> "Michael" == Michael Biebl writes:
Michael> If a service is not supposed to be enabled, then an
Michael> override for dh_installsystemd is the correct solution,
Michael> setting --no-enable, but not by moving it into a
Michael> subpackage.
Sorry, I was imprecise.
Imagine
Am 28.02.23 um 21:48 schrieb Sam Hartman:
>> Moreover, I suspect in a number of the cases related to this
>> current bug, replaces will be likely. I suspect that in some of
>> the cases where units have been introduced that are disabled
>> currently, but will be enabled by
Hi Ana,
On 28-02-2023 21:57, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
Please, keep debian-timeline out of bookworm, the installed HTML doesn't
show the timeline like it should so the package is useless.
The recommended way to achieve that is by filing an RC bug against the
package and let autoremoval take
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:12:56 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1032162: RM: debian-timeline/45
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032162,
regarding RM: debian-timeline/45
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
>> Moreover, I suspect in a number of the cases related to this
>> current bug, replaces will be likely. I suspect that in some of
>> the cases where units have been introduced that are disabled
>> currently, but will be enabled by the dh_installsystemd change,
>> we will
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:debian-timeline
Bug #1032162 [release.debian.org] RM: debian-timeline/45
Added indication that 1032162 affects src:debian-timeline
--
1032162: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032162
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-timel...@packages.debian.org,
debian-public...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:debian-timeline
Please, keep debian-timeline out of bookworm, the installed HTML
On 2023-02-28 10:26:07 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Sebastian" == Sebastian Ramacher writes:
>
> Sebastian> Can you expand your concern? I expect that this issue
> Sebastian> goes away as soon as we can assume that all systems are
> Sebastian> /usr-merged. At that point I
Hi Wouter,
On 27-02-2023 23:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
To be clear: this would require a pass through NEW, for the RDM tester
package ("ola-rdm-tester"). That's okay then? If so, can you add the
unblock? If not, I'll leave the rdm-tester for after the release.
No, adding new binaries is not
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Ramacher writes:
Sebastian> Can you expand your concern? I expect that this issue
Sebastian> goes away as soon as we can assume that all systems are
Sebastian> /usr-merged. At that point I expect that we are able to
Sebastian> drop the workaround
On 2023-02-28 07:28:18 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Sebastian" == Sebastian Ramacher writes:
>
> Sebastian> On 2023-02-23 11:12:00 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >> > "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
> >>
> Sean> Hello,
> Sean> On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 09:55AM +01,
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Ramacher writes:
Sebastian> On 2023-02-23 11:12:00 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> > "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
>>
Sean> Hello,
Sean> On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 09:55AM +01, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>
>> >> Unless I am missing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: node-cookie...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:node-cookiejar
[ Reason ]
node-cookiejar is vulnerable to ReDoS (CVE-2022-25901).
[ Impact ]
Medium
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:node-cookiejar
Bug #1032134 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
node-cookiejar/2.1.2-1+deb11u1
Added indication that 1032134 affects src:node-cookiejar
--
1032134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032134
Debian Bug
On 2023-02-23 11:12:00 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
>
> Sean> Hello,
> Sean> On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 09:55AM +01, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> >> Unless I am missing something, having dh_installsystemd look at
> >> the service files in /usr/lib
15 matches
Mail list logo
