NEW changes in oldstable-new

Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy10_mips.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: base-files_8+deb8u4_mips.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: base-files_8+deb8u4_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_8+deb8u4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_8+deb8u4_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_8+deb8u4_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

NEW changes in oldstable-new

Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy10_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy10_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy10_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy10_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing

Bug#765639: Bug#802159: New OpenSSL upstream version

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 06:38:31AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 23:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > However 1.0.1q hasn't been in stable at all, which is presumably what > > you'd be proposing introducing to oldstable at this juncture. (and which > > we'd therefore

Re: Qt and OpenSSL transition metadata in relation to Mumble package

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:20:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I don't think dlopen(libssl) vs gcc -lssl makes any difference > licensing-wise, I suspect either they're both ok or they're both not > ok... I assume the problem is not with Qt itself, but with other applications making use of Qt.

NEW changes in oldstable-new

Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy10_amd64.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: base-files_8+deb8u4_amd64.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: torbrowser-launcher_0.1.9-1+deb8u3_i386.changes ACCEPT

Processed: block 819247 with 819443

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 819247 with 819443 Bug #819247 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package java-common/0.47 819247 was not blocked by any bugs. 819247 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 819247: 819443 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#819444: jessie-pu: package libreoffice-nlpsolver/0.9~beta1-10+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, While doing the bug for wheezy, and when fixing #728792 there I think we of course should also do it in stable :) Diff: diff -Nru nlpsolver-0.9~beta1/debian/changelog

Bug#819443: wheezy-pu: package libreoffice-nlpsolver/0.9~beta1-9+deb7u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I've seen #819247. That was fixed in -10 but we should fix it for wheezy, too of course when #819247 is done in stable. While at it we should fix #728792, too. Diff: diff

Processed: mypaint: diff for NMU version 1.2.0-1.1

Processing control commands: > block 650601 by -1 Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6 650601 was blocked by: 810202 809867 809921 809945 662522 635945 809951 809941 809944 809869 662550 649798 650571 810171 809942 650483 809863 809897 809910 809933 816116 810169 809905

Processed: juce: diff for NMU version 4.1.0+repack-3.1

Processing control commands: > block 650601 by -1 Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6 650601 was blocked by: 809955 809881 809936 816114 810185 662416 649552 809885 809883 810188 741891 809935 662522 809937 809933 810170 809905 809860 649547 809892 809910 809940 650571

Processed: eviacam: diff for NMU version 2.0.3-1.1

Processing control commands: > block 650601 by -1 Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6 650601 was blocked by: 810168 662437 816116 810203 662407 809894 809907 809960 809938 650483 809913 635704 810195 810174 809952 809864 809884 809939 648131 809890 741891 819428 809891

Processed (with 2 errors): bwbar: diff for NMU version 1.2.3-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 662278 + patch Bug #662278 [src:bwbar] bwbar: Please Build-Depends on libpng-dev, change from libpng12-dev Added tag(s) patch. > tags 662278 + pending Bug #662278 [src:bwbar] bwbar: Please Build-Depends on libpng-dev, change from libpng12-dev Added tag(s)

Processed: block 650601 with 662278

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 650601 with 662278 Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6 650601 was blocked by: 662523 816114 662443 810179 648129 810175 811370 809938 809960 809861 809882 810185 809865 650489 810197 662465 809895 816102 809910 809893

Bug#819409: jessie-pu: package: torbrowser-launcher/0.1.9-1+deb8u3

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:59:58AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Technically this upload was too late for 8.4, but to save us all having > to deal with things breaking before 8.5 I've accepted the package. thanks! :) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: apitrace: diff for NMU version 6.1+git20150626.62ad71c6+repack-1.1

Processing control commands: > block 650601 by -1 Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6 650601 was blocked by: 662407 742655 650571 810193 810192 810183 810178 662437 810195 809890 810172 809946 662476 635704 741891 809888 649798 809887 809870 810202 662381 810166 816114

Re: tagging 816205

On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 14:39 +0200, Mathieu Parent (Debian) wrote: > 2016-03-26 18:35 GMT+01:00 Adam D. Barratt : > > On Sat, 2016-03-26 at 17:14 +0100, Mathieu Parent wrote: > >> tags 816205 + jessie-ignore > >> thanks > > > > Was that discussed with anyone on the Release

Re: tagging 816205

2016-03-26 18:35 GMT+01:00 Adam D. Barratt : > On Sat, 2016-03-26 at 17:14 +0100, Mathieu Parent wrote: >> tags 816205 + jessie-ignore >> thanks > > Was that discussed with anyone on the Release Team before the tag was > added? No.I've done it to remove this bug from my

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: torbrowser-launcher_0.1.9-1+deb8u3_amd64.changes ACCEPT

Bug#819409: jessie-pu: package: torbrowser-launcher/0.1.9-1+deb8u3

Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 02:04 -0400, Holger Levsen wrote: > please accept torbrowser-launcher 0.1.9-1+deb8u3 into the upcoming point > release to prevent breakage when www.tor-project.org changes its ssl > certificate (which is valid til May 3rd 2016, so this is very

Processed: Re: Bug#819409: jessie-pu: package: torbrowser-launcher/0.1.9-1+deb8u3

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #819409 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package: torbrowser-launcher/0.1.9-1+deb8u3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 819409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819409 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#819243: jessie-pu, wheezy-pu: package librsvg/2.40.5-1 and librsvg/2.36.1-2

On Sat, 2016-03-26 at 23:58 +0100, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > Thanks. Packages uploaded. It looks like you uploaded only the source and arch:all packages for jessie, but named the changes file _amd64.changes. Please don't do that, as it blocks the buildd upload from that architecture (due to

Bug#819409: jessie-pu: package: torbrowser-launcher/0.1.9-1+deb8u3

package: release.debian.org tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu x-debbugs-cc: pkg-privacy-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear release team, (this mail is probably more complicated than the changes proposed…) please accept torbrowser-launcher