Re: migration exception for mhap

2016-07-24 Thread Afif Elghraoui
على الأحد 24 تـمـوز 2016 ‫05:32، كتب Jonathan Wiltshire: > On 2016-07-23 23:14, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >> >> mhap is arch:all. libssw-java contains Java bindings for its C library >> and is not supported on i386. The dependencies are not broken. I hope >> this is a clear enough explanation. > >

Bug#831810: transition: libmicrohttpd

2016-07-24 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-07-23 20:30, Bertrand Marc wrote: Hi, Le 23/07/2016 à 11:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : On 23/07/16 11:35, Bertrand Marc wrote: Do you think we could allow the libmicrohttpd transition ? Yes. Go ahead. Thanks ! I uploaded a new revision targeting unstable to mentors [1] and

Bug#832171: jessie-pu: package dietlibc/0.33~cvs20120325-6

2016-07-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 22:45 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 07/24/2016 10:18 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: [...] > > and potentially minit, > > depending on whether you want to remove it or not. > > nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security, rebuild against fixed > dietlibc" Salvatore

Bug#832171: jessie-pu: package dietlibc/0.33~cvs20120325-6

2016-07-24 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/24/2016 10:18 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 07/23/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Since dietlibc is a static library, after the upload, there will need >> to be binNMUs in stable for the following three packages: >> >> nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security: rebuild

Bug#832171: jessie-pu: package dietlibc/0.33~cvs20120325-6

2016-07-24 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/23/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Since dietlibc is a static library, after the upload, there will need > to be binNMUs in stable for the following three packages: > > nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security: rebuild against fixed > dietlibc" > nmu mksh_50d-5 . ALL .

NEW changes in stable-new

2016-07-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_armhf.changes ACCEPT

Bug#832336: jessie-pu: package systemd/215-17+deb8u5

2016-07-24 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 24.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: jessie > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Dear release team, > > for the upcoming jessie stable release, I'd like to update the systemd > package with the

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:43:19 -0500 Don Armstrong wrote: [...] > I'll try to check out snapshots > later this week to see if I can figure out when the transition actually > happened, or if there was something else going on in the archive to > explain it. Thanks for your help! Please keep us

Bug#831810: transition: libmicrohttpd

2016-07-24 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Bertrand, On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 09:30:22PM +0200, Bertrand Marc wrote: > >> Do you think we could allow the libmicrohttpd transition ? > > Yes. Go ahead. > Thanks ! I uploaded a new revision targeting unstable to > mentors [1] thanks, uploaded to sid. -- cheers, Holger

Bug#830997: release.debian.org: Permission to consider dpkg-buildpackage -A bugs as RC

2016-07-24 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 23/07/16 19:20, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Still ok to consider this as a release goal? > > Absolutely. Great, thanks! On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The additional bugs I filed are at: > >

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:24:19 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote: > [...] > > > Should be contacted, perhaps? > > > > Sure, if you'd like to. > > Dear BTS owner, > could you please

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:24:19 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Should be contacted, perhaps? > > Sure, if you'd like to. Dear BTS owner, could you please investigate on what happened to bug #830267 on 2016-07-19T10:00 ?

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote: I hope it's possible to investigate further, in order to find out what really happened: needless to say, I think that the correctness of the migration process is of great importance to the quality of Debian testing (and, consequently, of future stable

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:51:45 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On 2016-07-24 11:20, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Dear Release Team, could you please explain what I failed to understand > > about the testing migration rules [2]? > > Your understanding is correct - an RC bug affecting sid and

Bug#832333: marked as done (nmu: sikulix_1.1.0-1~exp3)

2016-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:58:55 +0100 with message-id <9437ab558259338e5559bbe26691d...@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#832333: nmu: sikulix_1.1.0-1~exp3 has caused the Debian Bug report #832333, regarding nmu: sikulix_1.1.0-1~exp3 to be marked as done. This

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-07-24 11:20, Francesco Poli wrote: In the meanwhile, dpkg/1.18.9 managed to migrate to testing [1], despite introducing this RC bug: I wonder how that was even possible... do the testing migration checks skip pending RC bugs?!? a pending bug is not a fixed bug!!! I am Cc-ing the Release

Bug#832336: jessie-pu: package systemd/215-17+deb8u5

2016-07-24 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 24.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl: > * Fix prepare priority queue comparison function in sd-event. > Otherwise a disabled event source can get swapped with an enabled one > and cause a severe sd-event malfunction, breaking the event loop. > (Closes: #789796) > >

Bug#828187: transition: rtmidi

2016-07-24 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-07-24 13:18, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: all packages related to rtmidi transition are fixed and uploaded to unstable. Can I now upload rtmidi 2.1.1 to unstable? Yes please. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Bug#832336: jessie-pu: package systemd/215-17+deb8u5

2016-07-24 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear release team, for the upcoming jessie stable release, I'd like to update the systemd package with the following fixes: systemd (215-17+deb8u5) stable; urgency=medium * Use

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] migration exception for mhap

2016-07-24 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-07-23 23:14, Afif Elghraoui wrote: على السبت 23 تـمـوز 2016 ‫06:56، كتب Jonathan Wiltshire: On 2016-07-23 09:22, Afif Elghraoui wrote: The latest upstream release of the mhap package adds a new dependency on libssw-java, which is not available for i386. The testing excuses page for

Bug#828187: transition: rtmidi

2016-07-24 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
" -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Komu: Jaromír Mikeš , 828...@bugs.debian.org Datum: 28. 6. 2016 10:52:18 Předmět: Re: Bug#828187: transition: rtmidi "Control: tags -1 confirmed On 27/06/16 18:44, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >

Bug#832333: nmu: sikulix_1.1.0-1~exp3

2016-07-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu sikulix_1.1.0-1~exp3 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libopencv-highgui2.4-deb0" There was yet another opencv transition in sid ... Andreas

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:14:10 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote: [...] > On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 20:37:39 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: dpkg > > Version: 1.18.9 > > Severity: serious > > > > dpkg fails to purge a package [...] > > Hmm, thanks for the report, I know where this is coming

Bug#830997: release.debian.org: Permission to consider dpkg-buildpackage -A bugs as RC

2016-07-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 23/07/16 19:20, Santiago Vila wrote: > Kind Release Managers: > > All the bugs reported by Lucas Nussbaum last week which have not been > resolved yet are now either in "pending upload" state, or there is a > patch available: > >