Can you proceed with the binNMUs? I am no Release Team member, so I can hardly schedule the

Bug#751115: transition: wxsvg

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: If there are no rdeps, then there is no problem :) Go ahead with this whenever you want. Done, thanks! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu

Processed: forcibly merging 751223 751381

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 751223 751381 Bug #751223 [openchange] unmet dependencies Bug #751381 [openchange] missing dependencies in openchangeserver package in wheezy 751381 was not blocked by any bugs. 751381 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s)

Any plans getting fix for bug#747532 into next stable release?

Hi, Good that bug#747532 was fixed in icedove 30.0~b1-1. That is arguably of no use, however, if not then also fixed in stable. Any plans on doing that? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [

Any plans getting fix for bug#747546 into next stable release?

Hi, Good that bug#747546 was fixed in icedove 30.0~b1-1. That is arguably of no use, however, if not then also fixed in stable. Any plans on doing that? (see also the related bug#747532 - sorry for not posting together) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.:

Re: Bug#747532: Any plans getting fix for bug#747532 into next stable release?

Hello Jonas, Am 12.06.2014 14:49, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: That is arguably of no use, however, if not then also fixed in stable. Any plans on doing that? same here too of course [1]. [1]

Re: Bug#747546: Any plans getting fix for bug#747546 into next stable release?

Hello Jonas, Am 12.06.2014 14:58, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: That is arguably of no use, however, if not then also fixed in stable. Any plans on doing that? yes of course. It's already prepared [1] for the next version 24.6.0 of Icedove. The version 24.6.0 for the Thunderbird package was

Re: Bug#747546: Any plans getting fix for bug#747546 into next stable release?

Hi Carsten, Quoting Carsten Schoenert (2014-06-12 15:14:40) Am 12.06.2014 14:58, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: That is arguably of no use, however, if not then also fixed in stable. Any plans on doing that? yes of course. Great you see it that way - and sorry if my lack of faith was seen as

Bug#749461: marked as done (nmu: dolfin_1.3.0+dfsg-2)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:22:56 +0200 with message-id 5399b7c0.5060...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#749461: nmu: dolfin_1.3.0+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #749461, regarding nmu: dolfin_1.3.0+dfsg-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#746335: marked as done (nmu: libvtk-dicom0.4_0.4.5-1)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:30:58 +0200 with message-id 5399b9a2.2040...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#746335: nmu: libvtk-dicom0.4_0.4.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #746335, regarding nmu: libvtk-dicom0.4_0.4.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#747250: nmu: ppl_1:1.1-2

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 16:26:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 06/05/14 20:09, Євгеній Мещеряков wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please rebuild ppl against new swi-prolog, it's needed beacuse

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_mipsel.changes

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_powerpc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wv8cb-0002sp...@franck.debian.org

Bug#739468: marked as done (nmu: cubemap_1.0.3-1)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:30:54 +0200 with message-id 5399e3ce.3040...@debian.org and subject line nmu: cubemap_1.0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #739468, regarding nmu: cubemap_1.0.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#738211: marked as done (nmu: maliit-framework_0.94.1-1)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:35:02 +0200 with message-id 5399e4c6.7040...@debian.org and subject line nmu: maliit-framework_0.94.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #738211, regarding nmu: maliit-framework_0.94.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#733684: marked as done (nmu: opensmtpd_5.3.3p1-4)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:42:33 +0200 with message-id 5399e689.6000...@debian.org and subject line nmu: opensmtpd_5.3.3p1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #733684, regarding nmu: opensmtpd_5.3.3p1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#741542: marked as done (nmu: proftpd-mod-* modules)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:46:44 +0200 with message-id 5399e784.20...@debian.org and subject line nmu: proftpd-mod-* modules has caused the Debian Bug report #741542, regarding nmu: proftpd-mod-* modules to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: duo-unix_1.8.1-1~deb7u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#736117: marked as done (nmu: libgeo-proj4-perl_1.04-1)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:49:55 +0200 with message-id 5399e843.5020...@debian.org and subject line nmu: libgeo-proj4-perl_1.04-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #736117, regarding nmu: libgeo-proj4-perl_1.04-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#738351: marked as done (nmu: jd_1:2.8.6-130518-2~bpo70+1)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:56:09 +0200 with message-id 5399e9b9.9060...@debian.org and subject line nmu: jd_1:2.8.6-130518-2~bpo70+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #738351, regarding nmu: jd_1:2.8.6-130518-2~bpo70+1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#751420: pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140430.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Please approve stable upload of package intel-microcode/1.20140430.1 I'd like to update the intel-microcode package in stable non-free with the current version of the intel-microcode. There

Bug#740561: Bug#739261: libhdf5-openmpi-dev: Version in stable (wheezy) does not work with gfortran from stable

On 04/06/14 01:17, Gilles Filippini wrote: Hi, Frank Loeffler a écrit , Le 03/06/2014 21:01: Being hit by this myself now, I am a bit surprised by the reaction can wait a little longer, for an issue that clearly breaks the Fortran interface and seems to be easily fixable. But this aside -

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u4_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wv9k9-00084f...@franck.debian.org

Bug#652258: marked as done (nmu: gerris_20110329-dfsg.2-1)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:20:15 +0200 with message-id 5399ef5f.9060...@debian.org and subject line nmu: gerris_20110329-dfsg.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652258, regarding nmu: gerris_20110329-dfsg.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: tagging 751420

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 751420 + wheezy Bug #751420 [release.debian.org] pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140430.1 Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 751420:

Bug#751267: pu: package pydap/2.2.6.7-1.1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:21 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: python-dap in stable is affected by #709376, which causes spurious warnings from python in unrelated scripts. Proposed debdiff: diff -Nru pydap-2.2.6.7/debian/changelog pydap-2.2.6.7/debian/changelog

Processed: Re: Bug#751267: pu: package pydap/2.2.6.7-1.1

Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #751267 [release.debian.org] pu: package pydap/2.2.6.7-1.1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 751267: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751267 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#751139: wheezy-pu: package dbus/1.6.8-1+deb7u2

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 22:35 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 at 18:51:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: I still need to confirm the attached patch on a wheezy system, but assuming it works and fixes the vulnerability, may I upload? (Tested on

Processed: Re: Bug#751139: wheezy-pu: package dbus/1.6.8-1+deb7u2

Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #751139 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package dbus/1.6.8-1+deb7u2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 751139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751139 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Processed: Re: Bug#750222: wheezy-pu: package unbound (NMU)

Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #750222 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package unbound/1.4.17-3+deb7u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 750222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750222 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#750222: wheezy-pu: package unbound (NMU)

Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 21:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 19:01 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: I would like to NMU unbound to stable, because it crashes when validating DNSSEC on multiple threads simultaneously. The relevant Debian bug #691528

Bug#751139: wheezy-pu: package dbus/1.6.8-1+deb7u2

On 12/06/14 19:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 at 18:51:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: I still need to confirm the attached patch on a wheezy system, but assuming it works and fixes the vulnerability, may I upload? Please go ahead; thanks. dbus/1.6.8-1+deb7u2 is now in

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_multi.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wvauj-0007rr...@franck.debian.org

Bug#740561: Bug#739261: libhdf5-openmpi-dev: Version in stable (wheezy) does not work with gfortran from stable

fixed 739261 hdf5/1.8.12+docs-1.1 thanks Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit , Le 12/06/2014 20:11: On 04/06/14 01:17, Gilles Filippini wrote: Hi, Frank Loeffler a écrit , Le 03/06/2014 21:01: Being hit by this myself now, I am a bit surprised by the reaction can wait a little longer, for an

Bug#747250: nmu: ppl_1:1.1-2

12 червня 2014 о 18:14 +0200 Julien Cristau написав(-ла): What library changed its SONAME? I suspect the issue is: That's right. libppl-swi/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox ( 6.6.3.0~) libppl-swi/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: swi-prolog-nox ( 6.6.3.0~)

Processed: Re: Bug#751139: wheezy-pu: package dbus/1.6.8-1+deb7u2

Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #751139 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package dbus/1.6.8-1+deb7u2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 751139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751139 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#751139: wheezy-pu: package dbus/1.6.8-1+deb7u2

Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 20:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: On 12/06/14 19:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 at 18:51:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: I still need to confirm the attached patch on a wheezy system, but assuming it works and fixes the

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wvd4p-md...@franck.debian.org

Bug#747250: nmu: ppl_1:1.1-2

Am 12.06.2014 23:29, schrieb Євгеній Мещеряков: 12 червня 2014 о 18:14 +0200 Julien Cristau написав(-ла): Євгеній, libswipl should really be its own split out binary package. And change package names when its SONAME changes. I was thinking about it but, that library changes soname with every

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.17-3+deb7u1_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wveez-0002sc...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wvjcq-0007hj...@franck.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#749944: build ogre-1.9 against new boost-defaults 1.55?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 744171 by 749944 Bug #744171 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 744171 was not blocked by any bugs. 744171 was blocking: 749749 Added blocking bug(s) of 744171: 749944 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u2_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of