Hi guys,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 is still growing,
and porting all the patches to 2.24.90.20141023-1 is getting less and less
trivial. If you short the distance with the upstream version, that will put a
lot of work of the security-team off :)
Thanks for your
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:06:20 +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
Hi,
I fixed #777564 yesterday, a bug in quota that prevents it from working
with IPV6 NFS servers. Since there was a difference in a compatible
structure definition the bug *may* have a security implication. Now I
wonder if it
I can help, but I'm not a dev or maintainer.
I've posted in devel mailing list that I'm available for help, and got a
reply from Jay that I'd need to find a sponser...
Anyone interested in taking over as maintainer- I'm more than happy to
give a helping hand.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-debbugs-cc: k...@debian.org
Please unblock package xorg-server. New upstream stable release with a
few bugfixes including a CVE and a regression from the last batch of
CVEs. Nothing
I am not going to be able to handle the ICU transition and am looking
for a new maintainer for ICU (an RFA is open). Whoever takes over ICU
will have to manage the transition to whatever version of ICU is current
at the time, and it will have to be handled after jessie is released.
--
To
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2015-02-11 05:36, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Usertags: jessie-pu
A security issue was found in cgmanager, allowing root-owned privileged
containers to fully administer cgroups on the host.
Hi,
DSA is concerned about the current state of our buildd's readyness for jessie.
The Debian buildd network uses a fork of the buildd and sbuild packages instead
of the packages we ship in the archive. The reasons why we are still doing
that are not entirely clear, but that's the status quo.
On 2015-02-11 19:57, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2015-02-11 05:36, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Usertags: jessie-pu
A security issue was found in cgmanager, allowing root-owned privileged
containers to
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
Ok, are we guaranteed that pcgpath ends with the path separator? Consider:
No in fact I think we're guaranteed it won't.
/foo/bar
/foo/bar2/somewhere-else
Unless the path separator is included in the end (i.e. it always uses
/foo/bar/
Here is a new debdiff. (tested in its original upstream version
in v0.36) Maybe it would've been easier to squash the two patches,
but this way it's easier to tell whether the patches match what is
upstream.
diff -Nru cgmanager-0.33/debian/changelog cgmanager-0.33/debian/changelog
---
Processing control commands:
tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #777649 [release.debian.org] cgmanager security update for jessie
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
777649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777649
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2015-02-12 05:32, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Here is a new debdiff. (tested in its original upstream version
in v0.36) Maybe it would've been easier to squash the two patches,
but this way it's easier to tell whether the patches match what is
upstream.
Hi,
I fixed #777564 yesterday, a bug in quota that prevents it from working
with IPV6 NFS servers. Since there was a difference in a compatible
structure definition the bug *may* have a security implication. Now I
wonder if it makes sense and is still possible to migrate the latest
version of
2015-02-10 23:15 GMT+01:00 Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org:
Le 2015-02-09 08:25, Mathieu Parent (Debian) a écrit :
you can now:
unblock ctdb/2.5.4+debian0-4
Done.
Thanks for your work!
Thanks Medhi
--
Mathieu Parent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
+ * Switch versioned Breaks for trigger cycles from to = relations (with
+the necessary version adjustments).
Your changelog and commit message describe the change in the wrong direction,
the patch shows it the other way:
- auctex (= 11.87-3),
+ auctex ( 11.87-3+deb8u1),
Andreas
--
To
Le Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:05:01 +0100,
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 00:21:53 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
[...]
What would be the opinion of the RT about this change?
We (or at least I) prefer to see proposed changes in the mail to
having to
On 9 February 2015 at 09:36, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
I'm afraid we cannot accept 0.21.3-1.1 in Jessie because the changes are
quite large. Can you please prepare an upload targetting jessie based on
0.21.1-2.1?
Thanks for looking at this. I have created a patch that backport
17 matches
Mail list logo
