Bug#854658: unblock pre-approval request for gitlab

On ഞായര്‍ 12 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 12:24 രാവിലെ, Niels Thykier wrote: > The two patches in the bug looks ok; assuming only a changelog entry on > top of that, then it is a approved. > > For future requests: Could you please provide a source debdiff? It makes > it easier for us for us to figure out what

Bug#855356: marked as done (unblock: mupdf/1.9a+ds1-3)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2017 06:45:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#855356: unblock: mupdf/1.9a+ds1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #855356, regarding unblock: mupdf/1.9a+ds1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

Ian Jackson: > Santiago Vila writes ("Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly"): >> The following packages FTBFS for me randomly. First column is the bug >> number, second column is the estimated probability of failure in my >> build environment, which is described here: > > [...] > > To

Bug#855356: unblock: mupdf/1.9a+ds1-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package mupdf Security fixes * CVE-2017-5896: use-after-free in fz_subsample_pixmap() (Closes: #854734) * CVE-2017-5991: NULL pointer dereference in

Bug#855352: unblock: chromium-browser/56.0.2924.76-1

package: release.debian.org user: release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking chromium. This is a large upstream release like usual with a bunch of security fixes. As is done for jessie, the plan is to push ongoing upstream security updates to

Bug#855345: jessie-pu: package systemd/215-17+deb8u7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd, fixing two bugs. The changelog is systemd (215-17+deb8u7) stable; urgency=medium * bus: Fix bus_print_property() to use "int"

Bug#855133: unblock (pre-approval): flatpak/0.8.3-1

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 at 22:19:12 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 14/02/17 15:42, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I would like release team pre-approval for uploading flatpak/0.8.3-1 > > with the attached debdiff. > > Go ahead. Uploaded and accepted into unstable. Thanks, S

Bug#855341: unblock: mini-httpd/1.23-1.2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package mini-httpd. It has been pointed that this package lost its https support since Jessie. It has nothing to do with with openssl 1.1 :) I uploaded the suggested fix to

Bug#854247: marked as done (unblock: inkscape 0.92.1)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:08:00 + with message-id <571ca766-0582-712a-be39-99888b058...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#854236: unblock: inkscape 0.92.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #854236, regarding unblock: inkscape 0.92.1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#855333: unblock: systemd/231-18

Am 16.02.2017 um 22:12 schrieb Martin Pitt: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hello release team, > > The current systemd in unstable (232-18) fixes an RC bug on architectures that > don't support seccomp

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

Santiago Vila writes ("Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly"): > The following packages FTBFS for me randomly. First column is the bug > number, second column is the estimated probability of failure in my > build environment, which is described here: IMO all of these bugs should be RC.

Bug#855333: marked as done (unblock: systemd/231-18)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:39:33 +0100 with message-id <3e16bc27-67ac-88b9-3be2-117012ae6...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#855333: unblock: systemd/231-18 has caused the Debian Bug report #855333, regarding unblock: systemd/231-18 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#855258: unblock: spice/0.12.8-2.1

On 16.02.2017 22:23, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 16/02/17 06:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> >> Hi >> >> Please unblock package spice

Bug#854236: unblock: inkscape 0.92.1

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 07:05:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Please go ahead then :) This is now uploaded, and built on all relevant (and non) architectures. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about

Bug#855217: unblock: openmpi/2.0.2

On 15/02/17 16:25, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package openmpi to fix RC bug #848574 > > Openmpi 2.0.2 was released just as Stretch was being frozen. The package

Bug#855333: unblock: systemd/231-18

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello release team, The current systemd in unstable (232-18) fixes an RC bug on architectures that don't support seccomp (https://bugs.debian.org/852811), some more seccomp bugs that also affect x86, and a

Bug#855258: unblock: spice/0.12.8-2.1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 16/02/17 06:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hi > > Please unblock package spice > > It fixes two CVEs, CVE-2016-9577 CVE-2016-9578, reported by

Processed: Re: Bug#855258: unblock: spice/0.12.8-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #855258 [release.debian.org] unblock: spice/0.12.8-2.1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 855258: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855258 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#855133: unblock (pre-approval): flatpak/0.8.3-1

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 14/02/17 15:42, Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > I would like release team pre-approval for uploading flatpak/0.8.3-1 > with the attached debdiff. > > The

Processed: Re: Bug#855133: unblock (pre-approval): flatpak/0.8.3-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #855133 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): flatpak/0.8.3-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 855133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855133 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#855217: unblock: openmpi/2.0.2

FWIW, builds of at least dune-common [1], elpa [2] and trilinos [3] have become successful again since the upload of openmpi/2.0.2. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=dune-common=mips64el [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=elpa=mips64el [3]

Processed: openmpi / petsc / deal.ii

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 855328 by 854905 Bug #855328 [release.debian.org] nmu: deal.ii_8.4.2-2 855328 was not blocked by any bugs. 855328 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 855328: 855204 and 854905 > block 849764 by 855328 Bug #849764

Bug#855328: nmu: deal.ii_8.4.2-2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi release team Deal.ii needs to be rebuild against openmpi to pick up headers in the new multiarch locations (#849764). It will also need to be rebuilt after petsc is rebuilt (#854905). I suggest only

Bug#855312: marked as done (unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:00:00 + with message-id <32d46313-84bb-9b68-82b3-25fcd83b1...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#855312: unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #855312, regarding unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#855312: unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1

Niels Thykier (2017-02-16): > Simon McVittie: > > I would like to track the dbus-1.10 branch in stretch-as-stable, as > > I have for dbus-1.8 in jessie. I am an upstream dbus maintainer, and > > I plan to continue to produce minimal upstream stable releases. > > > > I plan to

Processed: libboinc-app-dev: depends on old versions of libstdc++

Processing control commands: > block 851871 by -1 Bug #851871 [release.debian.org] RM: gcc-5/5.4.1-4 851871 was blocked by: 852008 852009 851871 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 851871: 855316 -- 851871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851871 855316:

Bug#855312: unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 at 16:54:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Looks good to me, but needs an ACK from KiBi due to its udebs. I'm curious whether debian-installer actually uses them yet... (We added these udebs early in the jessie-as-testing cycle for AT-SPI's benefit.) S

Processed: Re: Bug#855312: unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #855312 [release.debian.org] unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 855312: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855312 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#855312: unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1

Control: tags -1 confirmed Simon McVittie: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package dbus. This new upstream release fixes a couple > of symlink attacks in rare code paths, which could be argued

Bug#855312: unblock: dbus/1.10.16-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dbus. This new upstream release fixes a couple of symlink attacks in rare code paths, which could be argued to be security vulnerabilities by someone sufficiently

Re: Bug#740998: Bug#854801: No network after netinst Stretch RC2

On 14.02.2017 00:43, Pierre Ynard wrote: Hi, >> in finish-install /e/n/i will never be properly populated for a wireless >> installation without network-manager, although I think ifupdown would be >> capable to do this (not tested, but have a look at >>

Bug#855109: unblock: pyrit/0.4.0-7.1

Hi, >This failed to build on i386. I saw it already, and I'm having difficulties in understanding why (builds fine on pbuilder sid i386, debomatic sbuild i386, bad on barriere i386 dchroot). Asked for help on -mentors mail list thanks G.