Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1033900 [release.debian.org] pre-approval: dkms/3.0.11-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1033900: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033900
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andreas,
On 27-04-2023 18:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
So unless
something else appears that warrants an unblock, let's not do this.
^^^
I've just uploaded a new upstream release 3.0.11-1 with some additional
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock package binutils-mingw-w64.
[ Reason ]
Version 10.4 includes a two-line upstream fix for a crash when
handling certain import libraries.
[ Impact ]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1035509 - moreinfo
Bug #1035509 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: vim/2:9.0.1378-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle 1035509 unblock: vim/2:9.0.1378-2
Bug #1035509 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: vim/2:9.0.1378-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: alsa-to...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:alsa-tools
Please unblock package alsa-tools
As reported in #1035104, alsa-tools-gui is missing a dependency on
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:alsa-tools
Bug #1035532 [release.debian.org] unblock: alsa-tools/1.2.5-3
Added indication that 1035532 affects src:alsa-tools
--
1035532: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035532
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Your message dated Thu, 04 May 2023 19:46:39 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock nncp
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035514,
regarding unblock: nncp/8.8.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 04 May 2023 19:45:59 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock python-django
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035520,
regarding unblock: python-django/3:3.2.19-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi Hector,
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 05:53:24PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Since you have not uploaded the package yet, are you fine if I do a
> regular upload with the patch, then use this unblock request to add
> the package to bookworm.
Of course, please go ahead.
Thanks,
Emanuele
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 07:50:37PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> [ Checklist ]
> [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
> [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
> [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
I
Your message dated Thu, 04 May 2023 18:16:13 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock onionshare
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035513,
regarding unblock: onionshare/2.6-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 04 May 2023 18:14:48 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock waylandpp
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035510,
regarding unblock: waylandpp/1.0.0-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2023-05-04 07:50:01 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: v...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:vim
>
> Please unblock
Your message dated Thu, 04 May 2023 18:13:41 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock osra
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035492,
regarding unblock: osra/2.1.3-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #1035509 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: vim/2:9.0.1378-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
1035509: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035509
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Your message dated Thu, 04 May 2023 18:12:57 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock postfix
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035487,
regarding unblock: postfix/3.7.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-security-support to fix #1034077
"debian-security-support: Lots of noise about DEBIAN_VERSION 12 being invalid
when upgrading bullseye→bookworm" in bookworm
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
hi,
this is a pre-approval request, I have not uploaded this yet (except to
unstable).
[ Reason ]
unfortunatly debian-security-support in both bullseye and bookworm
are
Hi release team,
Andreas Beckmann does wonderful QA work and recently figured that some
packages use deluser during purge (e.g. #1035494 and #1035495). deluser
is shipped with adduser and adduser used to be practically essential,
becaue apt used to depend on it, but that dependency was removed on
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Dear Release Team,
Please consider unblocking python-django 3:3.2.19-1:
python-django (3:3.2.19-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream security
Hello,
While I agree we should get this fixed on bookworm, I believe to be
able to unblock a package, the package should exist in the archive.
Since you have not uploaded the package yet, are you fine if I do a
regular upload with the patch, then use this unblock request to add
the package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1033953 - moreinfo
Bug #1033953 [release.debian.org] unblock: gimp-help/2.10.34-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1033953:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:gdb
Hello release team,
Please unblock package gdb.
[ Reason ]
The most basic functionality
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:gdb
Bug #1035515 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: gdb/13.1-2.1
Added indication that 1035515 affects src:gdb
--
1035515: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nncp
[ Reason ]
This unblock request is to support a small three-line diff that
corrects a data handling bug in NNCP.
[ Impact ]
At
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:onionshare
Bug #1035513 [release.debian.org] unblock: onionshare/2.6-3
Added indication that 1035513 affects src:onionshare
--
1035513: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035513
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: onionsh...@packages.debian.org, he...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:onionshare
Please unblock package onionshare
[ Reason ]
The new version fixes #1014966. It is only
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:fvwm
Bug #1035512 [release.debian.org] unblock: fvwm/1:2.7.0-2
Added indication that 1035512 affects src:fvwm
--
1035512: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035512
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: f...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:fvwm
Please unblock package fvwm 1:2.7.0-2
The newly uploaded package fixes bug #1034054 in which a change in
libX11 1.8.1
Hey Paul,
El dc. 03 de 05 de 2023 a les 19:48 +0200, en/na Paul Gevers va
escriure:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On 03-05-2023 12:03, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > This is the final .debdiff for this unblock request.
>
> There might have been a misunderstanding, but your debdiff misses
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: waylan...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:waylandpp
Please unblock package waylandpp
[ Reason ]
The new release is a fix for the RC bug #1035462
[ Impact ]
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:waylandpp
Bug #1035510 [release.debian.org] unblock: waylandpp/1.0.0-4
Added indication that 1035510 affects src:waylandpp
--
1035510: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035510
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: v...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:vim
Please unblock package vim
[ Reason ]
- Fix for CVE-2023-2426 (using uninitialized memory)
- Minor fix for indenting of
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:vim
Bug #1035509 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: vim/2:9.0.1378-2
Added indication that 1035509 affects src:vim
--
1035509: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035509
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:osra
Bug #1035492 [release.debian.org] unblock: osra/2.1.3-3
Added indication that 1035492 affects src:osra
--
1035492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: o...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:osra
Please unblock package osra
[ Reason ]
* #1035455 libosra-dev: missing Depends: libosra2 (= ${binary:Version})
[
On 2023-05-04 06:52:56 +0400, Yadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a new debdiff:
>
> Please unblock package node-core-js
Updated my hint.
Cheers
>
> [ Reason ]
> 1. "Breaks" field isn't enough for apt, it needs a "Replaces" to manage
>file conflicts (#1034947, #1034980, #1034989, #1035000)
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
