على الأحد 24 تـمـوز 2016 05:32، كتب Jonathan Wiltshire:
> On 2016-07-23 23:14, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>>
>> mhap is arch:all. libssw-java contains Java bindings for its C library
>> and is not supported on i386. The dependencies are not broken. I hope
>> this is a clear enough explanation.
>
>
On 2016-07-23 20:30, Bertrand Marc wrote:
Hi,
Le 23/07/2016 à 11:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
On 23/07/16 11:35, Bertrand Marc wrote:
Do you think we could allow the libmicrohttpd transition ?
Yes. Go ahead.
Thanks ! I uploaded a new revision targeting unstable to
mentors [1] and
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 22:45 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 07/24/2016 10:18 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
[...]
> > and potentially minit,
> > depending on whether you want to remove it or not.
>
> nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security, rebuild against fixed
> dietlibc"
Salvatore
On 07/24/2016 10:18 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 07/23/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Since dietlibc is a static library, after the upload, there will need
>> to be binNMUs in stable for the following three packages:
>>
>> nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security: rebuild
On 07/23/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Since dietlibc is a static library, after the upload, there will need
> to be binNMUs in stable for the following three packages:
>
> nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security: rebuild against fixed
> dietlibc"
> nmu mksh_50d-5 . ALL .
Processing changes file: apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apache2_2.4.10-10+deb8u5_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Am 24.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: jessie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Dear release team,
>
> for the upcoming jessie stable release, I'd like to update the systemd
> package with the
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:43:19 -0500 Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
> I'll try to check out snapshots
> later this week to see if I can figure out when the transition actually
> happened, or if there was something else going on in the archive to
> explain it.
Thanks for your help!
Please keep us
Hi Bertrand,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 09:30:22PM +0200, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> >> Do you think we could allow the libmicrohttpd transition ?
> > Yes. Go ahead.
> Thanks ! I uploaded a new revision targeting unstable to
> mentors [1]
thanks, uploaded to sid.
--
cheers,
Holger
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/07/16 19:20, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Still ok to consider this as a release goal?
>
> Absolutely.
Great, thanks!
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The additional bugs I filed are at:
>
>
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:24:19 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> > On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Should be contacted, perhaps?
> >
> > Sure, if you'd like to.
>
> Dear BTS owner,
> could you please
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:24:19 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Should be contacted, perhaps?
>
> Sure, if you'd like to.
Dear BTS owner,
could you please investigate on what happened to bug #830267 on
2016-07-19T10:00 ?
On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote:
I hope it's possible to investigate further, in order to find out what
really happened: needless to say, I think that the correctness of the
migration process is of great importance to the quality of Debian
testing (and, consequently, of future stable
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:51:45 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2016-07-24 11:20, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Dear Release Team, could you please explain what I failed to understand
> > about the testing migration rules [2]?
>
> Your understanding is correct - an RC bug affecting sid and
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:58:55 +0100
with message-id <9437ab558259338e5559bbe26691d...@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#832333: nmu: sikulix_1.1.0-1~exp3
has caused the Debian Bug report #832333,
regarding nmu: sikulix_1.1.0-1~exp3
to be marked as done.
This
On 2016-07-24 11:20, Francesco Poli wrote:
In the meanwhile, dpkg/1.18.9 managed to migrate to testing [1],
despite
introducing this RC bug: I wonder how that was even possible... do the
testing migration checks skip pending RC bugs?!? a pending bug is not a
fixed bug!!! I am Cc-ing the Release
Am 24.07.2016 um 14:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> * Fix prepare priority queue comparison function in sd-event.
> Otherwise a disabled event source can get swapped with an enabled one
> and cause a severe sd-event malfunction, breaking the event loop.
> (Closes: #789796)
>
>
On 2016-07-24 13:18, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
all packages related to rtmidi transition are fixed and uploaded to
unstable.
Can I now upload rtmidi 2.1.1 to unstable?
Yes please.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
for the upcoming jessie stable release, I'd like to update the systemd
package with the following fixes:
systemd (215-17+deb8u5) stable; urgency=medium
* Use
On 2016-07-23 23:14, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
على السبت 23 تـمـوز 2016 06:56، كتب Jonathan Wiltshire:
On 2016-07-23 09:22, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
The latest upstream release of the mhap package adds a new dependency
on
libssw-java, which is not available for i386. The testing excuses
page
for
"
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Komu: Jaromír Mikeš , 828...@bugs.debian.org
Datum: 28. 6. 2016 10:52:18
Předmět: Re: Bug#828187: transition: rtmidi
"Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 27/06/16 18:44, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu sikulix_1.1.0-1~exp3 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
libopencv-highgui2.4-deb0"
There was yet another opencv transition in sid ...
Andreas
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:14:10 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote:
[...]
> On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 20:37:39 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Package: dpkg
> > Version: 1.18.9
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > dpkg fails to purge a package
[...]
>
> Hmm, thanks for the report, I know where this is coming
On 23/07/16 19:20, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Kind Release Managers:
>
> All the bugs reported by Lucas Nussbaum last week which have not been
> resolved yet are now either in "pending upload" state, or there is a
> patch available:
>
>
24 matches
Mail list logo