On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 19:34 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 05:44:30PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > In the interests of not blocking on things other than SRM's free
> > time,
> > how does this sound as some blurb for an announcement mail?
> >
> >
> > The
Hi all,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-21):
> Dates that have been announced[1] so far:
> - 2023-05-24: full freeze
[x] ← You are here!
> - 2023-05-28: last moment to file unblock requests
> - 2023-06-03: bookworm totally frozen
>(per “last week prior to the release”)
>
> 1.
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 20:07:58 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-med
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036557,
regarding unblock: debian-med/3.8.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 20:06:18 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ruby-terser
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036699,
regarding unblock: ruby-terser/1.1.12+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 20:04:57 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ayatana-indicator-sound
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036542,
regarding unblock: ayatana-indicator-sound/22.9.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 20:03:02 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock mcpl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036664,
regarding unblock: mcpl/1.3.2-3.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 20:04:37 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock tone-generator
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036541,
regarding unblock: tone-generator/1.6.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 20:04:27 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock lomiri-session
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036540,
regarding unblock: lomiri-session/0.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 20:01:33 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock glusterfs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036673,
regarding unblock: glusterfs/10.3-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 20:02:06 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock scotch
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036665,
regarding unblock: scotch/7.0.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Control: tags -1 trixie
On 2023-05-24 19:40:48 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 06:54:01PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Watching from the sideline, this seems to come in horribly late.
>
> How am I not to agree with this?
>
> > > apt used to depend on adduser and apt
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 21:34:23 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1036717: unblock: slurm-wlm/22.05.8-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036717,
regarding unblock: slurm-wlm/22.05.8-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 19:33:51 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock slurm-wlm-contrib
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036718,
regarding unblock: slurm-wlm-contrib/22.05.8-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fai
I've added a small patch, which prevents overwriting a variable
with an empty value. Now we only write if the variable is not empty.
The PR for this says:
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 19:32:00 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock thunderbird
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036722,
regarding unblock: thunderbird/1:102.11.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 19:31:16 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock opencascade
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036598,
regarding unblock: opencascade/7.6.3+dfsg1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 19:28:54 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock node-socket.io-parser
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036660,
regarding unblock: node-socket.io-parser/4.2.1+~3.1.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 19:28:14 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock sofia-sip
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036625,
regarding unblock: sofia-sip/1.12.11+20110422.1+1e14eea~dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 19:26:04 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock twinkle
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036552,
regarding unblock: twinkle/1:1.10.2+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Beckmann (2023-05-24):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Ben file:
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-nvidia-cuda-toolkit.html
> (there are some more packages that B-D:
On 24/05/2023 21.13, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Just for the avoidance of doubt since this topic came up during our
meeting: this is definitely post-bookworm, right?
Yes.
Andreas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: thunderb...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:thunderbird
Please unblock package thunderbird
[ Reason ]
Upstream released a new ESR version of Thunderbird which
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:thunderbird
Bug #1036722 [release.debian.org] unblock: thunderbird/1:102.11.0-1
Added indication that 1036722 affects src:thunderbird
--
1036722: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1034558 with 1036721
Bug #1034558 {Done: Daniel Kahn Gillmor } [src:rnp]
rnp: CVE-2023-29479 CVE-2023-29480
1034558 was not blocked by any bugs.
1034558 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1034558: 1036721
> thanks
Stopping
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@packages.debian.org, d...@fifthhorseman.net
Control: affects -1 + src:rnp
Control: blocks -1 + 1034558
Please unblock package rnp
[ Reason ]
RNP upstream provided a
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:rnp
Bug #1036721 [release.debian.org] unblock: rnp/0.16.3-1
Added indication that 1036721 affects src:rnp
> blocks -1 + 1034558
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
1036721:
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 06:54:01PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Watching from the sideline, this seems to come in horribly late.
How am I not to agree with this?
> > apt used to depend on adduser and apt is required, so adduser is
> > transitively required in bullseye. Johannes and myself
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: sxmo-ut...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:sxmo-utils
Please unblock package sxmo-utils
[ Reason ]
Removing sxmo-utils but not purging it leaves behind a
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:sxmo-utils
Bug #1036720 [release.debian.org] unblock: sxmo-utils/1.12.0-7
Added indication that 1036720 affects src:sxmo-utils
--
1036720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: oliv...@na.icar.cnr.it
Please unblock package slurm-wlm-contrib
This release provide the same version level of the free package
slurm-wlm
[ Reason ]
This package has no
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: oliv...@na.icar.cnr.it
Please unblock package slurm-wlm
This release simply fix Breaks/Replaces deps and reintroduce a
configuration file removed accidentally
[ Reason ]
Hi,
With only my random DD and d-i hats, leaving the release one aside…
Helmut Grohne (2023-05-24):
> I am requesting to override the priority of adduser to become
> required.
Watching from the sideline, this seems to come in horribly late.
> apt used to depend on adduser and apt is required,
Two diffs attached.
diff -purN xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.20/debian/changelog
xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.21/debian/changelog
--- xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.20/debian/changelog 2022-02-14
04:44:09.0 +0200
+++ xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.21/debian/changelog 2023-05-20
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 18:47:07 +0200
with message-id <78caef53-3783-00c3-04c2-c0f04c27c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1036524: unblock: dokuwiki/0.0.20220731.a-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036524,
regarding unblock: dokuwiki/0.0.20220731.a-2
to be marked as done.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:xserver-xorg-video-geode
Bug #1036713 [release.debian.org] unblock: xserver-xorg-video-geode/2.11.21-1
Added indication that 1036713 affects src:xserver-xorg-video-geode
--
1036713: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036713
Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: xserver-xorg-video-ge...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:xserver-xorg-video-geode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please unblock package
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Mike,
On 21-05-2023 21:38, Mike Gabriel wrote:
In addition to the adduser changes, the diff to testing also includes a simple
directory-exists test before writing to it.
See below, I see more. Please elaborate.
+ * bin/debian-edu-faiinstall: Make sure
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1036474 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-edu-fai/2023.05.16.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1036474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036474
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 18:23:14 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1036473: unblock: x2gobroker/0.0.4.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036473,
regarding unblock: x2gobroker/0.0.4.3-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Forgot to add the debdiff…
diff -Nru libsepol-3.4/debian/changelog libsepol-3.4/debian/changelog
--- libsepol-3.4/debian/changelog 2022-06-15 09:56:48.0 +0200
+++ libsepol-3.4/debian/changelog 2023-05-24 16:43:03.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libsepol (3.4-2.1) unstable;
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: camp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:camping
Please unblock package camping
It fixes a broken symlink to a font. (#861040)
This had been fixed already
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:camping
Bug #1036711 [release.debian.org] unblock: camping/2.3-1.1
Added indication that 1036711 affects src:camping
--
1036711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Hi Otto,
On 24-05-2023 17:44, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
The CI
detected a couple days ago a regression in Piuparts, potentially due
to recent adduser 1.133 upload, which I still need to debug and decide
what to do on.
You can ignore it. It's known and being worked on.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Hi!
> On 15-05-2023 07:55, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > This pre-unblock request is to get a decision from the Bookworm
> > release team if you prefer to accept this 10.11.3 into Bookworm, or if
> > you wish it to be postponed to a stable update in Bookworm some time
> > later in fall 2023.
>
> I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: reserial...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:reserialize
Please unblock package reserialize
In November, I added a custom patch which I hoped would have allowed
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:reserialize
Bug #1036710 [release.debian.org] unblock: reserialize/20220929-2
Added indication that 1036710 affects src:reserialize
--
1036710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036710
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: libse...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libsepol
Please unblock package libsepol
It fixes #1031798, inaccurate copyright file.
No other changes done.
[
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:libsepol
Bug #1036709 [release.debian.org] unblock: libsepol/3.4-2.1
Added indication that 1036709 affects src:libsepol
--
1036709: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036709
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1036679 src:magma 2.6.2-1
Bug #1036679 [magma] magma: FTBFS with CUDA 12: error: 'csrsm2Info_t' does not
name a type
Bug reassigned from package 'magma' to 'src:magma'.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.2-1.
Ignoring request to
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 15:14, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 08-05-2023 17:54, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Filing this on request of the dash maintainer. We have recently
> > implemented a much needed cleanup that removes an unnecessary diversion
> > on /bin/sh, that makes the essential set
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 16:14:02 +0200
with message-id <440f93c3-69cf-a151-b1cd-c9ceb4fb9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1035745: unblock: dash/0.5.12-4 (preapproval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035745,
regarding unblock: dash/0.5.12-4 (preapproval)
to be marked as
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: override
X-Debbugs-Cc: addu...@packages.debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org,
debian-release@lists.debian.org, jo...@debian.org, de...@lists.debian.org,
piuparts-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Control:
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:57 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> [ Checklist ]
> [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
Sorry, missing attachment...
dhcpcd5_9.4.1-22.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: dhcp...@packages.debian.org, z...@debian.org,
martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi
Control: affects -1 + src:dhcpcd5
Please unblock package dhcpcd5
[ Reason ]
The packages fails to run
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:dhcpcd5
Bug #1036704 [release.debian.org] unblock: dhcpcd5/9.4.1-22
Added indication that 1036704 affects src:dhcpcd5
--
1036704: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036704
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:openstructure
Bug #1036700 [release.debian.org] unblock: openstructure/2.3.1-9
Added indication that 1036700 affects src:openstructure
--
1036700: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036700
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: openstruct...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openstructure
Please unblock package openstructure
[ Reason ]
* #1036639: libost-base2.3: please add Breaks:
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:ruby-terser
Bug #1036699 [release.debian.org] unblock: ruby-terser/1.1.12+dfsg-2
Added indication that 1036699 affects src:ruby-terser
--
1036699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036699
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-ter...@packages.debian.org, mdbi...@disroot.org,
prav...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-terser
Please unblock package ruby-terser
[ Reason ]
This fixes the
Hi release team,
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:46:45PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package ffmpeg
>
> [ Reason ]
> ffmpeg releases stable updates with
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:tzdata
Bug #1036686 [release.debian.org] unblock: tzdata/2023c-4
Added indication that 1036686 affects src:tzdata
--
1036686: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036686
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> block 1036676 with -1
Bug #1036676 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 12
1036676 was blocked by: 1036677 1036680 1036683 1036681 1036679 1036682
1036676 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1036676: 1036684
--
1036676:
Processing control commands:
> block 1036676 with -1
Bug #1036676 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 12
1036676 was blocked by: 1036680 1036682 1036679 1036677 1036681
1036676 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1036676: 1036683
--
1036676:
Processing control commands:
> block 1036676 with -1
Bug #1036676 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 12
1036676 was blocked by: 1036680 1036681 1036677 1036679
1036676 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1036676: 1036682
--
1036676:
Processing control commands:
> block 1036676 with -1
Bug #1036676 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 12
1036676 was blocked by: 1036677 1036679 1036680
1036676 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1036676: 1036681
--
1036676:
Processing control commands:
> block 1036676 with -1
Bug #1036676 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 12
1036676 was blocked by: 1036679 1036677
1036676 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1036676: 1036680
--
1036676:
Processing control commands:
> block 1036676 with -1
Bug #1036676 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 12
1036676 was blocked by: 1036677
1036676 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1036676: 1036679
--
1036676:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #1036081 [release.debian.org] pre-unblock: mariadb/1:10.11.3-1
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
1036081: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036081
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hi Otto,
On 15-05-2023 07:55, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
This pre-unblock request is to get a decision from the Bookworm
release team if you prefer to accept this 10.11.3 into Bookworm, or if
you wish it to be postponed to a stable update in Bookworm some time
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ffmpeg
[ Reason ]
ffmpeg releases stable updates with security fixes on a regular basis.
For Debian (old)stable, we publish these updates via DSAs. For bookworm,
we
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Mon, 08 May 2023 18:16:51 +0200 Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
wrote:
A new upstream version of modsecurity fixes a security bug
(CVE-2023-28882, #1035083).
We also fixed a FTBFS in the meantime (#1034760).
Also nginx moved to pcre2, which we also did after the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1035748 [release.debian.org] unblock: modsecurity/3.0.9-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1035748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035748
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> block 1036676 with -1
Bug #1036676 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 12
1036676 was not blocked by any bugs.
1036676 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1036676: 1036677
--
1036676:
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 12:07:17 +0200
with message-id <3604cf6f-2db3-fb03-782a-132629985...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1036634: RM: monado/stable -- NVIU; 2 years old
codebase for very active project targeting recent hardware and software stack
(new version didn't make it
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #1036634 [ftp.debian.org] RM: monado/stable -- NVIU; 2 years old codebase
for very active project targeting recent hardware and software stack (new
version didn't make it into stable).
Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org'
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
The switch from CUDA 11 to CUDA 12 seems to have bigger impact on the
dependencies, thus I'm going to block this bug with the corresponding
FTBFS bugs.
(There are no binNMUs to be
Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 RM: monado -- should not be released with bookworm
Hi
On 24-05-2023 10:45, David Heidelberg wrote:
My goal was to drop the package for the Debian 12 (bookworm); it makes
no sense to include the package and confuse users. However, I'll
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package manaplus
[ Reason ]
fonts-mplus removed the ttf versions of the required fonts, this also results
in broken symlinks. I am shipping the embedded version of both font
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package glusterfs
[ Reason ]
I have applied a patch from 10.4, which fixes a security issue as described in
CVE-2023-26253, #1031731 and
Hello Paul.
My goal was to drop the package for the Debian 12 (bookworm); it makes
no sense to include the package and confuse users. However, I'll remind
Ryan (CCed) from time to time to bump the Monado into unstable, so at
the next release, we get a recent Monado to play with
David
On
On Wed, 24 May 2023 09:59:31 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2023-05-24 09:48:31)
> > mmdebstrap's autopkgtest seem to depend quite extensively on the
state of
> > other packages in the archive. Maybe it would be better to make
them as
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: sco...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:scotch
Please unblock package scotch
[ Reason ]
Bug#1036576 reported dangling links, which is an RC bug.
scotch 7.0.3-2
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:scotch
Bug #1036665 [release.debian.org] unblock: scotch/7.0.3-2
Added indication that 1036665 affects src:scotch
--
1036665: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036665
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mcpl
[ Reason ]
Missing Depends: cause piuparts failures. Bug #1035450 reported by
Andreas Beckmann, then fix NMUed as 1.3.2-3.1 by Andreas Metzler.
[ Tests ]
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package onetbb
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team to judge the request efficiently. E.g. by
filling in the sections below.)
[
Hi,
Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2023-05-24 09:48:31)
> mmdebstrap's autopkgtest seem to depend quite extensively on the state of
> other packages in the archive. Maybe it would be better to make them as
> flaky.
I don't think that would be wise. We do these tests for packages to find out
when
On 2023-05-24 09:12:14 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2023-05-24 08:31:36)
> > Please check the autopkgtests. They are failing with errors that seem
> > unrelated to doc-debian.
>
> yes. As I said in my original email. mmdebstrap in unstable
Hi,
Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2023-05-24 08:31:36)
> Please check the autopkgtests. They are failing with errors that seem
> unrelated to doc-debian.
yes. As I said in my original email. mmdebstrap in unstable prepares not only
for doc-debian but also for dash. But maybe you are not going to
Your message dated Wed, 24 May 2023 06:39:32 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock iproute2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036554,
regarding unblock: iproute2/6.1.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On 2023-05-20 13:54:14 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2023-05-20 13:38:20)
> > > some of the packages uploaded to unstable or experimental are breaking the
> > > mmdebstrap autopkgtest:
> > >
> > > - doc-debian rebuilt with debhelper (>=
90 matches
Mail list logo
